Dakay

Dakay — CS2 Stats

US76561198057237705[U:1:96971977]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

257Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
410Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,546Purple band · top ~26.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 257 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 25 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,546 +1,188 1 Dec14 Sept · 27 days played
14,08817,561peak 17,5611 Dec14 Sept
17,843Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2025-11-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,015 below peak (17,561)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,454 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate33.7%42.7%43.8%10.2% short
Shot accuracy18.9%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.001.02above
Match win rate37.7%43.9%44.7%7.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDakayFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,546 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning37
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44533Last 10044%Win rateLLLLWLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 731ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 747ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 722ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility4.4
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 702ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning3.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time709ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 709ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 27 Nov
41%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 25 Nov
516msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 7 Dec
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 15 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 54% over 24infernoWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24131154%-0.01
ancientB2091145%-0.01
mirageC135838%-0.04
infernoD1331023%-0.04
nukeB115645%-0.04
overpassB105550%-0.01
trainC52340%-0.05
anubis32167%0.01
office1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,091Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1,150Matches
37.7%Match win rate
33.7%Headshot %
18.9%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
1,760MVPs
410Hours (in match)
986Bombs planted
142Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,393dust2
631inferno
518nuke
178vertigo
126train
87cbble
53dust
51office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.65Avg K/D
55.0ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10%0.479.0
Anubis10%0.9314.0
Dust210%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
702msReaction time
18.0%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
6.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 701.6056ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.9513% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient12–16-0.0915%2 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0016%2 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0517%23 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0925%23 Feb
dust213–60.0127%21 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0210%18 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0517%18 Feb
mirage11–13-0.066%15 Feb
overpass9–130.0412%11 Feb
dust213–100.0416%11 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0716%7 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0313%7 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0425%7 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0610%6 Feb
dust213–3-0.0410%6 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0433%4 Feb
ancient13–4-0.0111%4 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0712%4 Feb
dust28–130.0229%1 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0613%1 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0718%31 Jan
dust213–100.0315%31 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0520%31 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0515%31 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0212%31 Jan
dust29–13-0.0513%31 Jan
dust213–7-0.0523%31 Jan
inferno7–2-0.0328%31 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0123%27 Jan
ancient13–80.0412%27 Jan
dust210–13-0.0125%24 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0224%23 Jan
mirage10–13-0.1015%23 Jan
anubis13–90.0615%23 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0517%23 Jan
dust210–130.0216%22 Jan
dust27–13-0.0221%18 Jan
ancient13–60.0010%15 Jan
mirage6–13-0.056%15 Jan
inferno9–13-0.087%15 Jan
dust213–00.0418%15 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0212%15 Jan
dust213–8-0.0124%15 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0620%13 Jan
office5–13-0.0213%13 Jan
overpass16–120.0325%11 Jan
nuke13–80.0015%11 Jan
inferno13–4-0.096%11 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0015%11 Jan
dust213–8-0.0320%11 Jan
ancient15–150.0111%7 Jan
train4–13-0.0529%7 Jan
dust214–16-0.0312%7 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0312%5 Jan
dust211–130.0120%5 Jan
overpass13–7-0.0414%5 Jan
ancient11–130.0016%5 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0118%5 Jan
ancient13–80.0130%4 Jan
dust216–12-0.0424%4 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0411%3 Jan
train8–13-0.140%2 Jan
inferno13–70.0322%31 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0418%29 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0321%29 Dec
inferno10–13-0.0318%29 Dec
ancient13–80.0111%29 Dec
nuke13–11-0.0523%29 Dec
overpass13–60.0413%29 Dec
mirage13–5-0.0016%28 Dec
dust214–16-0.0415%28 Dec
ancient7–130.0324%28 Dec
dust213–50.0118%28 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0523%27 Dec
train13–9-0.0619%27 Dec
inferno10–130.0126%23 Dec
inferno0–4-0.1133%23 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0729%23 Dec
mirage4–13-0.097%22 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0122%22 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0819%22 Dec
nuke13–11-0.0320%22 Dec
dust213–60.0226%19 Dec
train13–30.0213%19 Dec
dust211–13-0.0111%16 Dec
dust213–10-0.0528%16 Dec
ancient13–110.0216%7 Dec
overpass13–9-0.0110%7 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0319%2 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0414%1 Dec
dust27–13-0.0120%29 Nov
overpass13–100.0110%27 Nov
ancient13–50.0622%27 Nov
dust215–150.0215%27 Nov
dust213–8-0.0121%27 Nov
nuke6–13-0.0519%26 Nov
inferno2–13-0.0841%25 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0115%25 Nov
train11–13-0.0321%25 Nov
ancient13–70.0310%25 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →