Juan Wick — CS2 Stats

DE76561198038281268[U:1:78015540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

527Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,941Purple band · top ~16.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#29156 of 60490 tracked

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning67

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–48–7Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression10.0

Utility4.9

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels5.4

Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning6.7

Utility4.9

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels5.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time559ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms

Headshot accuracy12.7%+0.0%

first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — inferno 9–3

13–0Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	41	18–23	44%	0.03
dust2	C	17	6–11	35%	0.02
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	0.03
anubis	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.00
mirage	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
nuke	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.19
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches

49%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

91.8ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

67%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	1	100%	1.27	19.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.46	19.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.06	17.0
Dust2	1	0%	1.13	17.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.95	18.0
Cache	1	0%	1.43	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

85.4%Counter-strafing

8.2°Preaim

564msReaction time

52.6%T opening success

50.7%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

6.8%Flash assists

9.97HE damage / grenade

4.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.9384% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4058 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	0.01	10%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	26%	20 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.06	9%	18 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	9%	12 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	15%	10 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.10	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.06	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	13%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	10%	8 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	13%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	8%	7 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	15%	6 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.01	12%	30 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.03	7%	27 Jul →
inferno	8–6	0.04	8%	27 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.04	9%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	20%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	11%	23 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	9%	20 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.11	14%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.01	8%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	14%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–2	-0.01	0%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	11%	19 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.07	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.01	19%	18 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.01	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	12%	18 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.01	11%	17 Jul →
inferno	2–9	-0.14	0%	17 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.03	16%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	11%	16 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.05	9%	16 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	3%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	21%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	8%	15 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.05	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	3%	14 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	9%	14 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.08	18%	14 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	7%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	8%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.13	18%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.07	11%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	12%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	7%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.05	11%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	15%	13 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.03	10%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	6%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	10%	12 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	4%	12 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.00	5%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	9%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.01	3%	10 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.10	7%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	16%	9 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	8%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	15%	8 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	17%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	2%	6 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	12%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.06	18%	5 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.04	8%	5 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.30	10%	5 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.05	16%	3 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	18%	3 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	15%	3 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	21%	3 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.05	16%	3 Jul →
cache	1–13	0.01	18%	3 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.01	6%	2 Jul →
sanctum	6–9	-0.19	0%	2 Jul →
poseidon	9–3	0.09	3%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.00	24%	1 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.01	17%	1 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	15%	1 Jul →
vertigo	6–9	0.09	15%	1 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.03	11%	1 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.13	9%	30 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.09	17%	30 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.08	6%	30 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	8%	30 Jun →
overpass	13–0	0.02	19%	30 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.09	14%	29 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.05	8%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.05	11%	29 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	9%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	15%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.07	11%	29 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.01	11%	28 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.19	14%	28 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.10	8%	28 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.07	12%	28 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.17	16%	28 Jun →