Satic

Satic — CS2 Stats

NL76561198039256993[U:1:78991265]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,579Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,875Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating30,135Top 1% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#584 of 261641 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,718 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 30,135 +2,159 31 Aug – 14 Nov · 30 days played
26,60430,432peak 30,43231 Aug14 Nov
30,432Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,718Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,718
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 282 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 297 below peak (30,432)
  • +1,495 over 30 days · improving
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches7579−4
Win rate51%58%−8pp
K/D0.891.02−0.13
Headshot %55%53%+1pp

Measured 20 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; previous 16 Sep 2026 → 20 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate50.9%50.9%
Shot accuracy11.2%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.171.09
Match win rate47.5%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSaticFACEITLevel 10 · 2,718 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER30,135 · Gold bandPEAK ELO2,718csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning44
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateWLWWLLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility7.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.6

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.4
Utility7.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time516ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 2 Nov →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 2 Nov →
344msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 14 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2113–862%0.03
mirageA1811–761%0.01
ancientD133–1023%0.01
anubisS128–467%0.01
cacheD124–833%0.01
dust2D124–833%-0.01
infernoC73–443%-0.04
office—41–325%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

184,598Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
8,749Matches
47.5%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
20,748MVPs
3,520Hours (in match)
7,348Bombs planted
1,878Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4759,273
AWP22,524
SSG 084,998
Molotov4,552
MP93,988
Knife3,297

Lifetime map wins

21,069dust2
7,419inferno
6,039nuke
3,039vertigo
1,836train
994office
941cbble
428italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

937Matches
56%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
75.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6362%1.2115.1
Ancient4269%1.0614.4
Nuke3158%1.1317.0
Anubis2458%1.3915.8
Dust22446%1.1314.8
Inferno2090%1.2215.8
Train1145%0.9114.6
Overpass956%0.9513.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
522msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
26.5%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
10.62HE damage / grenade
15.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 26.4665% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–20.0318%14 Nov →
anubis8–130.0310%14 Nov →
anubis13–20.0821%14 Nov →
cache13–6-0.0221%14 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0511%14 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0218%14 Nov →
nuke5–130.0033%12 Nov →
mirage13–40.026%12 Nov →
mirage2–130.0226%12 Nov →
nuke15–150.0419%12 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.0228%11 Nov →
ancient13–70.0615%11 Nov →
nuke13–40.0624%11 Nov →
inferno13–6-0.0513%10 Nov →
mirage13–100.0212%10 Nov →
mirage16–14-0.0121%9 Nov →
ancient7–130.0213%9 Nov →
ancient15–15-0.0419%9 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0527%8 Nov →
cache16–130.1022%8 Nov →
dust29–130.0215%8 Nov →
cache13–110.0428%8 Nov →
dust22–13-0.1110%8 Nov →
anubis13–80.0213%8 Nov →
ancient13–60.0215%8 Nov →
inferno8–130.0227%8 Nov →
nuke15–15-0.0618%8 Nov →
dust213–7-0.0029%7 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0310%7 Nov →
anubis13–5-0.0114%7 Nov →
mirage13–00.0616%7 Nov →
anubis13–50.0420%7 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0421%7 Nov →
nuke13–20.0421%7 Nov →
cache13–40.0519%7 Nov →
ancient7–130.0316%7 Nov →
nuke13–90.0816%6 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0215%6 Nov →
nuke13–90.0618%6 Nov →
nuke0–6-0.0933%6 Nov →
office5–13-0.0624%6 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0517%4 Nov →
nuke13–40.0819%4 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0027%4 Nov →
cache1–13-0.037%4 Nov →
mirage13–9-0.0411%3 Nov →
anubis0–13-0.0528%3 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0231%3 Nov →
nuke13–40.1439%2 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.0729%2 Nov →
nuke7–130.0013%1 Nov →
office13–40.0135%1 Nov →
office4–13-0.0035%1 Nov →
office11–13-0.0227%1 Nov →
train12–12-0.0319%31 Oct →
mirage16–130.0116%27 Oct →
anubis16–130.0216%27 Oct →
dust29–130.0229%27 Oct →
cache12–120.0424%25 Oct →
nuke10–130.0432%24 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.029%24 Oct →
nuke16–130.0229%22 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0121%22 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0110%21 Oct →
cache11–130.0331%21 Oct →
dust29–130.009%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0020%21 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0125%20 Oct →
dust213–110.0319%20 Oct →
mirage13–40.0730%19 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0327%19 Oct →
ancient13–20.0418%19 Oct →
mirage13–10.0811%19 Oct →
nuke13–60.0815%19 Oct →
dust213–20.0819%19 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0227%18 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0021%18 Oct →
dust213–40.0319%18 Oct →
nuke13–30.0220%18 Oct →
mirage11–130.0017%18 Oct →
ancient9–130.0124%18 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.095%18 Oct →
nuke13–80.0116%18 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0125%18 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0518%18 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0222%18 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0421%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.0415%17 Oct →
ancient8–130.0527%17 Oct →
nuke13–30.0624%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.0118%17 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0226%17 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0320%17 Oct →
mirage5–130.0024%17 Oct →
dust23–13-0.089%17 Oct →
nuke13–80.0719%13 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0222%13 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0421%11 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0030%10 Oct →
ancient4–130.1227%10 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.