harrow

harrow — CS2 Stats

HU76561198053092809[U:1:92827081]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

462Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
832Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,340Purple band · top ~19.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 462 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 28 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,340 +3,772 30 May9 Sept · 26 days played
12,95117,982peak 17,98230 May9 Sept
18,168Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 642 below peak (17,982)
  • +36 over 30 days · steady
  • +4,123 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,660 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.0%44.9%45.8%8.8% short
Shot accuracy15.9%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.981.041.050.07 short
Match win rate35.9%45.3%45.7%9.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGharrowFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,340 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning43
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility4.2
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.3
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time572ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 7–0 · dust2, 1 Aug
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 6 Jul
344msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 23 Jul
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 21 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 42% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B32171553%-0.01
infernoC31131842%0.00
ancientB168850%-0.01
nukeS97278%0.02
mirageA85363%0.00
cache31233%0.03
overpass110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,681Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
2,259Matches
35.9%Match win rate
37.0%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,087MVPs
832Hours (in match)
2,543Bombs planted
377Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,955dust2
4,741inferno
1,153nuke
395train
376cbble
58dust
50office
37assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
57%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
75.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23348%0.9813.3
Inferno2162%1.3816.2
Mirage1656%1.1216.1
Cache1275%1.2917.1
Anubis850%0.8514.8
Ancient862%1.1814.0
Nuke333%1.1412.0
Overpass10%0.509.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
568msReaction time
15.8%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
9.86HE damage / grenade
6.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4839% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4045 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.8415% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0212%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0114%25 Aug
dust213–6-0.063%24 Aug
inferno3–13-0.048%24 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0311%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0314%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.029%17 Aug
dust213–100.0013%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0214%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0918%13 Aug
dust215–15-0.0213%13 Aug
cache7–13-0.0112%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0317%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.048%1 Aug
dust27–00.2418%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0530%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0513%31 Jul
ancient13–20.0413%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0221%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.034%22 Jul
ancient13–40.045%22 Jul
dust213–4-0.0025%21 Jul
dust213–3-0.0115%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0015%21 Jul
nuke7–20.0121%21 Jul
inferno13–00.1017%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.0328%20 Jul
nuke13–110.0223%20 Jul
dust22–13-0.060%20 Jul
dust211–13-0.0120%19 Jul
dust213–16-0.0523%14 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0311%14 Jul
ancient6–13-0.099%14 Jul
dust213–7-0.0415%13 Jul
dust213–8-0.0530%8 Jul
dust213–40.0115%7 Jul
dust213–20.0322%7 Jul
dust213–20.0534%6 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0218%6 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0022%6 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0313%2 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0115%2 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0118%2 Jul
inferno13–70.0319%2 Jul
dust213–60.0417%2 Jul
dust28–13-0.0820%1 Jul
inferno13–70.1017%1 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0415%30 Jun
dust213–10.0016%30 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0018%30 Jun
inferno13–160.0621%30 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0228%28 Jun
mirage13–10.0531%27 Jun
nuke13–20.0718%27 Jun
ancient13–100.0614%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.0022%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0714%27 Jun
dust216–140.0320%26 Jun
inferno7–9-0.128%26 Jun
inferno9–30.0722%26 Jun
inferno8–80.0419%26 Jun
dust28–13-0.0311%24 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0219%23 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0115%23 Jun
inferno6–13-0.038%23 Jun
mirage13–110.0130%17 Jun
cache11–130.0131%17 Jun
inferno9–20.0810%15 Jun
inferno5–9-0.1212%15 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0812%14 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0619%14 Jun
inferno9–40.1423%14 Jun
inferno4–9-0.1310%14 Jun
dust28–13-0.0418%14 Jun
inferno9–70.0424%14 Jun
inferno9–20.0817%14 Jun
nuke13–60.1113%12 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0719%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0215%10 Jun
dust212–120.0317%10 Jun
mirage13–90.0619%9 Jun
dust210–130.0928%9 Jun
dust213–11-0.0529%6 Jun
inferno10–130.0327%2 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0615%2 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0423%1 Jun
inferno13–50.0827%1 Jun
dust23–13-0.0424%1 Jun
ancient16–140.028%31 May
ancient13–3-0.0015%31 May
nuke13–90.0213%31 May
ancient16–130.0013%30 May
dust26–13-0.0517%30 May
mirage13–30.0312%30 May
nuke13–10-0.0311%30 May
cache13–20.0819%30 May
mirage13–110.0315%30 May
ancient9–13-0.0215%29 May
dust211–13-0.059%28 May
inferno11–130.0611%28 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →