Arppe

Arppe — CS2 Stats

76561198035441153[U:1:75175425]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,564Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19792 of 232092 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,904 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,564 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 9 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +1,363 16 Aug16 Sept · 10 days played
23,63725,237peak 25,23716 Aug16 Sept
25,562Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,904Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,904
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 237 below peak (25,237)
  • +1,363 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGArppeFACEITLevel 10 · 1,904 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,904csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning51
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49429Last 10049%Win rateLLWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.1
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time500ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 11 Aug
54%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · office, 29 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · ancient, 28 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeA2112957%0.05
nukeC156940%0.02
infernoA148657%0.02
dust2C104640%0.00
trainC94544%0.02
cacheC94544%0.01
mirageD71614%0.01
ancientB63350%-0.02
anubisA53260%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.05
overpass220100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,111Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
77.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11348%1.1915.4
Inferno8153%1.2015.8
Nuke7056%1.2717.3
Dust26647%1.1415.8
Vertigo6260%1.2218.1
Anubis6040%1.1216.0
Overpass4058%1.0815.7
Ancient3554%1.1314.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.0%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
496msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
59.6%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
6.07HE damage / grenade
11.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4612 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.6521% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0513%14 Sept
inferno10–130.0026%14 Sept
nuke13–00.1415%14 Sept
nuke9–130.1011%12 Sept
nuke16–130.0327%12 Sept
train11–130.0519%8 Sept
office13–20.0713%8 Sept
ancient8–13-0.029%4 Sept
office13–90.0311%3 Sept
dust213–70.0420%2 Sept
ancient13–7-0.029%31 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0224%30 Aug
nuke1–9-0.2021%30 Aug
mirage6–130.0519%29 Aug
dust215–150.0020%29 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0311%28 Aug
cache13–80.0519%28 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0413%28 Aug
cache13–100.0221%27 Aug
mirage4–130.0211%27 Aug
dust210–13-0.0127%27 Aug
dust24–13-0.0214%27 Aug
mirage11–130.0625%26 Aug
nuke13–20.0415%23 Aug
inferno13–90.0426%23 Aug
nuke8–130.0030%23 Aug
dust213–6-0.0810%23 Aug
office8–130.0918%20 Aug
ancient13–6-0.028%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0415%16 Aug
inferno13–10.0618%16 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1317%16 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0614%15 Aug
nuke13–30.0310%15 Aug
train7–130.0217%15 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1217%13 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0425%13 Aug
vertigo9–3-0.0138%12 Aug
inferno9–10.2038%11 Aug
office8–130.0820%2 Aug
train13–60.1229%2 Aug
office13–50.0634%2 Aug
office13–10-0.0117%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0322%31 Jul
train10–130.0216%31 Jul
inferno9–70.0725%30 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0315%30 Jul
office13–90.0120%29 Jul
cache3–13-0.0230%29 Jul
inferno13–100.0123%29 Jul
office12–120.1454%29 Jul
nuke4–00.020%29 Jul
vertigo13–100.1025%29 Jul
office13–10.0431%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0214%28 Jul
dust213–50.0426%28 Jul
inferno13–20.0918%28 Jul
nuke10–130.0419%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.0623%28 Jul
office13–60.0621%28 Jul
train12–12-0.0219%28 Jul
office13–50.0321%27 Jul
cache13–50.1927%27 Jul
office13–11-0.0313%26 Jul
anubis2–130.0122%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0128%23 Jul
office10–130.0919%23 Jul
office10–130.0825%22 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0131%21 Jul
office13–110.1130%20 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0412%20 Jul
inferno13–60.1118%19 Jul
office13–60.1213%19 Jul
overpass13–100.0417%19 Jul
nuke13–40.1113%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0221%16 Jul
train13–9-0.0315%15 Jul
anubis13–110.1019%15 Jul
office12–12-0.0017%15 Jul
nuke6–130.0410%15 Jul
inferno2–130.0213%15 Jul
dust212–120.0116%15 Jul
cache12–12-0.0114%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0815%14 Jul
inferno13–70.0517%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.0316%13 Jul
train9–130.0419%13 Jul
dust211–130.1017%12 Jul
inferno6–9-0.115%12 Jul
office11–13-0.0242%12 Jul
overpass9–50.086%12 Jul
office5–130.0141%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0521%11 Jul
train13–9-0.0230%11 Jul
office13–9-0.0127%11 Jul
office12–120.1723%11 Jul
cache13–9-0.0110%10 Jul
mirage13–70.0422%10 Jul
train13–6-0.0123%10 Jul
ancient2–13-0.029%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →