Cache enjoyer

Cache enjoyer — CS2 Stats

76561198043476966[U:1:83211238]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,141Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,404Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,128 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,128 → 2,128
+9Tracked matches · now 1,141
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 3 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,516 -1,012 5 May6 Jul · 13 days played
22,51624,816peak 24,8165 May6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,128 +0 2 Sept10 Sept · 2 observations
2,1282,128peak 2,1282 Sept10 Sept
24,816Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,128Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-05-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,128
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 372 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=25,925), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate43.1%51.0%
Shot accuracy12.7%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.951.09
Match win rate40.8%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCache enjoyerFACEITLevel 10 · 2,128 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,128csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning45
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57394Last 10057%Win rateLWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −142ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 431ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.5
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time539ms+55ms
first ⅓ avg 484ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 24 Jun
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · train, 19 Jun
297msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 10 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 76% over 25anubisWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2519676%0.03
anubisC1771041%0.02
dust2C1771041%0.01
mirageA148657%-0.01
infernoA117464%0.04
ancientA74357%0.01
train43175%0.04
office220100%0.02
debris1010%-0.22
overpass1010%-0.01
nuke1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

132,656Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
5,553Matches
40.8%Match win rate
43.1%Headshot %
12.7%Shot accuracy
8,570MVPs
4,404Hours (in match)
4,394Bombs planted
1,083Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,352
AWP22,911
P2503,623
Tec-92,247
SSG 081,856
FAMAS1,713

Lifetime map wins

6,452inferno
5,296dust2
2,847nuke
2,165train
1,770cbble
462office
256vertigo
158lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

695Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
75.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12150%1.0313.9
Anubis9257%1.1015.0
Dust29148%1.0014.3
Inferno7156%1.2916.4
Ancient6749%1.0013.9
Cache2075%1.2016.3
Nuke2065%1.0714.8
Overpass1540%0.9915.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
504msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
6.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2002% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0526%16 Sept
anubis13–110.0113%16 Sept
anubis13–50.0518%10 Sept
dust213–110.0718%6 Sept
ancient13–60.0830%5 Sept
cache16–14-0.0013%25 Aug
anubis13–80.0114%25 Aug
debris2–9-0.2217%24 Aug
mirage13–00.000%24 Aug
dust216–120.0421%15 Aug
mirage0–3-0.100%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0512%15 Aug
cache13–60.065%14 Aug
train0–13-0.0540%12 Aug
train13–20.1037%12 Aug
inferno13–100.036%9 Aug
anubis2–13-0.080%9 Aug
dust24–13-0.0613%6 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0728%4 Aug
mirage13–50.1117%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0412%1 Aug
inferno13–70.1315%26 Jul
cache13–50.0312%26 Jul
inferno0–7-0.010%26 Jul
cache13–110.0414%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0317%25 Jul
cache6–130.0117%22 Jul
anubis13–40.1518%22 Jul
anubis12–120.0117%22 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0120%16 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0226%16 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0740%14 Jul
dust213–1-0.0221%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0822%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0024%13 Jul
dust213–90.1131%13 Jul
office13–20.0444%13 Jul
office8–20.0023%13 Jul
dust27–130.0926%6 Jul
anubis0–6-0.0210%6 Jul
dust211–130.0320%6 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0010%2 Jul
cache13–80.0415%1 Jul
cache8–130.0216%1 Jul
dust26–13-0.0222%1 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0111%30 Jun
ancient13–110.0017%30 Jun
dust21–13-0.0614%28 Jun
cache7–130.0038%28 Jun
inferno6–130.0412%25 Jun
cache13–50.0417%24 Jun
anubis13–40.1621%24 Jun
train13–30.079%23 Jun
mirage13–70.0223%20 Jun
dust29–130.0219%20 Jun
dust213–40.0112%19 Jun
cache7–3-0.0415%19 Jun
train13–30.0653%19 Jun
cache13–00.0318%18 Jun
cache13–11-0.0123%17 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0620%15 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0450%15 Jun
anubis13–30.0615%13 Jun
cache13–30.0821%13 Jun
cache7–130.0820%13 Jun
cache13–90.1327%12 Jun
dust23–13-0.0938%12 Jun
inferno13–30.1330%12 Jun
inferno13–40.0022%4 Jun
dust213–60.1315%4 Jun
dust24–13-0.0810%3 Jun
dust23–13-0.1225%2 Jun
anubis11–130.0323%1 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0112%31 May
mirage13–70.0014%27 May
inferno13–30.0926%27 May
inferno15–150.0121%27 May
anubis5–13-0.0432%27 May
ancient13–50.1114%27 May
inferno13–90.0521%25 May
mirage10–130.0214%25 May
cache13–20.0830%25 May
inferno9–10.037%25 May
dust212–120.0324%25 May
ancient13–2-0.0211%21 May
cache8–13-0.0318%21 May
cache13–50.0213%19 May
overpass10–13-0.0118%18 May
ancient10–13-0.0118%17 May
cache13–10-0.0210%16 May
cache12–12-0.0014%13 May
cache13–30.0913%12 May
cache13–40.1032%11 May
nuke11–13-0.0212%10 May
cache13–4-0.0621%6 May
dust213–30.1419%5 May
anubis7–130.039%4 May
mirage4–13-0.0518%4 May
cache13–80.0911%4 May
cache13–110.0216%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →