SnappyEST

SnappyEST — CS2 Stats

EE76561198049587429[U:1:89321701]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,316Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,240Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,415Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35565 of 232986 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 25 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,415 -176 28 Jul19 Sept · 20 days played
23,36525,577peak 25,57728 Jul19 Sept
26,093Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-07-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,162 below peak (25,577)
  • -1,272 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,585 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches18
Win rate50%
K/D1.04
Headshot %43%

Measured 11 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.2%46.8%48.3%9.1% short
Shot accuracy13.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.061.07above
Match win rate51.1%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnappyESTFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,415 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning61
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateLLLWLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time548ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · fachwerk, 14 Sept
42%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · cache, 26 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 26 Aug
13–2Biggest win · boulder, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD1641225%-0.02
infernoB158753%0.00
dust2C146843%0.01
nukeD124833%0.01
anubisD93633%-0.02
ancientS75271%0.00
mirageC73443%0.01
vertigoD51420%-0.02
office31233%0.02
fachwerk220100%0.06
overpass220100%0.02
shelter21150%-0.00
train21150%0.03
boulder21150%0.04
italy21150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

175,121Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,593Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
39.2%Headshot %
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
22,508MVPs
3,634Hours (in match)
8,412Bombs planted
1,814Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4754,313
AWP17,394
FAMAS5,061
P2504,469
SG 5533,074

Lifetime map wins

15,933inferno
9,606dust2
6,928nuke
4,600train
3,252cbble
3,179vertigo
877office
520italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,119Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
89.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2658%1.2416.4
Inferno1650%1.1217.3
Dust21656%1.1918.4
Anubis1567%1.0614.8
Ancient1464%1.1717.3
Nuke933%0.9716.9
Overpass540%1.1517.6
Vertigo333%1.1521.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
550msReaction time
38.7%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
8.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4838 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0213%20 Sept
cache13–160.0112%19 Sept
cache6–130.0221%18 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0213%18 Sept
anubis1–4-0.0933%18 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0318%15 Sept
fachwerk13–50.1316%14 Sept
office13–90.0618%14 Sept
dust213–80.0513%12 Sept
inferno14–160.0217%12 Sept
office6–130.0918%12 Sept
cache7–130.018%11 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.0520%10 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0512%10 Sept
nuke13–50.0417%10 Sept
dust23–13-0.0327%10 Sept
inferno13–70.0730%8 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0327%8 Sept
overpass13–110.0415%6 Sept
shelter13–8-0.0112%6 Sept
train7–130.0124%6 Sept
boulder13–20.1317%6 Sept
cache13–4-0.0440%6 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0227%5 Sept
nuke9–130.0524%5 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0225%5 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0421%5 Sept
mirage13–70.1123%4 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0120%3 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0620%3 Sept
dust215–150.0520%3 Sept
cache13–8-0.0419%3 Sept
nuke12–120.0617%2 Sept
vertigo10–13-0.0718%2 Sept
cache1–13-0.0316%2 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0018%2 Sept
dust213–10-0.0022%1 Sept
inferno13–100.0121%1 Sept
anubis13–60.0714%31 Aug
inferno9–13-0.026%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0018%30 Aug
cache10–13-0.0114%30 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0217%30 Aug
mirage10–13-0.039%29 Aug
dust215–150.0419%29 Aug
cache13–16-0.0314%29 Aug
cache3–13-0.0019%29 Aug
inferno13–40.0818%29 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0331%29 Aug
dust28–13-0.0620%28 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0811%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0224%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0816%28 Aug
cache13–60.0318%28 Aug
italy9–130.0513%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0711%27 Aug
overpass13–50.017%27 Aug
cache12–12-0.0242%26 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0114%26 Aug
dust20–13-0.0313%26 Aug
dust213–7-0.0320%22 Aug
dust210–130.0226%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0928%22 Aug
dust27–60.0625%18 Aug
anubis7–130.0315%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0724%17 Aug
cache13–7-0.0321%17 Aug
train13–110.0515%16 Aug
inferno13–50.0418%14 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.033%13 Aug
nuke8–130.0629%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0627%13 Aug
inferno13–80.0220%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0623%12 Aug
dust213–40.1210%12 Aug
office0–6-0.090%12 Aug
italy13–40.0110%12 Aug
vertigo13–40.0620%10 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0515%9 Aug
ancient16–140.0615%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0123%8 Aug
cache3–13-0.115%8 Aug
shelter7–130.0129%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.0538%5 Aug
dust210–130.0319%4 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0130%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0215%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0314%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.0220%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0217%2 Aug
dust213–100.0320%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0713%29 Jul
ancient13–100.0520%28 Jul
boulder0–13-0.058%28 Jul
inferno13–50.0421%28 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0014%27 Jul
fachwerk13–6-0.0116%27 Jul
anubis12–120.0327%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0416%25 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0413%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →