timmm_g

timmm_g — CS2 Stats

US76561198052983326[U:1:92717598]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

585Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,747Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,133 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,133 → 1,133
+4Tracked matches · now 585
+3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,133 +0 15 Sept – 29 Sept · 3 observations
1,1331,133peak 1,13315 Sept29 Sept
1,133Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2026-06-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,133
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 68 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8——
Win rate88%——
K/D3.80——
Headshot %90%——

Measured 15 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,153), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate66.7%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy13.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.401.031.05above
Match win rate40.1%45.2%45.7%5.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtimmm_gFACEITLevel 6 · 1,133 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,133csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning53
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–53Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.8
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.3
Utility6.8
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time553ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 11–0 · dust2, 13 Jul →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 21 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 1 Sept →
11–0Biggest win · dust2, 13 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 32mirageWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3218–1456%0.01
mirageD175–1229%-0.01
ancientB137–654%0.02
infernoB115–645%0.01
cacheD93–633%-0.00
anubisA95–456%0.00
nukeB84–450%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,843Lifetime kills
1.40K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
2,106Matches
40.1%Match win rate
66.7%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 6 players
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
3,379MVPs
1,568Hours (in match)
2,039Bombs planted
752Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,741
AWP2,908
MP92,025
FAMAS1,627
P2501,162

Lifetime map wins

5,798dust2
3,229inferno
781nuke
311train
242vertigo
95cbble
37bank
37lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

361Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
73.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29853%1.1214.8
Mirage7552%1.0315.2
Ancient4340%1.1416.0
Inferno3768%0.9815.1
Anubis2744%1.1314.5
Nuke2446%0.8914.0
Overpass1346%1.0915.0
Cache1250%1.0113.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
556msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
18.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5385% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0020%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0317%7 Oct →
cache16–120.0218%6 Oct →
inferno13–50.0912%30 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0016%22 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0511%22 Sept →
nuke13–50.0825%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0319%16 Sept →
anubis13–110.1223%16 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0322%12 Sept →
mirage6–130.0330%12 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0613%3 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0422%3 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0513%2 Sept →
anubis13–50.009%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.0015%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0511%1 Sept →
dust216–140.0014%1 Sept →
cache2–13-0.095%31 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0316%30 Aug →
ancient13–70.0513%30 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0414%29 Aug →
ancient8–130.0227%29 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0519%29 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0619%28 Aug →
cache7–13-0.026%28 Aug →
anubis16–140.009%26 Aug →
dust213–100.0719%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0221%25 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0318%25 Aug →
dust27–12-0.0218%23 Aug →
dust213–90.0315%21 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0210%21 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.052%20 Aug →
dust213–100.0226%20 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0116%20 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0824%20 Aug →
cache13–100.0321%15 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.077%15 Aug →
inferno13–110.0119%14 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0620%13 Aug →
ancient11–130.0318%13 Aug →
dust215–19-0.0515%12 Aug →
ancient13–30.0642%11 Aug →
ancient16–130.0118%11 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0111%10 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0423%10 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.016%6 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0314%4 Aug →
ancient16–140.1421%31 Jul →
nuke13–50.0113%30 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0215%30 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0422%28 Jul →
dust213–60.0824%27 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0114%23 Jul →
dust213–60.2018%21 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0442%21 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0115%20 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0019%16 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0116%14 Jul →
dust211–00.2722%13 Jul →
anubis13–60.016%12 Jul →
dust213–90.0115%12 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0419%11 Jul →
cache13–60.0518%11 Jul →
cache9–130.0221%9 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0113%9 Jul →
inferno13–30.1522%8 Jul →
dust213–70.0120%8 Jul →
mirage7–130.0219%8 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0121%7 Jul →
cache11–130.0218%7 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0518%29 Jun →
dust214–16-0.0125%26 Jun →
ancient10–130.0317%23 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0112%22 Jun →
mirage11–130.0227%22 Jun →
anubis14–160.0115%21 Jun →
dust213–90.0624%21 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0316%20 Jun →
inferno13–90.0427%18 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0126%16 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0120%16 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0616%13 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0725%13 Jun →
ancient13–80.0317%12 Jun →
ancient13–100.0114%12 Jun →
dust213–60.0629%11 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0511%9 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0514%9 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0615%8 Jun →
ancient13–160.0115%8 Jun →
dust27–130.0821%8 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0214%7 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0115%7 Jun →
nuke11–130.0119%6 Jun →
dust212–16-0.0029%6 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0129%5 Jun →
mirage2–130.0321%5 Jun →
mirage13–90.0124%4 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.