Coca-Coda — CS2 Stats

US76561198045729174[U:1:85463446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

554Tracked matches68%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+40Tracked matches · now 554

+14.2ppWin rate · 53.8% → 68.0%

Rating over time

41Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim33

Positioning42

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–39–10Last 10051%Win rateTWWWWWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–0–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 675ms

Last 10

7–1–2 · 70% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

12–6–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim3.3

Utility4.9

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3

Positioning4.2

Utility4.9

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05

Reaction time631ms−102ms

first ⅓ avg 733ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms

Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 19 Jul →

38%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · office, 31 Aug →

453msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 2 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · office, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

4–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	B	36	19–17	53%	-0.03
cache	S	19	13–6	68%	-0.02
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.05
dust2	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.04
vertigo	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.06
mirage	S	6	6–0	100%	-0.07
nuke	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.04
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
rush_001	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.22
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches

33%Win rate

0.80Avg K/D

69.4ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	50%	0.72	10.0
Cache	2	0%	0.80	11.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.80	12.0
Inferno	1	100%	1.00	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy

26.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

28.2%Spray accuracy

68.4%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

633msReaction time

32.3%T opening success

32.1%CT opening success

0.36Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

12.98HE damage / grenade

5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3557 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.3481% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	12–12	-0.05	20%	8 Oct →
office	13–7	0.07	21%	8 Oct →
office	13–9	-0.06	7%	7 Oct →
office	13–6	0.05	18%	7 Oct →
office	13–6	-0.05	14%	7 Oct →
cache	13–6	-0.02	9%	7 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.07	18%	4 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.04	20%	4 Oct →
office	6–13	-0.07	13%	4 Oct →
office	13–9	0.00	20%	2 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	13%	2 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	15%	30 Sept →
vertigo	5–13	-0.11	21%	30 Sept →
vertigo	13–5	-0.10	12%	30 Sept →
office	8–13	-0.11	18%	30 Sept →
rush_001	0–4	-0.22	0%	29 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.06	20%	29 Sept →
office	13–0	-0.06	5%	25 Sept →
office	13–6	-0.00	14%	25 Sept →
inferno	9–3	-0.18	9%	23 Sept →
train	9–13	-0.02	15%	23 Sept →
office	13–4	-0.05	18%	17 Sept →
office	13–3	0.02	29%	17 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.01	17%	16 Sept →
vertigo	13–8	-0.12	7%	14 Sept →
cache	13–4	-0.07	24%	12 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.06	19%	12 Sept →
office	13–8	0.02	20%	11 Sept →
office	8–13	-0.02	24%	10 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.03	18%	9 Sept →
office	13–7	0.03	27%	8 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.10	16%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	16%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	14%	8 Sept →
cache	13–9	-0.01	20%	8 Sept →
vertigo	5–13	0.04	24%	7 Sept →
office	6–13	-0.08	0%	7 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.05	8%	7 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	13%	7 Sept →
office	9–13	-0.08	15%	7 Sept →
cache	13–4	0.04	23%	3 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.12	6%	3 Sept →
office	12–12	-0.07	38%	31 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.04	13%	31 Aug →
office	11–13	-0.01	19%	28 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.00	11%	27 Aug →
office	3–13	-0.03	19%	27 Aug →
office	13–11	0.00	22%	27 Aug →
office	12–12	0.00	22%	27 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.10	13%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.08	7%	23 Aug →
office	13–7	-0.00	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	10%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	24%	23 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.08	9%	21 Aug →
office	12–12	-0.07	11%	21 Aug →
office	13–11	-0.03	18%	12 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.05	21%	12 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	16%	12 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.05	31%	7 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	13%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.08	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	35%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	18%	31 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	19%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.07	13%	30 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	17%	30 Jul →
office	13–4	-0.00	22%	30 Jul →
office	4–13	-0.03	16%	29 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	3%	28 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.11	8%	28 Jul →
office	13–5	-0.04	29%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	19%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	25%	27 Jul →
cache	9–2	0.03	31%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.07	20%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.07	21%	24 Jul →
office	13–5	0.01	13%	24 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.08	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	9%	24 Jul →
office	13–10	-0.06	27%	22 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.04	32%	22 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	18%	21 Jul →
inferno	2–13	0.00	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	9%	20 Jul →
office	13–4	0.01	12%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	13%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	11%	20 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	12%	20 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.07	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.00	23%	20 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	23%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.08	19%	19 Jul →
office	10–13	-0.08	27%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.10	15%	19 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	7%	19 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.06	15%	18 Jul →