Nazgul

Nazgul — CS2 Stats

76561198054430152[U:1:94164424]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

765Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,329Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,856Purple band · top ~25% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 987 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 15,856 → 15,856
0Faceit ELO · 987 → 987
+2Tracked matches · now 765
+3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 17 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,856 +736 20 Jul29 Aug · 5 days played
15,12015,856peak 15,85620 Jul29 Aug
15,964Peak Premier in tracked matches
987Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 987
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 64 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 15,856
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,144 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate47.2%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy15.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.231.021.04above
Match win rate41.1%44.7%45.2%4.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNazgulFACEITLevel 5 · 987 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,856 · Purple bandPEAK ELO987csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning52
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time562ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 29 Jul
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 14 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 19 Jul
13–1Biggest win · cache, 17 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC30131743%-0.01
anubisB28141450%-0.01
mirageA127558%0.02
cacheB115645%-0.01
infernoD93633%0.01
dust2S64267%0.03
nuke31233%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

101,802Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
4,461Matches
41.1%Match win rate
47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
9,489MVPs
1,845Hours (in match)
5,627Bombs planted
1,035Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,891
AWP10,143
FAMAS2,235
P2501,829
P901,738
MP71,481

Lifetime map wins

9,696dust2
2,906inferno
889cbble
831nuke
576train
247vertigo
194office
158italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

411Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
70.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9354%1.0015.2
Inferno5754%0.9813.9
Anubis5343%0.9914.4
Mirage2548%0.8513.1
Dust21861%1.1015.3
Overpass1331%0.679.9
Cache1050%1.1312.0
Nuke425%0.8115.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
569msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
32.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
5.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5458% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.0428%11 Sept
anubis10–13-0.074%11 Sept
anubis13–60.0414%28 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0333%21 Aug
cache13–7-0.0413%21 Aug
ancient13–110.0119%21 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0247%14 Aug
anubis13–50.0016%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0322%14 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0327%14 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0126%14 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0715%14 Aug
mirage13–60.0723%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0332%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0213%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0022%9 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0411%9 Aug
cache11–13-0.0040%9 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0817%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0116%7 Aug
ancient9–130.1119%6 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0518%5 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0614%5 Aug
mirage8–130.0026%5 Aug
anubis8–130.0625%5 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0123%5 Aug
cache11–13-0.0215%4 Aug
anubis13–20.0728%3 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0018%3 Aug
inferno9–130.0925%3 Aug
ancient13–16-0.046%1 Aug
anubis4–130.0122%1 Aug
ancient13–40.0530%1 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0414%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0613%31 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0226%31 Jul
ancient13–90.0110%31 Jul
dust213–11-0.0320%31 Jul
cache13–50.0139%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0215%31 Jul
mirage13–60.0620%31 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0521%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0314%31 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0216%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0221%30 Jul
anubis13–110.0821%30 Jul
anubis4–13-0.046%29 Jul
inferno6–130.0321%29 Jul
dust213–20.1130%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0022%29 Jul
nuke19–220.0221%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0419%28 Jul
inferno10–130.0421%28 Jul
cache15–15-0.0020%27 Jul
ancient13–100.0215%27 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0117%26 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%26 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0213%26 Jul
ancient9–130.0213%26 Jul
ancient11–130.0118%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0118%26 Jul
ancient13–40.0119%26 Jul
ancient11–130.0019%26 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0019%26 Jul
inferno13–70.0323%25 Jul
ancient13–50.0416%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0928%25 Jul
ancient19–16-0.0316%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0122%25 Jul
cache13–4-0.0322%25 Jul
anubis13–60.0715%24 Jul
mirage14–160.0515%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.098%23 Jul
ancient8–130.0216%23 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0111%23 Jul
mirage12–160.017%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0616%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0322%22 Jul
mirage4–130.0333%22 Jul
dust213–110.0115%22 Jul
ancient13–100.0221%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0119%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0638%20 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0116%20 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1219%20 Jul
anubis11–4-0.0142%20 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0021%19 Jul
cache13–8-0.0324%19 Jul
dust211–130.0428%19 Jul
dust213–60.0320%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0018%19 Jul
nuke16–130.0315%18 Jul
anubis11–130.0132%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0321%18 Jul
anubis14–160.0116%18 Jul
cache5–130.0218%18 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0028%18 Jul
cache13–10.0630%17 Jul
mirage16–130.0320%17 Jul
cache11–13-0.0121%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →