mummeli

mummeli — CS2 Stats

FI76561198044000290[U:1:83734562]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,485Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,541Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,344 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,541 -323 3 Jul – 31 Oct · 33 days played
18,54121,473peak 21,4733 Jul31 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,344 +0 5 Sept – 17 Sept · 2 observations
1,3441,344peak 1,3445 Sept17 Sept
21,879Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,344Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,344
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,932 below peak (21,473)
  • -786 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,342 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,459 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmummeliFACEITLevel 7 · 1,344 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,541 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,344csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning56
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.6
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 22 Jul →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · anubis, 11 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–7 · mirage, 18 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 14 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 23dust2Weakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315–865%0.01
nukeA2213–959%0.01
cacheC156–940%0.01
dust2D112–918%-0.02
ancientC104–640%-0.01
anubisC83–538%0.01
infernoD82–625%0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

354Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
73.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8551%1.0914.7
Ancient4464%0.9415.2
Nuke4060%1.1815.6
Anubis2635%1.0715.3
Dust22540%1.0515.4
Inferno1656%1.2415.2
Vertigo1145%1.0515.2
Cache250%1.4714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
561msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.09HE damage / grenade
13.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0418%31 Oct →
anubis13–70.0412%31 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0215%31 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0215%23 Oct →
anubis13–110.0110%23 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0219%23 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0420%22 Oct →
cache11–130.1135%22 Oct →
dust213–110.0415%17 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0136%17 Oct →
nuke13–100.0319%17 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0320%12 Oct →
anubis10–130.0512%12 Oct →
anubis10–130.0213%11 Oct →
anubis13–70.0045%11 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0713%10 Oct →
inferno13–110.0422%10 Oct →
mirage13–110.0023%10 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0212%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0735%25 Sept →
inferno5–130.0036%25 Sept →
cache3–130.0623%6 Sept →
nuke2–130.0537%6 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0216%26 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0138%19 Aug →
mirage3–70.0014%18 Aug →
nuke13–90.0432%18 Aug →
cache15–150.0423%18 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0417%6 Aug →
inferno11–130.0724%4 Aug →
mirage13–110.0333%2 Aug →
dust26–130.0515%1 Aug →
ancient10–130.0125%1 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0017%30 Jul →
nuke16–130.0219%30 Jul →
nuke13–30.0523%30 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0518%28 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0228%28 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0328%26 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0722%26 Jul →
cache13–20.0532%25 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0222%24 Jul →
cache13–110.0425%23 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0627%23 Jul →
mirage11–130.0110%22 Jul →
nuke9–130.0114%22 Jul →
mirage13–30.1627%22 Jul →
mirage13–50.0517%22 Jul →
nuke13–100.0227%21 Jul →
dust213–160.009%20 Jul →
ancient13–60.0914%20 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0114%20 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0713%20 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0123%19 Jul →
cache13–60.0114%19 Jul →
nuke12–160.0217%16 Jul →
mirage13–80.0034%16 Jul →
ancient10–130.0118%16 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0311%15 Jul →
dust21–6-0.0511%15 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0629%15 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0323%15 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0325%15 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0413%14 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0022%14 Jul →
mirage13–00.1030%14 Jul →
ancient11–130.0117%14 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0117%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0513%13 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0127%13 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0611%13 Jul →
mirage13–60.046%13 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0010%13 Jul →
nuke13–100.0824%13 Jul →
cache10–130.0220%12 Jul →
inferno9–130.0028%12 Jul →
inferno13–60.0117%12 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0224%12 Jul →
ancient13–50.0316%12 Jul →
mirage16–140.0229%12 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0239%11 Jul →
mirage13–20.025%9 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0015%9 Jul →
nuke8–130.0232%9 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0225%9 Jul →
dust213–80.0220%8 Jul →
mirage13–10.0730%7 Jul →
nuke13–40.0230%7 Jul →
nuke13–60.1014%7 Jul →
cache10–130.0535%7 Jul →
inferno11–130.0117%6 Jul →
overpass13–30.0224%6 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0222%5 Jul →
mirage13–110.0015%5 Jul →
overpass13–70.0418%5 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0314%4 Jul →
overpass13–70.0415%4 Jul →
mirage13–100.0318%4 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0115%4 Jul →
nuke7–130.0424%3 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.