teteu balas fofas

teteu balas fofas — CS2 Stats

BR76561198046923238[U:1:86657510]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

369Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,871Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#72491 of 222564 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 7 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,004 +5 21 Jun28 Jun · 3 days played
19,70020,004peak 20,00421 Jun28 Jun
20,123Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-06-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.4%45.8%46.8%1.4% short
Shot accuracy16.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.921.051.060.15 short
Match win rate48.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGteteu balas fofasFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning40
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT4852Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time556ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 24 Jul
38%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · mirage, 24 Jun
398msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 22 Aug
21–0Biggest win · nuke, 5 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%-0.01
infernoD1951426%-0.02
ancientS1812667%-0.02
dust2A1710759%-0.03
anubisA116555%-0.02
nukeB84450%-0.01
overpass31233%0.00
cache1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

118,984Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
4,232Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
45.4%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
11,724MVPs
2,740Hours (in match)
4,474Bombs planted
1,609Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,779
AWP10,773
Knife1,815
MP91,508
FAMAS1,409

Lifetime map wins

16,708inferno
8,726dust2
5,997vertigo
2,396train
1,067nuke
295cbble
64lake
54aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

296Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
68.8ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3100%1.1113.7
Anubis333%0.426.3
Mirage367%0.7312.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
555msReaction time
15.0%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
15.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.9771% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–13-0.0813%16 Sept
dust213–80.0015%16 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0824%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0238%28 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0514%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0326%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0115%27 Aug
dust213–10-0.0423%27 Aug
dust213–9-0.0415%26 Aug
anubis13–20.0517%26 Aug
dust213–4-0.017%26 Aug
dust219–22-0.0218%25 Aug
dust213–16-0.0416%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.0312%24 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0424%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0021%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.077%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0521%22 Aug
dust216–14-0.0320%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0915%21 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0218%21 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0510%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0219%20 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0414%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.076%20 Aug
dust213–8-0.0412%18 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0512%17 Aug
ancient8–130.0625%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0210%16 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0719%12 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0222%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0316%8 Aug
dust213–00.0519%6 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0121%6 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0114%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0316%6 Aug
nuke21–0-0.0132%5 Aug
mirage16–120.0616%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0218%5 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0417%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0617%5 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0337%4 Aug
mirage13–16-0.007%29 Jul
ancient13–90.0430%29 Jul
anubis14–160.0013%25 Jul
mirage13–70.1214%24 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0319%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0515%24 Jul
ancient13–11-0.069%10 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0414%9 Jul
mirage13–90.1021%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0417%4 Jul
anubis13–40.0314%4 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0219%28 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0911%28 Jun
inferno13–40.0821%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0016%28 Jun
mirage10–130.0417%27 Jun
mirage18–22-0.0611%26 Jun
anubis13–11-0.1113%26 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0417%26 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0438%24 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0324%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.049%23 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0217%23 Jun
dust213–10-0.0415%23 Jun
nuke13–110.019%21 Jun
ancient3–70.0617%21 Jun
inferno10–130.0020%20 Jun
ancient9–5-0.0410%20 Jun
overpass9–130.0312%20 Jun
dust210–13-0.0817%19 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0414%19 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0325%18 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0515%18 Jun
nuke13–110.0125%18 Jun
inferno5–13-0.066%17 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0012%16 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0625%15 Jun
mirage13–60.0025%14 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0430%14 Jun
dust213–80.0923%13 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0118%13 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0516%12 Jun
cache7–13-0.0722%12 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0221%12 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0319%11 Jun
anubis15–190.0125%11 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0311%10 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0114%10 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0315%10 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0111%9 Jun
inferno5–130.0220%9 Jun
inferno13–50.0115%9 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0227%9 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0012%8 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0323%8 Jun
ancient9–130.0414%8 Jun
overpass13–90.0217%7 Jun
nuke13–70.0512%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →