Dave — CS2 Stats

76561198054379184[U:1:94113456]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,503Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#126099 of 251249 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,522 +87 6 Apr – 10 Jun · 7 days played

16,799Peak Premier in tracked matches

46Days played since 2025-04-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70

Positioning60

Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY33–56–11Last 10033%Win rateWLLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 633ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 647ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0

Utility3.6

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0

Positioning6.0

Utility3.6

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels5.5

Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time644ms+11ms

first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms

Headshot accuracy22.5%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 8–13 · cache, 28 Sept →

46%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · vertigo, 28 Oct →

375msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · cache, 20 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · dust2, 9 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 12mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	34	12–22	35%	-0.03
dust2	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.02
vertigo	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.03
ancient	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
mirage	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.02
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.02
office	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.01
golden	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
palacio	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

245Matches

54%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

85.0ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	42	45%	1.01	16.1
Inferno	23	57%	1.08	16.7
Ancient	22	55%	1.21	18.9
Vertigo	16	62%	1.03	16.1
Anubis	15	80%	1.33	17.5
Dust2	11	36%	0.82	14.2
Cache	6	67%	1.05	13.2
Nuke	6	50%	1.04	17.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.3%Spray accuracy

80.8%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

638msReaction time

58.6%T opening success

45.8%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

6.22HE damage / grenade

6.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4182 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	0.02	21%	5 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	21%	2 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	29%	2 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.05	16%	2 Oct →
cache	1–13	-0.04	20%	2 Oct →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	7%	1 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.03	29%	30 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.06	15%	30 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.01	17%	29 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.03	14%	29 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.10	25%	28 Sept →
ancient	15–15	0.03	28%	28 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.03	28%	27 Sept →
cache	12–12	-0.03	18%	27 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.11	0%	26 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.04	41%	26 Sept →
cache	13–3	-0.04	15%	26 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.05	28%	26 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.01	28%	22 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.08	17%	22 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.00	37%	22 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.11	0%	20 Sept →
cache	5–13	-0.05	14%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–2	0.00	22%	18 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.09	38%	18 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.05	27%	15 Sept →
cache	3–13	-0.07	36%	15 Sept →
cache	12–12	0.04	26%	15 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.03	37%	13 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.05	21%	13 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.03	20%	13 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.00	21%	13 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.00	27%	11 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	31%	1 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.01	36%	1 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.04	33%	27 May →
cache	5–13	-0.04	29%	27 May →
cache	7–13	-0.04	11%	26 May →
cache	12–12	-0.04	24%	24 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	25%	23 May →
office	13–10	0.03	19%	23 May →
cache	6–13	-0.01	23%	23 May →
cache	13–10	-0.05	14%	17 May →
cache	13–8	-0.06	25%	17 May →
cache	13–7	0.00	32%	29 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	30%	31 Mar →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	21%	31 Mar →
overpass	5–13	-0.06	25%	12 Jan →
nuke	12–12	-0.05	27%	12 Jan →
vertigo	3–13	-0.01	46%	28 Oct →
office	12–12	0.05	22%	6 Oct →
office	11–13	-0.03	22%	6 Oct →
office	12–12	-0.04	17%	6 Oct →
golden	11–13	0.03	21%	2 Oct →
palacio	13–4	-0.09	35%	2 Oct →
ancient	3–13	0.00	13%	31 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.02	32%	31 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	21%	20 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	27%	20 Jun →
train	5–13	-0.01	30%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.05	26%	17 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	22%	15 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	20%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	32%	10 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.04	15%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–1	-0.00	6%	9 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	24%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	26%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.04	22%	28 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	28%	26 May →
vertigo	3–13	-0.05	32%	26 May →
vertigo	5–13	-0.10	25%	25 May →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	22%	25 May →
mirage	11–13	0.05	26%	25 May →
mirage	11–13	0.05	17%	24 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	14%	24 May →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	38%	24 May →
ancient	9–2	0.02	27%	24 May →
office	7–13	-0.10	19%	22 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	24%	20 May →
overpass	13–10	-0.02	20%	20 May →
vertigo	5–13	-0.07	43%	17 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	28%	17 May →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	11%	14 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	26%	14 May →
inferno	13–6	0.03	28%	29 Apr →
vertigo	13–3	-0.01	33%	29 Apr →
vertigo	11–13	-0.03	24%	29 Apr →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	15%	22 Apr →
vertigo	13–10	0.01	36%	22 Apr →
inferno	10–13	0.06	35%	11 Apr →
dust2	16–14	0.01	17%	7 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	26%	7 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	17%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	13%	7 Apr →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	10%	6 Apr →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	9%	6 Apr →
office	6–13	-0.10	16%	6 Apr →
vertigo	13–2	-0.01	18%	6 Apr →
train	10–13	0.02	24%	6 Apr →