hey hoe! — CS2 Stats

76561198051155032[U:1:90889304]

960Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.0 Learning

Premier CS Rating4,762Grey band · top ~79.8% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 2 · 501 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43

Positioning24

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38–60–2Last 10038%Win rateLWLWWTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.3

Aggression1.4

Utility4.1

Positioning2.4

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch0.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3

Positioning2.4

Utility4.1

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.06

Reaction time704ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 724ms → last ⅓ avg 704ms

Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 0% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	26	14–12	54%	-0.03
inferno	D	19	4–15	21%	-0.06
dust2	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.04
ancient	D	13	3–10	23%	-0.05
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.06
anubis	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.06
nuke	D	7	0–7	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches

41%Win rate

0.62Avg K/D

60.6ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	8	38%	0.81	12.3
Anubis	3	67%	0.72	11.0
Inferno	3	100%	0.76	11.7
Nuke	3	33%	0.58	10.0
Ancient	2	50%	0.66	10.0
Vertigo	2	0%	0.52	10.0
Train	2	0%	0.38	7.0
Dust2	1	100%	0.50	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.3%Spray accuracy

76.8%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

711msReaction time

18.5%T opening success

34.6%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

1.8%Flash assists

9.69HE damage / grenade

5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 711.2558ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.4515% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	5–13	-0.02	21%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	28%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.13	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	26%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	23%	14 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	25%	14 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.08	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	17%	14 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.09	13%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.06	13%	13 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	12%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	13%	12 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	19%	12 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	18%	12 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.11	18%	10 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.08	14%	8 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	19%	8 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	21%	6 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	11%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.07	20%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	16%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	19%	30 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.07	23%	30 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	16%	30 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	26%	30 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	20%	30 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.09	27%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	6%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	9%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.01	12%	25 Jul →
dust2	12–5	-0.04	12%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.11	13%	24 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.05	20%	24 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	16%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	6%	22 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	5%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.09	19%	21 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.09	21%	21 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.11	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	12%	21 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	20%	20 Jul →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.09	18%	20 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.08	30%	20 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.07	21%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.10	31%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	30%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	11%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.07	20%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	18 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.09	22%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–1	-0.02	13%	17 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	4%	17 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.07	15%	16 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.06	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.07	6%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.11	20%	15 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	19%	15 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.06	7%	26 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	8%	22 Jun →
ancient	0–13	-0.09	12%	22 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	20%	22 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	24%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	12%	21 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	13%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	18%	20 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	14%	20 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.10	17%	18 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.08	9%	18 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.09	15%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.06	19%	17 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	10%	31 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	17%	31 May →
inferno	13–10	0.01	11%	30 May →
ancient	13–3	0.07	21%	30 May →
dust2	13–4	0.02	4%	30 May →
ancient	12–16	-0.06	17%	29 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.03	20%	29 May →
dust2	7–13	0.00	26%	28 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.06	12%	28 May →
inferno	13–16	0.01	7%	28 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	21%	28 May →
mirage	13–11	0.05	13%	28 May →
dust2	13–8	0.02	18%	28 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	14%	26 May →
mirage	13–10	0.01	13%	26 May →
mirage	2–10	-0.07	21%	19 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	11%	15 May →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	25%	15 May →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	6%	3 May →
mirage	13–6	0.08	19%	3 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	10%	2 May →
ancient	12–16	-0.04	11%	2 May →
mirage	13–4	0.02	21%	2 May →