Nitro Nick

Nitro Nick — CS2 Stats

PT76561198042619204[U:1:82353476]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

804Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 804
+1.8ppWin rate · 53.3% → 55.2%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,511 -227 25 Apr – 12 Jan · 25 days played
7,15110,738peak 10,73825 Apr12 Jan
10,738Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2024-04-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNitro NickFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning34
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWTWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility2.5
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 680ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning3.4
Utility2.5
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time681ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 692ms → last ⅓ avg 681ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 5 Jan →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · office, 19 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 28 Apr →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 13 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2915–1452%-0.01
mirageB136–746%0.03
ancientA116–555%-0.01
dust2D93–633%-0.00
infernoA95–456%0.01
anubisB84–450%0.04
vertigoS64–267%0.01
officeC52–340%-0.04
cache—32–167%0.01
overpass—20–20%-0.02
basalt—20–20%0.02
train—10–10%-0.01
edin—10–10%-0.07
thera—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
29.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
680msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
17.43HE damage / grenade
0.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 0.9412 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.0525% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–100.0820%24 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0118%24 Sept →
cache13–90.0231%17 Sept →
cache13–90.0630%6 May →
cache6–13-0.0419%6 May →
office13–10-0.0311%25 Nov →
nuke13–30.0221%25 Nov →
dust213–7-0.0121%19 Nov →
overpass8–13-0.0617%15 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0815%15 Nov →
ancient13–80.0416%13 Nov →
ancient13–80.0714%13 Nov →
nuke13–10-0.049%25 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0234%23 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0130%23 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0716%27 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0815%27 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0226%15 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0124%8 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.078%26 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0413%26 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0422%26 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.049%19 Aug →
overpass5–130.0118%14 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0323%13 Aug →
nuke13–20.0317%13 Mar →
dust210–130.0121%13 Mar →
nuke5–130.0318%13 Mar →
nuke13–110.0113%19 Feb →
office13–4-0.0736%19 Feb →
train5–13-0.0115%2 Feb →
mirage16–130.0116%12 Jan →
nuke13–9-0.0216%12 Jan →
nuke10–130.0521%8 Jan →
mirage12–16-0.0413%6 Jan →
nuke3–13-0.0330%5 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.0318%5 Jan →
inferno13–60.1315%5 Jan →
vertigo13–50.0016%5 Jan →
nuke6–20.046%5 Jan →
nuke11–130.0516%4 Jan →
office5–13-0.067%3 Jan →
nuke13–2-0.0431%3 Jan →
mirage11–130.0116%3 Jan →
mirage13–11-0.0117%31 Dec →
inferno15–15-0.0223%30 Dec →
dust210–13-0.0311%25 Dec →
vertigo13–80.0118%25 Dec →
dust213–90.0719%25 Dec →
dust213–40.059%25 Dec →
inferno16–14-0.0223%25 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.0615%24 Dec →
mirage13–100.0617%24 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.018%24 Dec →
anubis13–80.0618%23 Dec →
dust214–16-0.0216%23 Dec →
dust29–13-0.0913%23 Dec →
nuke12–12-0.0021%23 Dec →
nuke13–7-0.0113%23 Dec →
anubis11–13-0.0611%23 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0415%23 Dec →
anubis14–160.0210%20 Dec →
mirage5–13-0.0517%20 Dec →
mirage16–130.0226%18 Dec →
vertigo13–7-0.0322%18 Dec →
mirage13–20.1221%13 Dec →
nuke1–11-0.0533%13 Dec →
mirage10–130.0831%11 Dec →
ancient13–90.0013%11 Dec →
anubis2–10.0933%11 Dec →
nuke4–130.0019%8 Dec →
basalt5–13-0.0418%8 Dec →
inferno8–130.0512%8 Dec →
ancient13–11-0.0212%8 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.1111%3 Dec →
dust26–130.0422%2 Dec →
ancient13–90.0217%2 Dec →
ancient10–13-0.0014%1 Dec →
mirage8–130.0321%1 Dec →
anubis13–90.0813%1 Dec →
anubis13–40.0821%1 Dec →
mirage13–50.0216%30 Nov →
mirage4–100.0622%29 Nov →
nuke13–90.0826%29 Nov →
edin7–13-0.0715%22 Nov →
mirage9–130.0819%22 Nov →
anubis11–130.1015%20 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0119%19 Nov →
basalt10–130.0815%19 Nov →
nuke5–13-0.0416%7 Nov →
office12–12-0.036%7 Nov →
nuke13–70.0410%7 Nov →
office12–12-0.0224%7 Nov →
nuke13–20.1018%20 Oct →
thera7–13-0.0631%8 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0210%28 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0616%28 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0312%26 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0413%26 Apr →
vertigo7–13-0.038%25 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.