HRT

HRT — CS2 Stats

76561198036374247[U:1:76108519]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,929Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,156Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,634Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,468 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,929 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 16 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,634 -217 16 Jun18 Sept · 22 days played
17,55520,371peak 20,37116 Jun18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,468 +0 3 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,4681,468peak 1,4683 Sept18 Sept
20,371Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,468Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-06-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,468
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 63 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,737 below peak (20,371)
  • -877 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,466 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,366 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,334), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.6%46.8%48.3%2.7% short
Shot accuracy4.6%13.0%13.2%8.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.061.070.12 short
Match win rate45.1%46.3%46.9%1.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHRTFACEITLevel 8 · 1,468 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,634 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,468csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning62
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55432Last 10055%Win rateLLWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.2
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time569ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−5.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 21 Jul
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 21 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 12 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 25 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 20infernoWeakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2591636%-0.01
ancientS2013765%-0.00
nukeS2014670%0.01
anubisA127558%0.02
dust2B126650%0.01
cacheB63350%0.00
mirage2020%-0.03
overpass220100%0.02
office110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,840Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
4,677Matches
45.1%Match win rate
45.6%Headshot %
4.6%Shot accuracy
10,978MVPs
1,715Hours (in match)
6,365Bombs planted
1,140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,026
AWP9,920
MAC-102,458
Knife1,593
MP91,431

Lifetime map wins

12,919inferno
4,728dust2
3,856nuke
2,611vertigo
1,027train
630office
31safehouse
29lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,650Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient40952%1.0816.8
Inferno37752%1.0716.3
Anubis19949%0.9714.7
Nuke17248%1.0216.1
Dust213341%0.9515.0
Mirage8445%1.0515.2
Overpass8061%1.1016.0
Train6154%1.2318.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
564msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
58.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
14.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2366% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0815%10 Sept
nuke10–130.0117%10 Sept
inferno13–70.0415%9 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0725%9 Sept
inferno14–160.0123%7 Sept
anubis13–110.0522%4 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0327%3 Sept
ancient13–90.0422%1 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0611%1 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0215%31 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0117%31 Aug
ancient13–9-0.055%29 Aug
nuke13–10.0421%25 Aug
ancient9–130.0213%24 Aug
cache13–60.0218%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0217%24 Aug
inferno13–100.0320%24 Aug
anubis13–40.0723%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0212%23 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0246%21 Aug
dust213–110.0228%21 Aug
nuke13–100.0118%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0621%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0621%20 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0329%18 Aug
inferno13–80.0623%18 Aug
anubis10–130.0314%17 Aug
nuke13–60.0319%17 Aug
ancient31–28-0.0314%17 Aug
inferno16–120.0528%16 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0314%12 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0313%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0026%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0114%4 Aug
cache11–130.0015%2 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0115%1 Aug
dust213–11-0.0213%31 Jul
ancient13–60.0214%31 Jul
nuke22–19-0.0119%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0315%28 Jul
nuke13–90.0714%28 Jul
nuke13–80.0835%27 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0410%24 Jul
nuke13–70.1515%21 Jul
dust26–130.0524%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0318%20 Jul
inferno15–19-0.0517%17 Jul
cache13–40.0414%15 Jul
ancient13–60.016%15 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0510%14 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1112%14 Jul
nuke9–13-0.024%13 Jul
nuke12–160.0319%12 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0617%12 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0412%12 Jul
cache13–110.0113%12 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1110%10 Jul
cache5–13-0.0126%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.0514%9 Jul
ancient13–100.0215%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0533%9 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0310%9 Jul
inferno13–110.0420%9 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0219%9 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0119%9 Jul
office13–100.0729%6 Jul
dust213–80.1029%6 Jul
nuke17–190.0417%6 Jul
inferno10–130.0815%3 Jul
inferno12–160.0327%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0228%2 Jul
ancient13–110.0625%26 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0227%26 Jun
inferno15–150.0231%25 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0120%23 Jun
inferno4–13-0.1129%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0318%20 Jun
anubis13–60.1126%20 Jun
ancient13–90.0116%20 Jun
dust215–150.0221%20 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0926%20 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0324%20 Jun
anubis13–110.0018%20 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0532%19 Jun
dust212–16-0.0041%18 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0238%18 Jun
dust213–50.0635%17 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0417%17 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0417%17 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0328%17 Jun
dust28–13-0.0311%17 Jun
anubis13–60.0530%17 Jun
inferno9–130.0239%17 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0015%17 Jun
overpass13–30.0841%17 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0329%17 Jun
dust213–8-0.0131%17 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0421%16 Jun
ancient8–1-0.0329%16 Jun
nuke13–70.0419%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →