TompaZ

TompaZ — CS2 Stats

NO76561198047745722[U:1:87479994]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

951Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,138Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,929Blue band · top ~28.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+277Premier CS Rating · 14,652 → 14,929

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,929 -1,609 5 Aug – 13 Oct · 28 days played
12,90016,601peak 16,6015 Aug13 Oct
16,953Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,672 below peak (16,601)
  • +1,012 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 71 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.2%42.7%43.7%5.6% short
Shot accuracy12.6%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.120.991.02above
Match win rate46.9%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTompaZFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,929 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning46
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWWWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.1

Strong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 22% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time550ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 5 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 14 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–10 · inferno, 20 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2711–1641%0.03
infernoA2113–862%0.03
cacheA1912–763%0.02
nukeS118–373%0.02
dust2C94–544%0.03
anubisD82–625%0.02
ancientC52–340%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,293Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
4,071Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
38.2%Headshot %
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
8,857MVPs
1,939Hours (in match)
3,561Bombs planted
1,606Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,737
AWP6,097
P903,027
Tec-92,461
MP71,910
SSG 081,333

Lifetime map wins

9,290inferno
7,415nuke
6,308dust2
636train
629vertigo
148militia
146cbble
106dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
550msReaction time
64.2%T opening success
22.1%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
10.90HE damage / grenade
11.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 22.0629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–7-0.0418%13 Oct →
cache13–50.0514%5 Oct →
mirage13–40.1921%5 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0613%5 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0411%2 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0220%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0821%2 Oct →
mirage3–130.0316%2 Oct →
mirage12–160.0218%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0510%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.0715%29 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.1112%29 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0313%29 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0116%28 Sept →
cache13–50.1412%28 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0120%26 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0111%25 Sept →
anubis13–70.0919%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0920%25 Sept →
mirage13–60.1021%25 Sept →
anubis15–150.0417%25 Sept →
inferno5–130.0112%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.019%17 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0513%17 Sept →
mirage11–130.0616%16 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0226%15 Sept →
mirage13–40.0710%15 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0122%15 Sept →
mirage16–120.0425%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0526%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.1024%7 Sept →
inferno7–130.0416%7 Sept →
nuke10–130.0118%7 Sept →
inferno9–40.049%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0017%6 Sept →
nuke13–60.0422%6 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0017%2 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0024%2 Sept →
inferno11–130.0827%2 Sept →
mirage10–130.0130%2 Sept →
cache3–130.0133%2 Sept →
mirage5–130.0219%2 Sept →
dust213–40.0817%1 Sept →
inferno13–80.0713%1 Sept →
ancient12–160.0414%1 Sept →
dust213–110.1710%1 Sept →
anubis9–130.0323%30 Aug →
cache7–130.0720%30 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.048%30 Aug →
ancient14–160.0310%30 Aug →
dust213–100.1020%30 Aug →
cache13–70.0120%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0119%30 Aug →
dust28–130.0322%27 Aug →
mirage10–130.0719%27 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.014%27 Aug →
cache9–9-0.0411%27 Aug →
inferno11–130.0212%27 Aug →
inferno13–60.0422%26 Aug →
cache13–40.1112%26 Aug →
nuke11–130.0016%24 Aug →
inferno9–20.1920%24 Aug →
ancient13–110.0420%20 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0012%20 Aug →
inferno3–10-0.0321%20 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0024%20 Aug →
cache15–150.0427%19 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0923%19 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0529%19 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0410%18 Aug →
cache10–130.0417%18 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0229%18 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0011%17 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0114%17 Aug →
mirage13–100.0218%17 Aug →
mirage13–20.1015%17 Aug →
cache13–90.0921%17 Aug →
inferno6–130.0411%17 Aug →
mirage7–130.0013%16 Aug →
dust213–20.0218%16 Aug →
inferno13–90.0113%16 Aug →
mirage6–130.1216%16 Aug →
ancient13–70.0215%14 Aug →
mirage13–90.1834%14 Aug →
cache16–120.0221%14 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0616%14 Aug →
anubis9–130.0218%13 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0217%13 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0613%13 Aug →
mirage13–160.0810%13 Aug →
nuke13–60.0216%11 Aug →
anubis6–130.049%11 Aug →
inferno13–50.0613%11 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0215%11 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0216%11 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0520%6 Aug →
mirage13–20.1032%6 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.039%6 Aug →
inferno13–40.0528%6 Aug →
inferno13–70.0622%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.