Bralle — CS2 Stats

SE76561198058873675[U:1:98607947]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

712Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,108 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning48

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–48Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression5.4

Utility5.4

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning4.8

Utility5.4

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time534ms−29ms

first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms

Headshot accuracy19.7%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–1Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 49% over 47

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	47	23–24	49%	-0.01
inferno	S	17	11–6	65%	0.01
cache	B	17	9–8	53%	-0.01
dust2	A	11	6–5	55%	0.00
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (49% over 47). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

350Matches

60%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

72.6ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	141	55%	1.05	14.6
Inferno	66	65%	0.94	13.9
Dust2	50	62%	0.92	13.4
Cache	24	62%	1.03	14.1
Ancient	24	62%	0.94	15.3
Overpass	22	77%	1.16	16.8
Nuke	11	45%	1.08	17.1
Anubis	7	71%	0.79	12.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.7%Spray accuracy

83.2%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

537msReaction time

27.4%T opening success

43.7%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

9.28HE damage / grenade

5.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.3891% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

49% win rate across 47 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	11–13	-0.01	18%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.06	11%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	28%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	28%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	12%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	37%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	13%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	22%	24 Aug →
ancient	22–25	-0.02	12%	23 Aug →
nuke	17–19	0.04	30%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	17%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	18%	21 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	22%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	23%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	22%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	17%	19 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.00	12%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	13%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	25%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	16 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.02	23%	16 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.04	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	13%	16 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.02	27%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	17%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	14%	12 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	4%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.04	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	19%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.03	22%	10 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	22–25	-0.00	15%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.00	32%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	16%	6 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	30%	6 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	12%	6 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	24%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	25%	5 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.06	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	21%	3 Aug →
dust2	16–19	0.01	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	23%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.04	22%	2 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	12%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	28%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	8%	30 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.01	15%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	29%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	35%	28 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	24%	28 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	37%	28 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	21%	28 Jul →
inferno	18–22	0.00	13%	27 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	10%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	25%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	29%	7 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	9%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	13%	29 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	15%	29 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.04	25%	29 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	8%	29 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.00	20%	25 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.02	12%	25 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	15%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.05	25%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–16	0.01	20%	24 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.01	19%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.05	16%	23 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.01	17%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.14	18%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.07	24%	23 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	18%	22 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.04	31%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	14%	21 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	16%	21 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	20%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	20%	18 Jun →
mirage	22–20	-0.01	26%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	15%	16 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.03	23%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	12%	14 Jun →