Helten2

Helten2 — CS2 Stats

76561198039795182[U:1:79529454]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,839Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,098 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,839 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 9 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,098 +0 30 Aug31 Aug · 2 observations
3,0983,098peak 3,09830 Aug31 Aug
3,098Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,098
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 402 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHelten2FACEITLevel 10 · 3,098 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,098csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning75
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4951Last 10049%Win rateWLLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 428ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 436ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility4.8
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 68% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning7.5
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time434ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 490ms → last ⅓ avg 434ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 27 Mar
63%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 17 May
344msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · nuke, 13 Jun
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 15 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 65% over 17mirageWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA25151060%0.01
ancientC1971237%0.02
overpassS1711665%0.01
dust2A169756%0.00
infernoC94544%0.00
anubisC83538%0.02
mirageD6060%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,223Matches
53%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
84.5ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient29757%1.4618.7
Nuke24556%1.4418.8
Overpass12758%1.3720.0
Anubis6850%1.3218.0
Inferno6863%1.3719.3
Dust26647%1.1517.8
Train6363%1.4518.7
Vertigo5355%1.5718.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
43.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
433msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
68.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
5.15HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9109% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0022%13 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0513%13 Jun
ancient10–130.0727%13 Jun
ancient13–100.0114%13 Jun
overpass13–11-0.060%13 Jun
nuke11–130.013%13 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0718%13 Jun
dust213–110.0121%13 Jun
overpass13–100.017%12 Jun
ancient13–16-0.024%12 Jun
inferno17–190.0345%12 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0020%12 Jun
dust29–130.0314%23 May
inferno16–140.049%23 May
ancient9–130.0019%23 May
nuke11–130.0110%20 May
inferno7–13-0.0521%20 May
ancient13–11-0.0420%20 May
nuke13–90.044%19 May
ancient6–130.0315%19 May
inferno13–80.0335%19 May
anubis13–160.0521%17 May
ancient8–130.0515%17 May
nuke13–70.0163%17 May
anubis13–160.0521%17 May
ancient8–130.0515%17 May
nuke13–70.0163%17 May
dust213–60.024%17 May
overpass13–100.0733%17 May
overpass13–100.0733%17 May
dust213–60.024%17 May
nuke13–110.0525%16 May
dust213–20.0417%16 May
nuke13–110.0525%16 May
dust213–20.0417%16 May
dust210–13-0.0315%16 May
inferno4–13-0.0132%16 May
dust210–13-0.0315%16 May
anubis13–90.0630%16 May
ancient22–250.039%16 May
nuke19–160.0124%16 May
anubis13–90.0630%16 May
ancient22–250.039%16 May
nuke19–160.0124%16 May
ancient3–13-0.0933%15 May
nuke13–60.0525%15 May
nuke13–90.0324%15 May
nuke13–10.0425%15 May
inferno13–20.0315%15 May
dust26–13-0.0322%13 May
inferno8–13-0.0425%13 May
ancient13–10-0.017%13 May
inferno13–90.0721%12 May
ancient7–13-0.0224%12 May
dust216–12-0.0125%12 May
overpass3–13-0.0917%26 Apr
nuke7–130.0416%26 Apr
ancient13–50.0917%26 Apr
dust213–50.0650%26 Apr
nuke9–130.0316%26 Apr
anubis13–110.0112%26 Apr
dust219–170.0723%25 Apr
nuke13–90.0433%25 Apr
anubis0–100.0129%22 Apr
overpass8–13-0.020%22 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0536%8 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0417%6 Apr
nuke14–160.0540%6 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0314%6 Apr
ancient13–50.1222%27 Mar
mirage11–130.0122%27 Mar
mirage9–130.0419%27 Mar
overpass13–70.0323%27 Mar
dust26–13-0.0520%24 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0218%24 Mar
dust26–13-0.0421%19 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0433%19 Mar
overpass11–130.0327%18 Mar
overpass13–90.0137%17 Mar
nuke1–13-0.0225%17 Mar
dust24–13-0.0717%17 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0316%14 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0116%14 Mar
ancient8–130.0138%14 Mar
ancient8–130.0138%14 Mar
overpass13–40.0519%14 Mar
dust213–50.0338%14 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0233%9 Mar
overpass13–80.0520%9 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0019%9 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0019%9 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0233%9 Mar
overpass13–80.0520%9 Mar
overpass13–100.0529%9 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0425%9 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0425%9 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0321%9 Mar
overpass13–100.0529%9 Mar
ancient13–70.0222%9 Mar
nuke22–200.0412%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →