Kachow

Kachow — CS2 Stats

NL76561198041602981[U:1:81337253]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,465Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,694Top 5% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3878 of 261689 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−526Premier CS Rating · 28,220 → 27,694

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,694 +1,246 24 Sept – 15 Nov · 31 days played
26,44829,006peak 29,00624 Sept15 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,556 +0 24 Sept – 20 Oct · 3 observations
2,5562,556peak 2,55624 Sept20 Oct
29,336Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,556Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,312 below peak (29,006)
  • +466 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,306 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKachowFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,694 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,556csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning69
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLLWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −103ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.1
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time568ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 14 Nov →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 22 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · cache, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 12 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB209–1145%0.01
infernoB1910–953%0.01
cacheS1711–665%0.02
ancientA148–657%0.01
dust2S128–467%0.00
anubisB105–550%0.01
nukeB84–450%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

949Matches
54%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
79.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10961%1.1616.3
Dust27349%1.1616.0
Inferno5749%1.1515.7
Ancient5250%1.1916.1
Anubis4032%1.0215.4
Cache2669%1.5018.6
Nuke1856%1.3418.1
Vertigo862%1.1917.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
558msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
62.0%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.98HE damage / grenade
8.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4309% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0518%15 Nov →
mirage3–100.0447%15 Nov →
ancient13–70.0320%14 Nov →
dust213–70.0224%14 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0526%14 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0423%14 Nov →
mirage13–70.0623%14 Nov →
inferno8–130.0026%14 Nov →
cache13–60.0926%14 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0018%13 Nov →
mirage13–70.0112%13 Nov →
dust216–14-0.0227%13 Nov →
mirage10–130.0524%13 Nov →
ancient13–100.0417%13 Nov →
cache14–16-0.0025%13 Nov →
anubis13–40.0125%12 Nov →
dust213–10.039%12 Nov →
mirage13–160.0241%12 Nov →
anubis4–130.0021%12 Nov →
mirage12–16-0.0724%12 Nov →
inferno10–130.0128%11 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0226%10 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0619%10 Nov →
anubis9–40.0330%10 Nov →
cache13–100.0023%10 Nov →
inferno13–6-0.0114%9 Nov →
mirage13–40.0217%8 Nov →
nuke13–5-0.0421%8 Nov →
inferno13–70.0226%7 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0721%5 Nov →
inferno6–130.0438%5 Nov →
dust213–90.0324%4 Nov →
mirage3–130.0321%28 Oct →
mirage13–40.0617%28 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0222%28 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0320%27 Oct →
mirage13–50.0331%27 Oct →
cache13–70.0225%24 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0323%23 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0332%23 Oct →
nuke16–130.0322%22 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0535%22 Oct →
anubis15–150.0126%22 Oct →
ancient13–80.0523%22 Oct →
inferno8–130.0653%22 Oct →
dust216–19-0.0621%21 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0015%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.0325%18 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0323%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0128%18 Oct →
anubis13–100.0415%17 Oct →
nuke15–150.0031%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0322%16 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0738%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0818%15 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0437%15 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0024%15 Oct →
ancient13–80.0721%15 Oct →
cache13–80.0920%14 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0235%14 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0232%14 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0823%14 Oct →
dust29–130.0133%14 Oct →
mirage13–80.0626%14 Oct →
cache11–130.0323%13 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0121%13 Oct →
cache11–130.0235%13 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0529%13 Oct →
nuke5–130.007%13 Oct →
inferno13–70.0410%13 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0247%12 Oct →
dust213–110.0317%12 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0230%12 Oct →
inferno13–100.0123%11 Oct →
mirage19–170.0027%8 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0217%8 Oct →
inferno13–40.0724%8 Oct →
dust213–70.0823%7 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0120%7 Oct →
ancient14–160.0027%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0524%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0932%3 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0335%1 Oct →
inferno7–130.0125%1 Oct →
ancient7–130.0018%1 Oct →
nuke13–90.0221%30 Sept →
cache13–20.0724%30 Sept →
mirage9–130.0118%29 Sept →
inferno0–2-0.060%27 Sept →
inferno13–90.0731%26 Sept →
ancient13–110.0324%26 Sept →
mirage13–20.0213%26 Sept →
nuke8–130.0427%26 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0218%25 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0131%25 Sept →
ancient13–30.0623%25 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0315%25 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0731%25 Sept →
anubis11–130.0432%24 Sept →
cache13–50.0544%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.