Rhedox

Rhedox — CS2 Stats

DE76561198035539468[U:1:75273740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,105Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,901Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 23 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,932 -6,431 23 Mar2 Jul · 21 days played
14,33922,257peak 22,25723 Mar2 Jul
22,257Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-03-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.0%45.7%46.8%1.8% short
Shot accuracy16.3%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.051.06meets
Match win rate61.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRhedoxFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning45
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43534Last 10043%Win rateWLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +7.9pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility2.9
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.5
Utility2.9
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time655ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · boulder, 11 Jul
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · inferno, 9 Aug
484msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 30 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

shelterBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
overpassA169756%-0.02
dust2D1541127%-0.02
cacheA148657%-0.02
infernoB147750%-0.02
nukeD112918%-0.05
anubisD82625%-0.05
shelterS54180%0.02
fachwerkA53260%-0.06
mirageD5050%-0.05
boulder32167%0.01
ancient21150%-0.02
sanctum21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

204,177Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
13,370Matches
61.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 7 players
45.0%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
26,336MVPs
4,040Hours (in match)
7,866Bombs planted
1,798Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4781,891
AWP8,182
FAMAS4,862
UMP-454,782
P2504,452

Lifetime map wins

11,955inferno
4,916nuke
4,615dust2
2,495office
2,156vertigo
1,699train
1,564cbble
310bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

813Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
52.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1030%0.9916.6
Overpass875%0.8414.5
Ancient580%0.8611.6
Inferno580%0.9012.8
Vertigo580%1.1016.2
Dust23100%0.6511.0
Mirage250%0.707.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
660msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
30.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
2.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3903 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5906% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter13–40.0932%5 Sept
boulder8–13-0.078%5 Sept
fachwerk13–4-0.0319%5 Sept
fachwerk11–13-0.0415%28 Aug
cache13–4-0.0221%28 Aug
overpass13–5-0.0614%28 Aug
overpass5–13-0.0512%28 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1043%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0323%9 Aug
shelter13–6-0.0415%15 Jul
fachwerk13–8-0.1213%15 Jul
shelter13–9-0.007%11 Jul
fachwerk13–7-0.049%11 Jul
shelter13–110.0825%11 Jul
boulder13–40.1010%11 Jul
fachwerk0–13-0.0812%11 Jul
boulder13–11-0.0010%9 Jul
shelter6–13-0.0411%8 Jul
inferno13–70.0214%2 Jul
dust213–50.1013%2 Jul
dust213–10.0415%2 Jul
overpass8–13-0.079%2 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0514%30 Jun
anubis10–130.0021%30 Jun
inferno7–13-0.065%30 Jun
dust25–13-0.0814%30 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0316%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0518%30 Jun
anubis11–13-0.084%30 Jun
dust29–130.0417%30 Jun
cache13–100.0322%28 Jun
overpass13–30.0221%28 Jun
anubis4–13-0.096%28 Jun
overpass13–100.0015%24 Jun
mirage15–15-0.035%24 Jun
anubis13–9-0.029%24 Jun
inferno13–30.0314%24 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0312%24 Jun
inferno13–70.0217%24 Jun
dust28–13-0.0413%24 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0114%16 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0416%15 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0421%15 Jun
nuke10–130.0016%14 Jun
anubis15–15-0.068%13 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0610%12 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0211%12 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0212%2 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0715%2 Jun
overpass1–13-0.1018%2 Jun
overpass13–90.0312%2 Jun
dust216–130.0017%25 May
cache13–30.0518%19 May
cache4–13-0.0810%19 May
cache13–80.0024%19 May
cache4–13-0.0342%15 May
cache13–10-0.0619%15 May
cache13–9-0.038%15 May
cache5–13-0.0618%14 May
cache13–7-0.0414%30 Apr
cache7–13-0.0414%30 Apr
cache6–13-0.0423%30 Apr
cache13–3-0.0130%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0021%29 Apr
dust27–13-0.0317%27 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0514%27 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0322%27 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0516%27 Apr
dust27–13-0.0315%24 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0216%24 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0826%24 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0221%24 Apr
inferno13–70.0921%23 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0619%23 Apr
nuke2–13-0.096%23 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0421%23 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0311%19 Apr
overpass13–40.0922%19 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0618%19 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0423%19 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0717%19 Apr
dust22–13-0.117%19 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0813%12 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0633%8 Apr
dust215–150.0119%8 Apr
dust26–13-0.1110%5 Apr
dust211–13-0.0216%5 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0810%5 Apr
dust24–13-0.0526%29 Mar
dust213–90.0220%29 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0224%29 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0317%26 Mar
dust28–13-0.0316%26 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0525%26 Mar
sanctum9–50.0917%25 Mar
sanctum4–9-0.1432%25 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0210%25 Mar
anubis13–8-0.025%23 Mar
overpass13–90.0014%23 Mar
overpass9–6-0.0017%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →