Steblovsky

Steblovsky — CS2 Stats

BT76561198051094411[U:1:90828683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,163Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,842Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,626Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,163 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,626 → 17,626
0Faceit ELO · 1,163 → 1,163
+6Tracked matches · now 1,163
−3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,626 -189 17 Sept – 9 Nov · 10 days played
16,92017,815peak 17,81517 Sept9 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,163 +0 3 Sept – 9 Nov · 5 observations
1,1631,163peak 1,1633 Sept9 Nov
18,167Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,163Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,163
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 38 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 189 below peak (17,815)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,374 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches7——
Win rate29%——
K/D0.98——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 9 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate47.0%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy14.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.971.021.030.06 short
Match win rate44.0%44.7%45.2%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSteblovskyFACEITLevel 5 · 1,163 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,626 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,163csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning44
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWLWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.3pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility6.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time599ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 15 Oct →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 12 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · mirage, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 17ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2815–1354%-0.02
infernoA1710–759%0.00
ancientD155–1033%-0.03
dust2B147–750%-0.02
cacheA148–657%-0.02
nukeB63–350%-0.02
anubis—42–250%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.00
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,496Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
3,679Matches
44.0%Match win rate
47.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,372MVPs
1,506Hours (in match)
4,518Bombs planted
684Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,450
AWP8,665
FAMAS2,259
MP72,033
P2501,906
P901,898

Lifetime map wins

4,217dust2
3,539inferno
1,648nuke
927cbble
737train
91vertigo
40office
39lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

326Matches
52%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
65.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6052%0.8313.4
Ancient4951%0.8212.0
Inferno3938%0.8313.6
Dust23863%0.8412.3
Cache3247%0.8611.7
Anubis2352%0.9413.8
Nuke2339%0.9412.8
Overpass2065%1.0113.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
590msReaction time
40.8%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
12.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.7934% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0719%13 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0119%13 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0230%12 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0916%12 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.009%12 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0122%11 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0818%8 Nov →
inferno25–22-0.0117%8 Nov →
mirage16–19-0.0220%8 Nov →
anubis14–16-0.089%8 Nov →
ancient13–5-0.0514%8 Nov →
mirage13–4-0.098%8 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0518%7 Nov →
cache13–11-0.0523%7 Nov →
dust211–13-0.068%7 Nov →
dust216–130.0220%7 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0511%7 Nov →
nuke10–130.0213%5 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0912%5 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.049%4 Nov →
dust213–40.0223%4 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0313%4 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0424%4 Nov →
mirage14–16-0.0225%31 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0223%30 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0117%29 Oct →
cache13–100.0121%29 Oct →
mirage7–130.0211%29 Oct →
mirage13–50.0221%25 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0429%25 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.009%25 Oct →
cache7–13-0.029%25 Oct →
inferno9–40.0622%24 Oct →
inferno9–10.1827%24 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0929%24 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0920%24 Oct →
overpass13–6-0.0021%23 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0518%23 Oct →
vertigo3–2-0.010%23 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0723%23 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0022%23 Oct →
anubis13–50.0027%22 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0411%22 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0416%22 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0610%22 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0118%22 Oct →
cache7–13-0.028%22 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0221%21 Oct →
cache6–130.0214%21 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0715%21 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.109%21 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0019%21 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0014%21 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0115%20 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0420%20 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0421%20 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.058%19 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0514%19 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0013%19 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0012%18 Oct →
dust28–130.0230%18 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0117%17 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.1115%17 Oct →
mirage22–20-0.0019%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0116%17 Oct →
mirage13–100.0615%17 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0313%17 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0619%17 Oct →
inferno9–20.3622%15 Oct →
mirage11–130.0021%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.095%9 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.056%9 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0220%9 Oct →
inferno13–80.0111%9 Oct →
ancient8–130.0313%9 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0718%6 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.017%6 Oct →
cache16–14-0.049%6 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0518%6 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0913%5 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.070%5 Oct →
mirage10–130.0719%5 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0220%5 Oct →
cache13–110.0117%4 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0222%4 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0013%4 Oct →
inferno13–70.0413%4 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0316%4 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.027%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0314%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0512%4 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0627%2 Oct →
dust23–13-0.065%2 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0714%2 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0317%2 Oct →
cache13–20.0920%2 Oct →
mirage16–120.0214%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0019%1 Oct →
nuke13–90.0419%1 Oct →
cache9–13-0.115%1 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.