bee

bee — CS2 Stats

US76561198038078716[U:1:77812988]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

555Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,455Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,513Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48294 of 252702 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,513 +5,718 17 Aug – 24 Sept · 21 days played
16,33822,513peak 22,51317 Aug24 Sept
22,735Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,513
  • +2,514 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,487 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.1%42.7%43.7%3.6% short
Shot accuracy15.1%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.000.991.02meets
Match win rate44.9%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbeeFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,513 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning59
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.6pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch1.6

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time551ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 29 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 3–2 · inferno, 29 Aug →
398msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · anubis, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2810–1836%0.00
dust2A2113–862%0.01
cacheA2012–860%0.02
infernoS1712–571%0.03
anubisD72–529%0.01
ancientS54–180%0.03
nuke—20–20%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,133Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,755Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
40.1%Headshot %
15.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
7,294MVPs
1,455Hours (in match)
3,031Bombs planted
811Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,219
AWP9,178
FAMAS1,691
P2501,560
Tec-91,037

Lifetime map wins

10,798dust2
4,962inferno
1,088nuke
731train
223vertigo
174cbble
66dust
23office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
45%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
84.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1242%1.0413.5
Inferno743%1.2118.1
Dust23100%2.2019.0
Train367%1.2018.0
Anubis3100%2.0022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
546msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.58HE damage / grenade
5.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3723% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.057%24 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0113%23 Sept →
ancient13–60.055%21 Sept →
inferno13–60.0713%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0424%8 Sept →
cache7–2-0.0013%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0018%8 Sept →
inferno13–10.1127%8 Sept →
cache10–130.0211%8 Sept →
anubis16–130.024%8 Sept →
ancient8–130.0217%8 Sept →
mirage5–130.0123%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0924%7 Sept →
dust213–160.0918%7 Sept →
dust25–130.0233%7 Sept →
inferno13–20.0619%7 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0418%7 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0010%7 Sept →
dust213–80.0013%7 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0225%6 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0521%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0014%6 Sept →
inferno13–30.1230%2 Sept →
cache13–110.0511%2 Sept →
inferno13–20.0815%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0828%1 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0115%1 Sept →
anubis5–130.0617%1 Sept →
dust210–13-0.017%1 Sept →
cache13–90.0522%1 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0725%31 Aug →
dust28–130.0017%31 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0725%31 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0013%31 Aug →
dust26–130.0120%31 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0018%31 Aug →
dust213–80.0120%31 Aug →
anubis15–150.0111%29 Aug →
cache13–30.1310%29 Aug →
mirage13–80.0417%29 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0414%29 Aug →
inferno3–2-0.07100%29 Aug →
cache2–13-0.1013%27 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0519%27 Aug →
mirage13–90.1331%27 Aug →
mirage15–150.019%27 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0621%27 Aug →
mirage15–150.0916%27 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.019%27 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0316%27 Aug →
dust213–110.046%26 Aug →
dust213–50.1117%25 Aug →
cache13–100.0217%25 Aug →
mirage13–10.0113%25 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0218%25 Aug →
mirage13–60.055%25 Aug →
anubis11–130.0210%25 Aug →
dust216–130.0620%25 Aug →
mirage7–130.0018%25 Aug →
cache13–80.0015%25 Aug →
cache10–130.0313%25 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.039%25 Aug →
ancient13–100.0011%25 Aug →
ancient13–110.0515%24 Aug →
cache15–150.0112%24 Aug →
mirage13–100.0013%24 Aug →
inferno13–70.0419%24 Aug →
dust213–110.0718%24 Aug →
cache8–130.0812%24 Aug →
mirage10–130.0221%23 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0219%23 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0021%22 Aug →
mirage13–20.1044%22 Aug →
cache13–70.0618%22 Aug →
mirage7–130.0224%21 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0314%21 Aug →
dust216–130.0523%21 Aug →
inferno13–10.1215%21 Aug →
cache15–150.0117%21 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0415%21 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0318%20 Aug →
cache13–70.1016%20 Aug →
inferno13–50.068%20 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0914%20 Aug →
inferno13–80.0412%20 Aug →
inferno13–40.0720%20 Aug →
mirage9–130.0018%20 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0215%20 Aug →
mirage13–60.0515%19 Aug →
inferno11–130.0117%19 Aug →
mirage13–30.0221%19 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0420%19 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0611%19 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0317%19 Aug →
mirage10–130.0318%19 Aug →
mirage7–130.015%19 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0010%19 Aug →
dust22–10.0533%19 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0218%17 Aug →
dust215–150.0116%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.