Joppe-T

Joppe-T — CS2 Stats

76561198045185666[U:1:84919938]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,423Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,947Top 10% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13069 of 251243 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,740 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,947 +516 3 Sept – 8 Oct · 30 days played
24,89626,445peak 26,4453 Sept8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,740 +0 10 Sept – 20 Sept · 5 observations
1,7401,740peak 1,74010 Sept20 Sept
26,555Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,740Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,740
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 11 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 498 below peak (26,445)
  • +882 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,053 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoppe-TFACEITLevel 7 · 1,740 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER25,947 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,740csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning55
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility7.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.5
Utility7.6
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time568ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 25 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · dust2, 4 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 88% over 17dust2Weakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2210–1245%-0.02
nukeS1715–288%0.00
cacheS1410–471%0.01
mirageD134–931%-0.02
ancientA116–555%-0.01
dust2D101–910%-0.03
anubisC83–538%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.01
debris—10–10%0.04
shelter—10–10%0.00
poseidon—10–10%-0.09
boulder—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

876Matches
54%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
69.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8664%0.9513.0
Nuke5969%0.9112.1
Ancient3644%0.8713.1
Anubis3447%0.8911.7
Overpass2560%1.0913.1
Dust21856%0.9515.3
Train1644%0.8713.7
Mirage617%0.437.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
64.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
571msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
8.69HE damage / grenade
20.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6332% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke1–13-0.0429%11 Oct →
cache13–100.0321%11 Oct →
overpass13–100.0111%9 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0520%9 Oct →
inferno13–70.0216%9 Oct →
mirage13–10.0722%8 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0018%8 Oct →
debris7–90.0419%8 Oct →
cache13–40.0316%7 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0315%7 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0310%7 Oct →
dust213–70.0820%6 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0512%6 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1015%5 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0310%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0215%5 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0320%5 Oct →
mirage4–5-0.0614%4 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0545%4 Oct →
dust28–130.028%4 Oct →
nuke13–40.0727%4 Oct →
nuke13–100.0223%3 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0016%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0318%3 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0619%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0315%2 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0313%2 Oct →
anubis13–60.1110%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0414%2 Oct →
nuke13–30.0218%2 Oct →
inferno2–5-0.070%1 Oct →
inferno3–6-0.0530%1 Oct →
cache13–30.1018%1 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0829%1 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0117%1 Oct →
inferno8–130.0118%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0412%1 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0312%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0115%30 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0213%30 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0014%29 Sept →
mirage16–130.0016%29 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.053%29 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0218%28 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0214%28 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0422%27 Sept →
cache13–80.067%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0818%27 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0313%26 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0519%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0314%26 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0114%26 Sept →
nuke13–100.0211%25 Sept →
anubis8–130.0110%25 Sept →
cache13–60.1513%25 Sept →
ancient13–80.018%25 Sept →
mirage11–130.0019%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.0311%25 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0312%24 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.057%24 Sept →
nuke13–80.0311%24 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0622%23 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.028%23 Sept →
cache13–4-0.037%23 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0419%22 Sept →
shelter5–130.0013%22 Sept →
ancient13–80.0124%22 Sept →
cache13–110.0211%21 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0117%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0127%21 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0228%18 Sept →
poseidon4–9-0.0927%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.088%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.029%12 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0218%12 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0426%12 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0121%12 Sept →
ancient13–40.076%9 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0315%9 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.112%9 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0728%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0217%8 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0818%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0323%8 Sept →
nuke16–120.0318%7 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0417%7 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0917%7 Sept →
cache6–130.0125%6 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0219%6 Sept →
nuke13–80.1023%6 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.008%6 Sept →
inferno11–130.0114%6 Sept →
inferno13–100.0313%4 Sept →
anubis13–90.0416%4 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0214%4 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0510%4 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0210%4 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0216%3 Sept →
boulder8–13-0.0310%3 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.018%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.