oSee

oSee — CS2 Stats

PROJNRGUnited StatesAWPerSettings & gear profile →

US76561198047472534[U:1:87206806]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,724Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 4,065 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoSeeFACEITLevel 10 · 4,065 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning75
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateWWWWLTLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.11 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5
Aggression10.0
Utility6.3
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 72% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 72% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning7.5
Utility6.3
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time471ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 480ms → last ⅓ avg 471ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — inferno 11–13
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 78% over 27dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2721678%0.02
ancientA169756%0.01
dust2D1441029%-0.01
infernoC146843%0.04
nukeD1441029%-0.00
anubisD72529%0.02
overpassA53260%0.01
cache220100%0.03
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,688Matches
61%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
95.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41163%1.4620.2
Dust220671%1.6220.0
Ancient19666%1.5118.9
Anubis16661%1.5318.8
Inferno8975%1.5417.1
Overpass7572%1.5619.8
Vertigo4571%1.4318.6
Nuke4351%1.4518.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$19,551Inventory value751ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Doppler (Factory New)$1,828★ Sport Gloves | Pandora's Box (Field-Tested)$1,823M4A1-S | Hot Rod (Factory New)$1,814AK-47 | X-Ray (Factory New)$1,808★ Specialist Gloves | Crimson Kimono (Field-Tested)$1,703★ Moto Gloves | Spearmint (Field-Tested)$1,684

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
461msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
71.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
7.03HE damage / grenade
13.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8424% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.0229%15 Jul
dust213–5-0.0010%15 Jul
mirage11–10.0621%15 Jul
cache13–90.0422%15 Jul
mirage10–130.1324%10 Jul
inferno12–120.1924%10 Jul
inferno11–130.2822%9 Jul
nuke16–120.0429%5 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0314%5 Jun
dust25–120.0032%5 Jun
dust20–1-0.120%5 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0515%4 Jun
mirage13–10-0.048%3 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0317%2 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0233%2 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0133%21 May
nuke10–13-0.0518%20 May
ancient3–13-0.0335%12 May
nuke11–130.0112%12 May
ancient13–16-0.044%11 May
inferno11–13-0.0014%26 Apr
mirage13–90.0118%26 Apr
overpass4–13-0.118%26 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0214%25 Apr
ancient13–30.0215%25 Apr
nuke13–10.0929%25 Apr
mirage13–00.0821%25 Apr
dust26–13-0.0131%7 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0116%7 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0129%6 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0226%6 Apr
nuke2–130.0133%5 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0936%5 Apr
mirage13–40.008%4 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0212%4 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0027%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0130%22 Mar
dust27–130.0540%22 Mar
nuke2–13-0.088%22 Mar
mirage13–70.0623%21 Mar
anubis14–160.0119%20 Mar
inferno13–60.0515%20 Mar
ancient13–90.1020%20 Mar
nuke8–130.0641%18 Mar
dust28–13-0.0621%18 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0717%18 Mar
anubis11–130.0620%8 Mar
ancient13–70.039%3 Mar
anubis16–190.0316%3 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0116%3 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0222%2 Mar
nuke7–11-0.0525%2 Mar
anubis10–130.0118%2 Mar
nuke2–2-0.0117%2 Mar
inferno8–130.0038%1 Mar
nuke10–130.017%1 Mar
ancient13–40.0415%27 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0612%19 Feb
overpass13–80.1727%17 Feb
nuke13–30.0335%8 Feb
mirage13–70.0619%8 Feb
mirage13–60.1042%8 Feb
dust28–13-0.0127%8 Feb
ancient11–130.0132%8 Feb
dust211–130.0232%7 Feb
ancient13–100.0416%7 Feb
mirage19–15-0.0011%7 Feb
mirage13–80.0018%6 Feb
ancient13–30.0820%6 Feb
ancient13–110.0926%2 Feb
dust29–13-0.0134%2 Feb
inferno5–130.0430%2 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0222%1 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0026%1 Feb
anubis13–100.0114%31 Jan
mirage13–110.0023%31 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0329%30 Jan
mirage16–140.0816%30 Jan
inferno13–70.0221%30 Jan
anubis13–60.0119%29 Jan
mirage13–20.1343%28 Jan
inferno13–110.0728%28 Jan
dust24–130.0623%28 Jan
mirage13–30.0720%27 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0318%27 Jan
dust213–5-0.0124%24 Jan
ancient13–90.0619%19 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0221%16 Jan
dust213–7-0.0228%15 Jan
overpass13–50.0118%14 Jan
dust21–13-0.1118%12 Jan
mirage10–8-0.0219%12 Jan
overpass13–90.049%11 Jan
inferno5–130.0229%11 Jan
mirage19–170.0022%11 Jan
mirage13–40.0922%10 Jan
dust216–140.0736%10 Jan
inferno13–90.0016%10 Jan
train13–30.0216%10 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0218%10 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →