GreenKolibri — CS2 Stats

76561198037957001[U:1:77691273]

3,427Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating28,080Top 5% of 206,528 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2434 of 253583 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,145 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,080 +4,316 26 Jul – 17 Oct · 18 days played
23,42528,444peak 28,44426 Jul17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,145 +0 1 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
2,1452,145peak 2,1451 Sept23 Sept
28,445Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,145Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,145
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 355 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 364 below peak (28,444)
  • +3,446 over 30 days · improving
  • +4,316 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,920 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGreenKolibriFACEITLevel 10 · 2,145 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,080 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,145csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning63
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–39–1Last 10060%Win rateLWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time503ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 13 Aug →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 11 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 23nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3019–1163%0.01
cacheS2315–865%-0.01
dust2A148–657%0.01
ancientA138–562%0.00
anubisA85–363%-0.00
nukeD62–433%-0.02
mirageC52–340%-0.01
rush_001—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,575Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust219550%1.0213.5
Ancient18744%0.9614.8
Inferno17651%1.0414.3
Nuke12453%1.1415.2
Anubis11647%0.8512.7
Mirage3741%0.9414.7
Overpass3546%0.8813.4
Cache1669%0.9213.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
502msReaction time
55.1%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
12.39HE damage / grenade
8.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.6898% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache3–13-0.0422%17 Oct →
inferno13–50.0746%17 Oct →
cache13–70.0525%17 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0311%17 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0217%17 Oct →
inferno9–130.0117%16 Oct →
cache13–90.0124%16 Oct →
dust27–130.0124%16 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0232%15 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0123%15 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0023%15 Oct →
cache19–17-0.0424%14 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0218%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0119%14 Oct →
rush_0015–10.0918%14 Oct →
inferno13–160.0323%14 Oct →
inferno13–80.0733%14 Oct →
mirage13–100.0523%14 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0723%14 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0215%13 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0126%13 Oct →
inferno13–70.0429%13 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0219%13 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0147%13 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0020%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0217%13 Oct →
ancient13–40.0320%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0247%11 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0117%11 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0418%11 Oct →
dust213–60.0334%11 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0721%11 Oct →
dust213–100.0021%11 Oct →
inferno13–20.0729%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0523%8 Oct →
dust213–100.0627%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0130%4 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0219%20 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0325%20 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0424%20 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0316%20 Aug →
ancient6–130.0215%20 Aug →
cache16–130.0115%20 Aug →
inferno13–70.0421%20 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0323%19 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0018%18 Aug →
cache13–80.0227%17 Aug →
ancient13–60.0721%17 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0617%17 Aug →
inferno10–130.0127%16 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0410%16 Aug →
cache13–10-0.058%16 Aug →
cache13–100.0418%16 Aug →
cache13–40.0125%16 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0424%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0221%15 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0129%15 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0112%15 Aug →
ancient13–60.0316%13 Aug →
anubis13–30.1029%13 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0113%13 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0118%13 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0816%11 Aug →
cache13–110.0521%11 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0421%4 Aug →
nuke13–70.0521%4 Aug →
inferno13–110.1028%4 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0222%4 Aug →
ancient13–30.033%4 Aug →
inferno13–40.0328%4 Aug →
ancient13–50.0214%3 Aug →
inferno13–80.0514%3 Aug →
inferno13–20.0422%3 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0314%31 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0218%30 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0226%30 Jul →
cache13–30.0726%30 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0020%29 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0124%29 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0319%29 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0229%29 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0611%29 Jul →
anubis13–80.0220%29 Jul →
dust213–70.0212%29 Jul →
anubis13–80.0223%29 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0438%29 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0528%28 Jul →
inferno13–90.0725%28 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.059%27 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0530%27 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0318%27 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0522%27 Jul →
dust213–50.0623%27 Jul →
ancient13–50.0324%27 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0819%27 Jul →
dust215–150.0212%27 Jul →
inferno13–40.0328%27 Jul →
inferno13–160.0233%26 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0421%26 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0116%26 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.