Labidas

Labidas — CS2 Stats

EE76561198059055439[U:1:98789711]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,850Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,016Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#94971 of 248042 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,000 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,000 → 2,000
+20Tracked matches · now 1,850
+6.7ppWin rate · 33.3% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,945 -350 10 Aug – 27 Sept · 6 days played
18,81319,295peak 19,29510 Aug27 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,000 +0 31 Aug – 27 Sept · 3 observations
2,0002,000peak 2,00031 Aug27 Sept
19,295Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,000Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,000
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches23——
Win rate43%——
K/D0.93——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 27 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches45——
Win rate31%——
K/D0.88——
Headshot %60%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate57.9%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy17.1%13.3%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.851.071.090.24 short
Match win rate44.2%46.9%48.4%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLabidasFACEITLevel 9 · 2,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,000csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning63
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–56Last 10044%Win rateWLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.8pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.3
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time584ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+5.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 16–13 · nuke, 2 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 23 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 24 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C187–1139%-0.02
ancientC167–944%-0.02
anubisC156–940%-0.01
nukeA149–564%-0.01
mirageD134–931%-0.02
infernoD124–833%-0.01
cacheA127–558%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

167,271Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
6,806Matches
44.2%Match win rate
57.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
16,913MVPs
3,546Hours (in match)
2,748Bombs planted
1,555Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4774,791
AWP8,813
FAMAS4,072
AUG3,714
P902,458
Knife2,407

Lifetime map wins

12,870dust2
10,734inferno
6,108nuke
3,839vertigo
2,262train
366lake
317office
260assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,288Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
82.1ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13345%1.0617.5
Anubis11947%1.0016.6
Mirage10951%1.0716.6
Nuke10351%1.0817.7
Inferno10047%1.0416.4
Dust29845%1.0217.0
Overpass4347%1.0015.8
Vertigo2846%1.2121.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
589msReaction time
52.9%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
2.37HE damage / grenade
3.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4977 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.0418%2 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0223%2 Oct →
ancient13–110.0220%2 Oct →
inferno6–130.0527%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0216%30 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0915%30 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0624%29 Sept →
dust29–130.0019%29 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0316%29 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0729%29 Sept →
ancient13–90.0235%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0325%28 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0431%28 Sept →
mirage11–130.0829%27 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0220%27 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0427%27 Sept →
nuke13–10.0230%27 Sept →
nuke13–20.0020%27 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0616%27 Sept →
ancient6–130.0642%23 Sept →
anubis11–130.0126%23 Sept →
inferno16–130.0121%23 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0813%22 Sept →
dust20–13-0.1230%22 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0638%19 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0930%19 Sept →
cache13–50.0129%19 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0324%19 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0326%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0435%8 Sept →
inferno11–130.0322%8 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0730%8 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0722%6 Sept →
mirage10–130.0229%6 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0033%5 Sept →
mirage16–120.0227%5 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0129%3 Sept →
cache13–110.0529%3 Sept →
mirage13–10.0821%2 Sept →
nuke16–130.1226%2 Sept →
ancient10–130.0120%2 Sept →
inferno13–90.0122%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0122%1 Sept →
anubis17–190.0619%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0220%31 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0728%31 Aug →
dust210–130.0221%30 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0116%30 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0212%27 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0322%27 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0119%27 Aug →
mirage8–130.0221%27 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.087%27 Aug →
anubis7–130.0029%27 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0223%27 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0414%26 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0313%26 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0923%26 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0520%26 Aug →
anubis13–80.1215%26 Aug →
anubis16–19-0.0315%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.0719%24 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0418%24 Aug →
nuke13–50.0626%24 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0417%24 Aug →
cache13–40.0315%24 Aug →
nuke13–70.0420%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0119%24 Aug →
anubis13–20.0213%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0822%19 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0513%19 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0119%19 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0524%19 Aug →
nuke13–70.0319%19 Aug →
inferno6–130.0321%19 Aug →
dust213–80.0434%19 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0311%18 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0217%18 Aug →
dust213–80.0430%18 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0617%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.1119%17 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0118%17 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0116%17 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0319%17 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0122%17 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.1010%16 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0615%16 Aug →
mirage13–100.0113%16 Aug →
dust216–140.0129%16 Aug →
cache11–13-0.079%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0516%16 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0110%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0715%14 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0317%14 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0720%10 Aug →
anubis16–140.0220%10 Aug →
inferno6–130.0025%10 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0030%10 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0231%9 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0426%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.