Worst Player — CS2 Stats

US76561198050156005[U:1:89890277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,417Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,080Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,359Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6667 of 42234 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	51.1%	46.1%	47.0%	above
Shot accuracy	20.4%	12.6%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.97	1.05	1.07	0.10 short
Match win rate	46.8%	45.7%	46.4%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning65

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWLWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression8.2

Utility4.5

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning6.5

Utility4.5

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time594ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms

Headshot accuracy22.9%−4.7%

first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — cache 13–6

13–0Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 44% over 34

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	34	15–19	44%	-0.01
mirage	A	23	13–10	57%	0.01
cache	S	18	13–5	72%	0.02
inferno	S	7	5–2	71%	0.01
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
ancient	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.03
boulder	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.02
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

231,351Lifetime kills

0.97K/D

7,689Matches

46.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players

51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players

20.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 7 players

21,431MVPs

4,756Hours (in match)

5,075Bombs planted

2,318Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4786,018

AWP42,360

M4A4 / M4A1-S27,245

P2000 / USP-S17,429

Desert Eagle14,139

Glock-188,092

SSG 085,367

P2505,140

Five-SeveN3,383

Tec-92,533

Lifetime map wins

35,921dust2

7,538inferno

4,544nuke

2,452train

2,426cbble

378vertigo

226office

132lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches

61%Win rate

1.48Avg K/D

—ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	1	0%	0.65	15.0
Mirage	1	0%	0.65	11.0
Inferno	1	100%	0.86	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy

37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.9%Spray accuracy

78.2%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

588msReaction time

45.5%T opening success

51.6%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

11.08HE damage / grenade

3.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.6219 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–10	-0.05	22%	28 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	24%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	38%	28 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	32%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	13%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.10	22%	27 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	24%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	22%	27 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.06	23%	27 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	22%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	24%	27 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	22%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	14%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	21%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	23%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	26%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	29%	26 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	14%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	20%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	19%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	23%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	18%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	22%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	29%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	26%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	23%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	50%	21 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	0.02	26%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	10%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.00	31%	20 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.03	20%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	25%	19 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	33%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	18%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	23%	17 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	41%	17 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	10%	14 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	29%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	26%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	20%	13 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.04	17%	12 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	34%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	28%	10 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	32%	6 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	35%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	26%	6 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.04	23%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	25%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–0	-0.04	29%	4 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.05	25%	2 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	24%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	35%	31 Jul →
boulder	13–4	0.05	23%	31 Jul →
cache	13–2	-0.04	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	30%	29 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	20%	28 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	34%	28 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	20%	28 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	27%	21 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.10	38%	17 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	16%	16 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.09	35%	16 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	29%	15 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	26%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	41%	14 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	16%	14 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.06	30%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.04	29%	13 Jul →
boulder	10–13	-0.04	32%	12 Jul →
shelter	13–10	-0.05	43%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	19%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	29%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.05	29%	10 Jul →
boulder	13–7	-0.06	20%	10 Jul →
fachwerk	12–12	0.01	26%	10 Jul →
shelter	8–13	-0.05	29%	9 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	25%	9 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	25%	9 Jul →
cache	7–0	0.07	40%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	38%	8 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	25%	6 Jul →