PraviKore

PraviKore — CS2 Stats

SI76561198050622502[U:1:90356774]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,435Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,222Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#30432 of 225928 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,629 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 26 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,826 +1,384 29 Apr24 May · 5 days played
22,44223,826peak 23,82629 Apr24 May
23,826Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,629Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,629
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 122 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.0%45.7%46.8%7.8% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.661.051.060.40 short
Match win rate42.4%45.7%46.3%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPraviKoreFACEITLevel 7 · 1,629 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,629csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning34
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53443Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +6.7pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 711ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility2.3
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning3.4
Utility2.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact0.6

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time648ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 20 May
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–4 · ancient, 7 May
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 6 May
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 20 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 19mirageWeakest map · 45% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22101245%-0.05
ancientB22111150%-0.04
anubisA1912763%-0.04
cacheB147750%-0.03
dust2A127558%-0.05
overpassB63350%-0.05
nuke21150%-0.05
inferno220100%-0.04
vertigo1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,539Lifetime kills
0.66K/D
6,182Matches
42.4%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
7,172MVPs
2,222Hours (in match)
2,657Bombs planted
701Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,113
AWP12,147
FAMAS2,056
P2501,619
P901,394

Lifetime map wins

7,791dust2
4,538inferno
1,041cbble
876vertigo
707train
636nuke
71office
55lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

922Matches
55%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
55.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24853%0.649.5
Ancient20163%0.6910.7
Anubis14759%0.7211.5
Dust211447%0.6110.5
Inferno5949%0.6210.2
Overpass5558%0.6010.2
Cache1747%0.6410.2
Train1533%0.609.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
642msReaction time
21.2%T opening success
29.6%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
1.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3095 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.2062% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–8-0.0237%1 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0527%1 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0428%27 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0513%27 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0125%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.068%17 Jun
cache7–13-0.0025%17 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0717%11 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0519%11 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0829%10 Jun
cache13–8-0.0511%10 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0532%10 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0615%8 Jun
cache5–13-0.0322%4 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0519%4 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0522%31 May
cache16–12-0.0414%31 May
mirage4–13-0.100%28 May
cache13–9-0.0319%27 May
cache6–13-0.046%26 May
mirage8–130.0430%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0718%25 May
dust213–7-0.0826%25 May
ancient13–5-0.0220%25 May
cache8–13-0.067%25 May
anubis9–13-0.0310%25 May
mirage7–13-0.0710%25 May
ancient13–6-0.0120%24 May
nuke8–13-0.0328%24 May
mirage13–16-0.1021%24 May
ancient10–13-0.049%24 May
anubis13–7-0.0234%22 May
cache2–13-0.0821%22 May
anubis13–40.0119%22 May
overpass13–11-0.0414%20 May
mirage13–20.0824%20 May
ancient13–4-0.0112%20 May
cache2–13-0.088%19 May
anubis13–16-0.058%16 May
anubis22–20-0.0317%15 May
ancient9–13-0.0612%14 May
mirage6–13-0.0512%14 May
overpass7–13-0.0522%14 May
mirage9–13-0.0424%13 May
ancient19–17-0.0416%13 May
ancient11–13-0.0114%12 May
cache13–11-0.0222%12 May
mirage13–9-0.0733%10 May
mirage13–9-0.0515%10 May
mirage13–16-0.0617%7 May
ancient1–4-0.0160%7 May
nuke13–9-0.0617%7 May
anubis13–5-0.0330%7 May
inferno13–6-0.0428%6 May
ancient13–7-0.047%6 May
anubis13–9-0.0214%5 May
overpass13–11-0.0522%5 May
cache13–9-0.0120%5 May
dust213–10-0.049%5 May
mirage8–13-0.048%5 May
cache11–13-0.0417%5 May
anubis1–13-0.1119%5 May
overpass4–13-0.0611%5 May
anubis8–13-0.0315%29 Apr
anubis9–1-0.026%29 Apr
cache13–40.0441%29 Apr
dust213–10-0.0418%28 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0511%23 Apr
mirage13–9-0.1016%23 Apr
anubis12–16-0.0810%22 Apr
mirage16–12-0.068%21 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0821%19 Apr
dust27–13-0.0231%19 Apr
dust216–14-0.0317%16 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0314%16 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0415%14 Apr
dust28–13-0.0717%14 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0513%13 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0519%13 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0715%13 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0516%13 Apr
dust211–13-0.057%12 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0118%12 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0315%12 Apr
ancient11–13-0.078%11 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0411%11 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0912%11 Apr
overpass10–13-0.075%11 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0213%11 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0114%8 Apr
dust215–15-0.0520%7 Apr
dust213–6-0.0719%4 Apr
dust213–10-0.0014%3 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0511%2 Apr
dust219–17-0.0713%31 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0429%31 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0520%31 Mar
anubis13–70.0223%29 Mar
ancient13–3-0.0117%29 Mar
dust215–15-0.0437%26 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →