Java

Java — CS2 Stats

NO76561198057851433[U:1:97585705]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,115Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,010Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating22,315Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51967 of 258177 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (50 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,115 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,315 +3,603 9 Aug – 8 Sept · 13 days played
18,71222,315peak 22,3159 Aug8 Sept
22,315Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,315
  • +3,603 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,685 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate53.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy14.1%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.461.051.06above
Match win rate50.6%45.7%46.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJavaFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,315 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning52
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility6.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time500ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%−7.3%
first ⅓ avg 32.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 15–15 · nuke, 26 Jul →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · office, 7 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · office, 19 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · office, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 79% over 14mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC2712–1544%0.01
infernoA1710–759%0.02
nukeS1411–379%0.04
mirageD113–827%0.03
anubisA106–460%0.03
dust2D93–633%-0.00
ancientB63–350%0.05
cache—31–233%-0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.00
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

111,106Lifetime kills
1.46K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players
4,052Matches
50.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
12,334MVPs
2,010Hours (in match)
4,468Bombs planted
1,146Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,430
AWP14,747
P2501,525
FAMAS1,384
SSG 081,338

Lifetime map wins

9,678inferno
6,377nuke
2,932dust2
1,958office
1,732train
1,363cbble
824vertigo
124lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

144Matches
56%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
92.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4100%1.3919.5
Nuke3100%2.1121.0
Cache367%1.3316.3
Mirage333%1.0317.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.6%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
503msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
7.66HE damage / grenade
13.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7533% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0732%30 Aug →
nuke13–110.0433%30 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0619%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0620%29 Aug →
inferno13–50.0818%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0522%29 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0437%28 Aug →
nuke13–60.1317%28 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0122%28 Aug →
anubis13–70.0121%28 Aug →
anubis13–50.0618%28 Aug →
office4–130.0130%28 Aug →
inferno11–130.0514%27 Aug →
office8–130.0124%27 Aug →
office13–10.0127%27 Aug →
office13–60.0528%27 Aug →
office13–90.0038%26 Aug →
office13–20.0040%26 Aug →
office6–130.0636%26 Aug →
anubis16–130.0217%22 Aug →
office7–13-0.0430%22 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0320%22 Aug →
dust25–130.0111%22 Aug →
nuke13–80.0329%22 Aug →
nuke13–70.0335%22 Aug →
mirage8–130.0119%21 Aug →
mirage13–90.0817%21 Aug →
office13–50.0921%21 Aug →
anubis9–130.0522%21 Aug →
inferno13–110.0525%21 Aug →
office10–130.0238%19 Aug →
office9–130.0633%19 Aug →
nuke13–80.0823%19 Aug →
ancient13–90.0836%19 Aug →
ancient13–30.0630%19 Aug →
nuke13–110.0723%19 Aug →
cache11–130.0334%19 Aug →
anubis13–70.0530%19 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0430%19 Aug →
nuke13–50.0536%19 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0133%19 Aug →
anubis10–130.0432%18 Aug →
inferno9–130.0330%18 Aug →
mirage11–130.0423%18 Aug →
mirage9–130.0421%18 Aug →
mirage13–90.0631%18 Aug →
mirage13–50.0329%18 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.028%18 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0413%18 Aug →
office9–130.0121%18 Aug →
inferno10–130.0719%17 Aug →
anubis13–30.0626%17 Aug →
inferno13–60.0830%17 Aug →
anubis13–40.0721%17 Aug →
office7–13-0.0125%17 Aug →
ancient11–130.0632%16 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.0132%16 Aug →
dust213–60.0327%16 Aug →
office8–130.0328%16 Aug →
nuke16–130.0224%15 Aug →
office12–120.0517%15 Aug →
inferno16–120.0224%9 Aug →
inferno13–60.0223%9 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0125%8 Aug →
ancient13–30.0930%8 Aug →
inferno13–40.0130%8 Aug →
nuke13–40.0528%8 Aug →
dust213–10.0115%8 Aug →
office12–120.0428%8 Aug →
office9–13-0.0056%7 Aug →
dust211–130.0531%7 Aug →
office13–80.0326%2 Aug →
office13–110.0629%2 Aug →
vertigo4–13-0.0235%1 Aug →
ancient10–130.0935%1 Aug →
office13–5-0.1026%1 Aug →
office4–130.0738%1 Aug →
inferno11–130.0523%31 Jul →
office13–7-0.0522%31 Jul →
inferno13–50.0734%27 Jul →
inferno13–70.0432%27 Jul →
mirage15–150.0326%26 Jul →
mirage9–130.0535%26 Jul →
office13–1-0.0340%26 Jul →
anubis12–120.0252%26 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0517%26 Jul →
nuke15–150.1427%26 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0138%26 Jul →
office11–50.0050%26 Jul →
office8–13-0.0946%24 Jul →
office13–50.0527%24 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0140%24 Jul →
nuke8–130.0223%19 Jul →
overpass2–13-0.0444%19 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0430%18 Jul →
office6–130.0630%18 Jul →
mirage10–130.0326%18 Jul →
vertigo5–90.0136%18 Jul →
nuke1–9-0.1525%18 Jul →
inferno4–9-0.1333%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.