i enjoy billy herrington

i enjoy billy herrington — CS2 Stats

76561198050874247[U:1:90608519]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

461Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,615Purple band · top ~22% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 May 2025 (546 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,615 +3,098 23 Feb – 7 May · 16 days played
13,51716,615peak 16,61523 Feb7 May
16,822Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-01-25

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,615
  • +110 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,385 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGi enjoy billy herringtonFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,615 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning55
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLWWLWLTTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.5
Utility7.6
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time658ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–4 · train, 23 Feb →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · ancient, 31 Jan →
461msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 9 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 19dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB3216–1650%-0.02
nukeA1911–858%-0.02
infernoC188–1044%-0.02
dust2D82–625%-0.04
trainC83–538%-0.00
anubisD82–625%-0.04
mirageD72–529%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

588Matches
48%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
69.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5551%0.8413.8
Nuke3754%0.9415.5
Inferno2438%0.8313.1
Train1850%0.9414.5
Dust21650%0.8112.7
Mirage1145%0.7012.0
Anubis729%0.6611.3
Vertigo250%8.2413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
92.2%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
658msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
5.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4073% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.0484% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.047%7 May →
dust25–13-0.0710%3 May →
ancient13–5-0.0612%3 May →
mirage13–80.0115%3 May →
inferno6–13-0.0111%27 Apr →
dust213–100.0110%27 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0510%12 Apr →
nuke15–150.0113%12 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.037%4 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0410%1 Apr →
nuke13–50.0216%30 Mar →
inferno13–50.0318%29 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0623%28 Mar →
ancient13–100.0211%28 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.056%28 Mar →
train11–130.0310%27 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.0412%27 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.078%27 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0222%26 Mar →
nuke9–130.0013%26 Mar →
inferno13–70.036%26 Mar →
train13–90.0319%25 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0820%25 Mar →
inferno13–16-0.056%23 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.044%23 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0122%23 Mar →
nuke22–18-0.0322%16 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.049%16 Mar →
inferno13–110.0013%16 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0710%15 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.086%15 Mar →
inferno10–130.0012%15 Mar →
train3–13-0.0215%12 Mar →
ancient13–20.0313%12 Mar →
nuke16–12-0.0210%12 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.049%9 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0216%9 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.013%8 Mar →
inferno13–5-0.016%8 Mar →
train13–16-0.0517%7 Mar →
nuke13–100.0111%7 Mar →
nuke16–13-0.0212%7 Mar →
ancient8–130.0514%7 Mar →
nuke13–70.0215%7 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0712%7 Mar →
ancient13–50.0516%3 Mar →
nuke9–130.0221%3 Mar →
ancient13–70.0613%2 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0415%2 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.008%1 Mar →
train13–80.0224%1 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0115%28 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0810%28 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0712%28 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0111%28 Feb →
ancient13–40.0014%28 Feb →
ancient13–90.0310%28 Feb →
ancient13–16-0.0417%28 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0011%28 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0614%27 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0714%26 Feb →
anubis13–4-0.064%25 Feb →
train9–13-0.084%23 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0412%23 Feb →
train13–40.0813%23 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0312%22 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0410%19 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0418%19 Feb →
anubis13–110.0222%19 Feb →
ancient13–50.0512%19 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0719%18 Feb →
inferno13–30.0518%18 Feb →
train8–13-0.0416%17 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0311%17 Feb →
ancient16–140.019%17 Feb →
inferno13–110.0010%16 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0610%15 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0910%15 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.039%15 Feb →
inferno9–130.0212%13 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0014%13 Feb →
mirage5–130.0613%13 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0411%12 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.018%12 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0413%12 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0418%11 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0322%11 Feb →
ancient19–17-0.0514%11 Feb →
ancient19–17-0.0015%9 Feb →
ancient13–70.0314%9 Feb →
nuke12–16-0.088%9 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.0217%5 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0622%2 Feb →
ancient13–1-0.0228%31 Jan →
nuke13–100.0022%29 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0714%29 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0214%29 Jan →
nuke13–7-0.0812%29 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.079%25 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0518%25 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.