Serquest

Serquest — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198058844851[U:1:98579123]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,735Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
10,068Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,399Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,523 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,399 +2,326 9 Mar – 13 Oct · 28 days played
15,07318,152peak 18,1529 Mar13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,523 +0 27 Aug – 16 Sept · 4 observations
1,5231,523peak 1,52327 Aug16 Sept
18,152Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,523Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,523
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 8 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 753 below peak (18,152)
  • -20 over 30 days · steady
  • +466 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,601 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches80——
Win rate60%——
K/D1.15——
Headshot %52%——

Measured 16 Sep 2026 → 19 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate49.4%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy18.4%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.051.060.12 short
Match win rate44.5%45.7%46.3%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSerquestFACEITLevel 7 · 1,523 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,399 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,523csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning57
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLWWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −139ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 0–7 · nuke, 5 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · nuke, 5 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 16 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15nukeWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2211–1150%0.02
mirageB189–950%0.01
infernoB157–847%0.02
ancientS1511–473%0.01
nukeD143–1121%0.03
cacheD93–633%0.01
anubis—32–167%-0.03
overpass—31–233%-0.02
rush_001—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

306,323Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
11,813Matches
44.5%Match win rate
49.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
18.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
28,599MVPs
10,068Hours (in match)
12,706Bombs planted
4,980Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47126,500
AWP22,463
Glock-1810,133
P2505,896
FAMAS5,135
Knife4,859

Lifetime map wins

24,333inferno
22,051dust2
7,720nuke
6,554train
5,386vertigo
2,707cbble
238lake
206office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,089Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14149%1.0115.1
Dust210248%1.0415.7
Inferno10059%1.1316.5
Ancient8353%1.0715.8
Nuke4643%1.0817.2
Anubis4648%0.9015.3
Vertigo1747%1.0317.1
Cache1331%1.0114.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
592msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
8.58HE damage / grenade
8.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0212%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.0327%12 Oct →
cache16–130.0510%11 Oct →
rush_0015–80.0136%4 Oct →
mirage11–130.0118%20 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0619%19 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0321%17 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0129%16 Sept →
dust28–130.0223%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.0427%12 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0412%12 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0622%6 Sept →
dust28–130.0125%3 Sept →
dust213–30.1522%1 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0317%1 Sept →
cache5–130.0330%1 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0626%29 Aug →
dust213–90.0415%24 Aug →
dust213–30.0413%23 Aug →
dust27–130.0219%22 Aug →
inferno8–130.0415%22 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0210%15 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0515%15 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0518%15 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0320%12 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0014%8 Aug →
inferno13–110.0221%4 Aug →
ancient13–80.0130%4 Aug →
dust213–60.0524%3 Aug →
inferno13–110.1112%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0212%1 Aug →
cache6–130.0222%1 Aug →
nuke15–150.0628%1 Aug →
nuke7–130.0117%1 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0416%1 Aug →
cache5–130.0117%1 Aug →
anubis0–13-0.040%19 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0713%18 Jul →
cache13–30.1238%12 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0114%12 Jul →
mirage16–140.0114%12 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0522%11 Jul →
inferno9–130.0026%10 Jul →
mirage13–100.0322%10 Jul →
cache13–100.0317%10 Jul →
nuke13–50.0714%10 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0122%10 Jul →
dust213–110.0220%6 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0624%6 Jul →
mirage13–80.0826%6 Jul →
nuke0–70.2050%5 Jul →
mirage13–90.0321%5 Jul →
dust213–50.1222%5 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0432%5 Jul →
dust28–130.0128%2 Jul →
inferno13–70.0421%21 Jun →
inferno15–150.0926%20 Jun →
nuke6–130.0716%14 Jun →
ancient13–90.0331%18 May →
nuke6–130.1019%17 May →
ancient13–10-0.0018%11 May →
dust213–9-0.0114%4 May →
dust213–20.0930%4 May →
mirage11–130.0614%3 May →
overpass13–110.0119%21 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0532%15 Apr →
inferno6–130.0017%13 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0421%13 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0215%10 Apr →
mirage10–130.0316%9 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0521%9 Apr →
dust23–13-0.1127%8 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0838%6 Apr →
ancient13–30.0526%6 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0238%6 Apr →
ancient19–150.0218%6 Apr →
mirage13–80.0316%4 Apr →
nuke11–130.0119%3 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0123%3 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0424%3 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0522%3 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0413%30 Mar →
dust216–190.0314%30 Mar →
inferno16–130.0520%29 Mar →
nuke10–130.0221%23 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0412%22 Mar →
overpass3–130.0017%21 Mar →
dust213–70.0431%21 Mar →
ancient13–30.1316%21 Mar →
inferno13–90.1521%21 Mar →
mirage13–90.0617%20 Mar →
mirage13–100.0420%20 Mar →
dust210–130.0418%18 Mar →
anubis13–5-0.0215%18 Mar →
mirage13–50.0628%16 Mar →
dust213–10.1220%16 Mar →
ancient13–60.0320%11 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0921%9 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0331%9 Mar →
ancient13–100.0125%9 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.