Juice

Juice — CS2 Stats

76561198056121740[U:1:95856012]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

787Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,890Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+81Tracked matches · now 787
+13.7ppWin rate · 51.8% → 65.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 16 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

25Days played since 2026-08-16

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2740−13
Win rate63%55%+8pp
K/D1.501.62−0.12
Headshot %45%50%−5pp

Measured 14 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate50.6%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy15.0%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.330.991.02above
Match win rate46.3%43.9%44.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJuiceFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning75
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56368Last 10056%Win rateLWWWTLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.0
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.7

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.5
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time513ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–4 · overpass, 10 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 1–10 · mirage, 9 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 10–8 · vertigo, 22 Aug
13–1Biggest win · train, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD1651131%0.02
anubisS1510567%0.07
vertigoA127558%0.07
cacheA116555%0.07
infernoB105550%0.08
trainS97278%0.06
dust2B84450%0.08
ancientS75271%0.05
nukeD72529%0.05
overpass440100%0.09
office110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

128,745Lifetime kills
1.33K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
4,532Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
50.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
13,456MVPs
1,948Hours (in match)
4,895Bombs planted
1,282Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,183
AWP11,942
P2504,071
FAMAS2,644
Tec-92,160
P901,926

Lifetime map wins

16,199dust2
6,733inferno
1,522nuke
1,504train
1,094vertigo
463cbble
165office
59lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
47%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke10%0.8113.0
Mirage10%1.5625.0
Vertigo1100%1.3229.0
Inferno10%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
508msReaction time
61.8%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
14.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train8–130.0232%20 Sept
cache13–80.0921%20 Sept
anubis13–40.0712%20 Sept
vertigo13–110.0722%20 Sept
inferno12–120.1219%20 Sept
mirage6–130.0215%19 Sept
train13–50.0216%19 Sept
anubis13–60.0614%19 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0210%19 Sept
vertigo11–20.0317%19 Sept
overpass13–4-0.0113%19 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0717%19 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0519%18 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0220%18 Sept
ancient13–100.0815%18 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0424%18 Sept
dust213–80.2121%17 Sept
train13–10.2020%17 Sept
ancient13–100.0914%17 Sept
anubis9–130.0322%16 Sept
vertigo13–110.1117%16 Sept
mirage13–90.0615%16 Sept
cache13–60.0412%15 Sept
anubis13–80.0318%15 Sept
inferno13–100.0910%15 Sept
mirage6–130.0014%15 Sept
dust20–13-0.0113%15 Sept
ancient13–80.0811%14 Sept
nuke5–130.1226%13 Sept
mirage13–110.0614%13 Sept
dust29–130.0723%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0015%12 Sept
dust213–8-0.0011%12 Sept
vertigo7–130.0917%12 Sept
inferno13–60.0917%11 Sept
cache7–130.0623%11 Sept
train13–110.0619%11 Sept
nuke12–120.0312%11 Sept
dust213–40.1921%11 Sept
inferno13–110.0312%11 Sept
overpass13–40.2319%10 Sept
mirage13–70.0214%10 Sept
anubis10–00.0511%10 Sept
vertigo6–130.0927%10 Sept
mirage1–10-0.1040%9 Sept
inferno11–130.0721%8 Sept
cache5–130.0114%8 Sept
vertigo12–120.0523%8 Sept
mirage13–20.1512%8 Sept
anubis4–130.1222%8 Sept
cache13–110.1923%8 Sept
dust213–70.0619%7 Sept
anubis13–100.0616%7 Sept
mirage15–150.1518%7 Sept
inferno9–130.0515%7 Sept
office13–11-0.0030%6 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0017%6 Sept
inferno13–110.0627%6 Sept
mirage12–120.0421%5 Sept
ancient13–80.0414%4 Sept
nuke13–30.0220%4 Sept
vertigo13–70.0718%4 Sept
train13–100.0423%4 Sept
cache13–40.1524%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0922%4 Sept
dust27–130.0532%4 Sept
nuke6–130.1028%4 Sept
anubis13–100.0616%3 Sept
cache13–110.1931%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0221%3 Sept
overpass13–100.0413%3 Sept
mirage12–120.0811%3 Sept
nuke13–70.1116%3 Sept
inferno10–130.1226%3 Sept
ancient5–130.0215%3 Sept
vertigo13–60.0423%3 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0314%2 Sept
overpass13–10.1120%2 Sept
ancient13–30.0428%2 Sept
vertigo13–110.0112%2 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0612%31 Aug
mirage13–90.1033%22 Aug
cache13–100.0217%22 Aug
vertigo10–80.2120%22 Aug
train13–50.1127%22 Aug
train11–130.0211%19 Aug
anubis13–70.0716%19 Aug
cache12–120.0722%19 Aug
vertigo10–130.099%18 Aug
train13–60.0525%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.0312%18 Aug
anubis13–20.158%18 Aug
inferno8–130.0918%17 Aug
anubis8–130.0529%17 Aug
train13–30.0313%17 Aug
anubis11–130.2014%17 Aug
cache4–130.0111%16 Aug
anubis13–100.1316%16 Aug
anubis13–110.0621%16 Aug
dust212–120.0619%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →