❄︎Lord Thanatos❄

❄︎Lord Thanatos❄ — CS2 Stats

GB76561198035776156[U:1:75510428]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

271Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,073Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,377 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,377 → 1,377
+18Tracked matches · now 271
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,377 +0 28 Aug11 Sept · 4 observations
1,3771,377peak 1,37728 Aug11 Sept
1,377Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,377
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 154 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches189+9
Win rate44%67%−22pp
K/D0.971.00−0.03
Headshot %60%68%−8pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate42.5%48.3%51.0%8.5% short
Shot accuracy16.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.071.09above
Match win rate41.9%46.9%48.4%6.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG❄︎Lord Thanatos❄FACEITLevel 9 · 1,377 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,377csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning43
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.9
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 13.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time592ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–13 · nuke, 14 Jul
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 7 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 26 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB30141647%0.01
nukeS1711665%0.01
ancientC167944%0.01
cacheS1510567%0.02
infernoC135838%-0.02
mirageA85363%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,294Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3,636Matches
41.9%Match win rate
42.5%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
9,325MVPs
1,944Hours (in match)
3,926Bombs planted
1,007Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,101
AWP11,271
P902,923
P2501,975
Tec-91,842
FAMAS1,573

Lifetime map wins

14,103inferno
4,340dust2
2,093nuke
1,055cbble
907train
704vertigo
240office
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

450Matches
49%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
80.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5560%1.0615.3
Ancient3450%1.2816.1
Nuke3370%1.2217.1
Mirage3142%1.0315.8
Inferno2733%1.0115.2
Cache2560%1.1616.8
Vertigo2100%0.9316.5
Dust2250%0.709.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
89.1%Counter-strafing
13.1°Preaim
583msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.89HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.0837° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0223%16 Sept
ancient13–10.0418%16 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0416%16 Sept
anubis4–13-0.1020%15 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0921%10 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0216%10 Sept
nuke13–70.0221%10 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0117%8 Sept
ancient13–70.1025%8 Sept
nuke13–80.0928%7 Sept
cache13–6-0.0447%7 Sept
cache13–70.0635%6 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0232%6 Sept
mirage13–80.1228%3 Sept
anubis10–130.0026%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0912%26 Aug
nuke13–20.0220%26 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0317%26 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0219%23 Aug
anubis4–13-0.1016%23 Aug
anubis13–110.0221%21 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0125%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0530%20 Aug
cache13–80.0846%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0332%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0817%18 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0231%17 Aug
cache10–130.0220%16 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0427%16 Aug
cache9–130.0428%16 Aug
anubis16–140.0420%15 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0325%15 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0224%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0136%15 Aug
anubis13–70.0320%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0326%14 Aug
anubis13–80.0129%13 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0624%13 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0422%13 Aug
anubis10–130.0022%13 Aug
anubis6–130.0339%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0431%7 Aug
ancient13–60.0133%7 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0421%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0234%6 Aug
ancient19–16-0.0121%6 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0233%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0232%6 Aug
nuke25–230.0016%5 Aug
anubis11–130.0122%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0314%2 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0115%2 Aug
ancient8–130.1120%1 Aug
mirage16–140.0019%1 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0214%30 Jul
anubis13–1-0.0317%30 Jul
nuke28–26-0.0028%30 Jul
anubis13–90.0423%29 Jul
nuke13–110.0522%29 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0921%29 Jul
cache13–80.1238%28 Jul
cache13–60.0820%28 Jul
ancient16–140.0431%20 Jul
anubis11–130.0117%20 Jul
cache16–14-0.0319%20 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0718%20 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0314%19 Jul
anubis15–19-0.0214%19 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0317%19 Jul
cache10–13-0.0123%18 Jul
ancient13–40.097%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0218%18 Jul
cache13–90.0420%15 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0115%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0126%14 Jul
ancient10–130.0320%14 Jul
anubis13–60.0723%14 Jul
nuke9–130.1319%14 Jul
cache2–13-0.0721%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0712%14 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0318%13 Jul
cache13–10-0.0634%13 Jul
anubis13–90.0028%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0135%12 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0311%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0120%12 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0123%12 Jul
cache13–60.0315%12 Jul
inferno9–130.0233%11 Jul
anubis13–80.0717%11 Jul
nuke13–100.0324%11 Jul
anubis10–130.0124%11 Jul
anubis13–30.0520%9 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0120%9 Jul
mirage13–60.0128%9 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0222%9 Jul
cache13–30.0222%6 Jul
anubis13–80.1022%4 Jul
anubis11–130.0931%3 Jul
inferno12–160.0219%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →