|Kyrpex|

|Kyrpex| — CS2 Stats

FI76561198035509479[U:1:75243751]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,478Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,372Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,893Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78365 of 229897 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,478 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 23 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,893 +118 15 Aug4 Sept · 4 days played
19,77519,893peak 19,89315 Aug4 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,786 +0 30 Aug4 Sept · 2 observations
1,7861,786peak 1,78630 Aug4 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,786Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2025-10-23

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,893
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 107 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,167), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate55.6%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy19.3%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.451.071.09above
Match win rate25.0%46.9%48.4%23.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG|Kyrpex|FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,893 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,786csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning57
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56404Last 10056%Win rateLWLTWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · −82ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.7
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time591ms−118ms
first ⅓ avg 708ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–6 · overpass, 24 Feb
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · overpass, 24 Feb
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 15 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 24 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1881044%-0.02
mirageS1711665%0.00
ancientS1511473%0.00
nukeS139469%0.01
infernoC114736%-0.02
anubisA117464%0.01
dust2C52340%0.06
overpassA53260%0.09
fachwerk2020%0.00
poseidon21150%0.02
eldorado1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

190,482Lifetime kills
1.45K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
6,157Matches
25.0%Match win rate
55.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
19.3%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 9 players
9,998MVPs
4,372Hours (in match)
3,618Bombs planted
1,057Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47105,571
AWP12,210
UMP-451,745
FAMAS1,617
P901,576

Lifetime map wins

6,207inferno
3,933nuke
3,887dust2
1,389train
719vertigo
193office
190cbble
101assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

970Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4060%1.0115.0
Anubis3067%1.1215.8
Mirage3040%1.0014.7
Nuke2564%1.1315.9
Inferno2148%0.9614.7
Dust21735%0.9214.4
Overpass1560%1.0715.3
Cache838%0.9216.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
588msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
3.83HE damage / grenade
5.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4783 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0376% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0629%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0217%16 Aug
dust210–130.0236%15 Aug
fachwerk12–120.0024%15 Aug
inferno13–50.0214%15 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0526%15 Aug
cache13–60.0540%15 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0218%15 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0216%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0021%14 Aug
ancient13–70.0823%14 Aug
dust213–50.1223%14 Aug
nuke13–100.0220%14 Aug
cache13–80.0415%14 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0418%6 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0119%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0414%30 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0114%30 Jul
anubis13–4-0.037%30 Jul
inferno13–110.0021%30 Jul
mirage13–40.0216%29 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0512%29 Jul
ancient13–6-0.029%29 Jul
cache8–130.0022%29 Jul
nuke13–30.1417%29 Jul
cache7–130.0313%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0022%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0214%29 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0811%28 Jul
cache13–100.0119%28 Jul
fachwerk12–120.0020%27 Jul
anubis7–130.0218%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0418%23 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0513%23 Jul
cache10–13-0.0415%23 Jul
cache16–130.029%22 Jul
ancient13–90.0113%22 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0016%22 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0416%22 Jul
inferno4–13-0.087%22 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0418%21 Jul
mirage13–110.0517%21 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0124%21 Jul
ancient13–40.029%21 Jul
ancient10–130.0312%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.0211%21 Jul
anubis13–80.0118%21 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0115%21 Jul
nuke9–130.0122%21 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0229%21 Jul
ancient13–60.0710%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0618%20 Jul
nuke13–30.0636%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0424%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0222%18 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0410%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0525%18 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0324%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0537%17 Jul
ancient10–130.0422%17 Jul
cache12–12-0.0313%17 Jul
mirage6–130.0113%17 Jul
anubis13–70.0112%17 Jul
cache15–190.0227%17 Jul
cache13–30.009%17 Jul
ancient9–130.0113%17 Jul
anubis13–100.0323%16 Jul
dust23–13-0.0327%16 Jul
ancient13–110.0213%16 Jul
anubis13–80.0319%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0633%15 Jul
poseidon7–90.0523%15 Jul
eldorado8–8-0.0013%15 Jul
poseidon9–7-0.0119%15 Jul
inferno10–130.0117%14 Jul
cache13–9-0.0615%14 Jul
ancient13–8-0.069%14 Jul
cache8–13-0.0333%14 Jul
inferno13–40.0715%21 May
anubis13–100.0720%21 May
ancient13–8-0.0318%21 May
overpass13–9-0.0019%20 May
cache7–13-0.0922%1 May
cache13–10-0.0523%1 May
nuke4–13-0.0729%1 May
mirage5–13-0.0725%1 May
cache4–13-0.0824%30 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0320%20 Mar
overpass8–130.0722%20 Mar
overpass8–30.1216%20 Mar
overpass1–13-0.0513%20 Mar
mirage13–40.0317%20 Mar
dust213–80.1527%28 Feb
inferno9–7-0.0519%25 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0021%25 Feb
mirage13–80.0125%25 Feb
mirage13–1-0.0326%24 Feb
overpass9–60.3341%24 Feb
inferno2–9-0.0121%23 Feb
mirage11–130.0220%23 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →