Masi

Masi — CS2 Stats

FI76561198031626976[U:1:71361248]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,655Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,537Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,833Top 25% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43624 of 251285 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,655 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,833 -2,694 22 Feb – 24 Sept · 15 days played
22,59427,198peak 27,19822 Feb24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,286 +0 30 Aug – 24 Sept · 2 observations
2,2862,286peak 2,28630 Aug24 Sept
27,304Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,286Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-01-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,286
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 214 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,365 below peak (27,198)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,153 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,167 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 12 Oct 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate40.3%46.9%49.2%8.9% short
Shot accuracy16.5%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.081.120.03 short
Match win rate57.9%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMasiPREMIER22,833 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,286csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning55
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–56–1Last 10043%Win rateLWWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 699ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.5
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time597ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 7 Mar →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · anubis, 11 Apr →
406msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 30 Mar →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 4 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 24% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2811–1739%-0.02
anubisD256–1924%-0.02
nukeA2012–860%-0.01
overpassA106–460%0.00
infernoS64–267%-0.02
cacheC52–340%-0.02
mirage—41–325%-0.01
train—11–0100%0.07
poseidon—10–10%-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

135,103Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
9,520Matches
57.9%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band
40.3%Headshot %
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band
16,165MVPs
2,537Hours (in match)
5,710Bombs planted
1,495Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,015
AWP12,141
P2503,436
FAMAS2,694
SG 5532,640

Lifetime map wins

8,807nuke
4,085dust2
3,964inferno
3,843train
2,790cbble
1,303vertigo
162office
149lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

853Matches
54%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
78.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient14059%1.0216.0
Anubis13849%1.0115.3
Nuke8666%1.0115.2
Mirage4450%0.9915.3
Overpass4154%0.9214.3
Dust22357%1.0514.4
Inferno2060%0.8213.3
Train2060%0.9616.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
605msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.91HE damage / grenade
9.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2268% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6209% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0318%26 Jul →
nuke13–40.0413%26 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0326%23 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0315%23 Jul →
cache13–60.0115%23 Jul →
cache12–16-0.0518%23 Jul →
inferno13–80.006%22 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0320%22 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.018%22 Jul →
anubis13–1-0.0419%21 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0215%21 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0017%21 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0716%21 Jul →
nuke13–70.005%21 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0420%9 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0521%9 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.060%9 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0216%9 Jul →
nuke13–50.0216%9 Jul →
ancient13–100.0311%9 Jul →
cache13–30.068%9 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.058%9 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0222%9 Jul →
ancient13–10.066%2 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.086%2 Jul →
overpass13–60.0712%2 Jul →
anubis10–130.0722%24 Jun →
mirage8–130.0020%15 Jun →
ancient13–5-0.014%15 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0813%15 Jun →
anubis7–130.0120%15 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.1210%15 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0627%27 May →
ancient5–13-0.0718%27 May →
ancient5–13-0.0424%26 May →
ancient4–13-0.0517%26 May →
anubis13–30.0823%26 May →
ancient10–130.0114%25 May →
mirage13–80.0619%25 May →
anubis11–130.0114%25 May →
nuke13–6-0.0416%18 Apr →
inferno13–2-0.0030%18 Apr →
train13–60.0726%18 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0011%14 Apr →
overpass3–130.0311%14 Apr →
ancient14–16-0.0210%13 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0126%13 Apr →
nuke16–130.0216%12 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0526%12 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0711%12 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0124%11 Apr →
anubis9–130.0240%11 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0217%11 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0518%11 Apr →
overpass17–19-0.0212%11 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0619%11 Apr →
ancient25–220.0310%11 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0212%11 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0216%10 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.039%10 Apr →
inferno13–4-0.0311%1 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0317%1 Apr →
nuke13–50.0528%1 Apr →
ancient16–130.0013%31 Mar →
anubis17–19-0.0113%31 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0216%30 Mar →
nuke13–16-0.0318%30 Mar →
anubis2–13-0.0521%30 Mar →
overpass13–90.0437%30 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0718%23 Mar →
anubis0–13-0.080%8 Mar →
poseidon1–9-0.1610%7 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.1012%7 Mar →
anubis13–90.0314%7 Mar →
ancient13–50.1016%7 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0810%4 Mar →
ancient2–13-0.116%4 Mar →
nuke13–00.0910%4 Mar →
ancient16–13-0.0113%25 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0220%25 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0518%25 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.074%22 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0729%22 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0613%21 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0125%21 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0322%21 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0816%10 Feb →
overpass13–40.0317%10 Feb →
anubis13–6-0.0412%5 Feb →
ancient13–80.0113%5 Feb →
nuke8–130.0617%5 Feb →
anubis15–15-0.0414%4 Feb →
ancient11–130.0315%4 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0214%2 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.047%2 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0215%2 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.048%28 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0316%28 Jan →
ancient16–12-0.0219%28 Jan →
nuke13–10.0028%28 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.