Piparfugl

Piparfugl — CS2 Stats

IS76561198032398726[U:1:72132998]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,563Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,175Pink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPiparfuglFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,175 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning63
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateWLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 450ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time505ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 30 Aug →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 13 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 31 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 41% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC229–1341%-0.00
anubisC188–1044%0.02
ancientC167–944%0.01
infernoA149–564%0.01
dust2A148–657%0.01
nukeS128–467%0.03
cache—30–30%-0.00
office—10–10%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

578Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
84.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3247%1.1216.1
Ancient2737%1.1216.0
Inferno2462%1.2915.2
Dust22339%0.8613.6
Anubis2361%1.3118.0
Nuke2157%1.1717.6
Vertigo757%1.2316.0
Cache633%1.3615.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
499msReaction time
50.2%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
13.92HE damage / grenade
8.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0417%14 Nov →
mirage6–130.0623%14 Nov →
nuke9–130.0029%14 Nov →
anubis14–160.0416%14 Nov →
inferno13–30.0554%13 Nov →
nuke13–40.099%13 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0036%13 Nov →
dust211–130.0021%12 Nov →
mirage10–130.0115%12 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.119%10 Nov →
ancient3–110.0433%5 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0420%1 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0925%1 Nov →
anubis10–130.0112%29 Oct →
anubis11–130.0118%29 Oct →
mirage13–100.0624%28 Oct →
anubis13–70.0614%28 Oct →
mirage10–130.0515%21 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0910%20 Oct →
mirage13–00.1424%13 Oct →
ancient3–130.0117%10 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0324%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0224%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0613%23 Sept →
ancient13–90.0715%23 Sept →
inferno11–130.0635%22 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0224%22 Sept →
anubis7–130.1226%22 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0120%19 Sept →
inferno13–60.0625%19 Sept →
ancient13–80.0522%19 Sept →
anubis13–70.0310%19 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0325%18 Sept →
nuke9–130.0124%17 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0314%17 Sept →
mirage6–130.0420%16 Sept →
nuke13–90.0429%16 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.1212%16 Sept →
cache10–130.0224%12 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0123%10 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0422%9 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0011%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.0417%8 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0021%8 Sept →
ancient9–130.0632%7 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0119%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.0515%6 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0817%5 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0117%5 Sept →
anubis13–30.0715%4 Sept →
mirage10–130.0016%4 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0413%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0724%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0117%3 Sept →
anubis9–130.0216%3 Sept →
nuke5–130.038%3 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0113%3 Sept →
mirage13–100.0222%3 Sept →
office12–120.0917%2 Sept →
ancient11–130.0025%2 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0014%2 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0810%2 Sept →
dust215–150.0915%31 Aug →
ancient13–90.0115%31 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0616%30 Aug →
nuke13–20.1921%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.016%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.1114%30 Aug →
nuke13–80.0617%29 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0127%29 Aug →
ancient13–30.0914%29 Aug →
anubis15–150.0116%28 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0113%28 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.0117%27 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0333%25 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0126%24 Aug →
mirage13–60.0816%22 Aug →
dust213–80.0421%20 Aug →
nuke13–110.0315%19 Aug →
dust213–80.0218%19 Aug →
dust213–50.088%18 Aug →
nuke13–00.0619%18 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0213%18 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0116%17 Aug →
nuke13–50.0412%17 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0512%17 Aug →
inferno13–50.0513%17 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0216%17 Aug →
dust213–80.0224%10 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0711%9 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0424%9 Aug →
mirage13–110.0120%6 Aug →
ancient15–150.079%6 Aug →
dust213–60.0315%6 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0033%5 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0015%5 Aug →
ancient13–70.0320%5 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0723%5 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.029%5 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0410%4 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.