JuliaPapayaa

JuliaPapayaa — CS2 Stats

DE76561198115566403[U:1:155300675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,952Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,126Top 10% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11837 of 251249 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+453Premier CS Rating · 25,673 → 26,126

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,126 +3,590 30 Aug – 11 Oct · 19 days played
22,53627,035peak 27,03530 Aug11 Oct
27,091Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 909 below peak (27,035)
  • +1,374 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,874 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJuliaPapayaaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER26,126 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning45
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–48–7Last 10045%Win rateLWWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.2
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time558ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 14 Sept →
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · cache, 3 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 1 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 40% over 63
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC6325–3840%0.01
ancientC125–742%-0.00
anubisS107–370%0.00
mirageS64–267%-0.01
inferno—31–233%-0.04
nuke—32–167%0.01
dust2—20–20%-0.04
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

216Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
76.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache1164%1.2011.9
Ancient475%1.7619.5
Mirage30%1.3121.3
Nuke10%0.9416.0
Inferno10%0.7512.0
Overpass10%0.4510.0
Dust21100%1.0010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
558msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
27.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
13.92HE damage / grenade
6.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3814% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 63 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0122%11 Oct →
anubis13–30.0319%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.0714%11 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.009%8 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0416%8 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0426%8 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.067%8 Oct →
cache11–130.0421%7 Oct →
cache13–60.0611%7 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0215%7 Oct →
cache13–60.0535%7 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0012%6 Oct →
cache6–130.0326%6 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0910%6 Oct →
ancient13–40.0519%6 Oct →
cache13–60.1019%5 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0420%5 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0310%5 Oct →
nuke13–50.1221%5 Oct →
cache5–130.0417%4 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0721%4 Oct →
cache12–120.0426%4 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0417%3 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.047%2 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0632%2 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0119%2 Oct →
anubis13–70.0218%1 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0521%1 Oct →
inferno6–10.0125%1 Oct →
ancient2–130.0219%1 Oct →
anubis13–70.0322%1 Oct →
cache8–13-0.037%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0213%30 Sept →
cache7–130.0312%30 Sept →
cache8–130.0629%30 Sept →
cache13–110.0219%29 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.1014%29 Sept →
anubis13–90.0317%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0717%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.1021%28 Sept →
cache13–110.0523%28 Sept →
cache12–120.0516%28 Sept →
cache13–110.0418%27 Sept →
cache12–120.0011%27 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0511%26 Sept →
cache13–80.0620%26 Sept →
cache13–30.0518%26 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0522%26 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0711%26 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0411%26 Sept →
cache13–70.0315%25 Sept →
cache13–70.026%25 Sept →
cache13–70.0222%25 Sept →
cache13–70.0818%22 Sept →
cache6–130.0431%22 Sept →
cache13–80.029%22 Sept →
cache1–130.0519%20 Sept →
cache5–130.0020%20 Sept →
cache9–13-0.047%20 Sept →
cache11–130.0217%20 Sept →
cache13–110.0420%20 Sept →
anubis13–20.0420%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0116%18 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0321%16 Sept →
cache13–90.0216%16 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0429%15 Sept →
cache3–130.0132%15 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0416%15 Sept →
cache13–50.1515%14 Sept →
cache12–120.0213%14 Sept →
cache4–130.0124%13 Sept →
cache13–100.0610%13 Sept →
cache11–130.0113%13 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0418%13 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0222%11 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0018%11 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0524%11 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.049%10 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0527%10 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0417%9 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0123%9 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0015%8 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0213%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.057%7 Sept →
cache13–60.0221%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0329%5 Sept →
anubis13–70.0123%5 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0328%4 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0229%4 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.035%4 Sept →
anubis13–30.0033%4 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0123%4 Sept →
mirage13–70.0016%4 Sept →
cache13–90.0459%3 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0320%3 Sept →
cache13–60.0121%31 Aug →
ancient13–60.088%30 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0118%28 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0438%28 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0417%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.