๐๐ซ๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก๐ž๐ซ

๐๐ซ๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก๐ž๐ซ โ€” CS2 Stats

AQ76561198029460387[U:1:69194659]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

581Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,270Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,611Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band ยท top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14330 of 220704 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then โ€” still 581 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 26 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,611 +2,977 3 May โ€“ 16 Sept ยท 17 days played
22,63426,825peak 26,8253 May16 Sept
26,825Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-01-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,214 below peak (26,825)
  • -108 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 โ€” 4,389 to go
  • Reached: Red band ยท Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate63.2%43.8%44.9%above
Shot accuracy1.0%12.0%12.4%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.801.021.04above
Match win rate33.4%44.7%45.3%11.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐๐ซ๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก๐ž๐ซFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER25,611 ยท Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility65

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47โ€“47โ€“6Last 10047%Win rateLWLWWLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.02 avg rating ยท โˆ’3.5pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’1ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 4โ€“5โ€“1 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 10โ€“9โ€“1 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points โ€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00โˆ’0.01
first โ…“ avg 0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.00
Reaction time586ms+3ms
first โ…“ avg 583ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+0.4%
first โ…“ avg 16.3% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating ยท 9โ€“4 ยท inferno, 29 Mar โ†’
53%Best headshot accuracy ยท 7โ€“9 ยท poseidon, 21 May โ†’
438msFastest reaction time ยท 5โ€“13 ยท dust2, 12 Jun โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท anubis, 30 May โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4โ€“5In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map ยท 78% over 9overpassWeakest map ยท 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B158โ€“753%-0.01
poseidonA138โ€“562%-0.02
vertigoC125โ€“742%0.01
anubisA95โ€“456%0.02
mirageS97โ€“278%-0.01
infernoD93โ€“633%0.00
trainC83โ€“538%0.02
overpassD61โ€“517%-0.01
nukeD61โ€“517%-0.01
officeC52โ€“340%0.03
cacheโ€”43โ€“175%0.00
ancientโ€”21โ€“150%-0.02
sanctumโ€”20โ€“20%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

185,019Lifetime kills
1.80K/D ยท Top 5% of Level 5 players
2,653Matches
33.4%Match win rate
63.2%Headshot % ยท Top 5% of Level 5 players
1.0%Shot accuracy
10,300MVPs
6,945Hours (in match)
1,644Bombs planted
3,012Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4799,419
AWP12,320
FAMAS3,717
MP92,113

Lifetime map wins

4,175dust2
2,721inferno
1,967vertigo
1,791nuke
888train
259italy
234office
33ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches
64%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
91.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1464%1.1216.1
Dust2967%1.2816.8
Inferno6100%1.7823.5
Ancient60%1.0516.3
Nuke3100%1.2817.3
Anubis250%0.7615.5
Train1100%2.4422.0
Vertigo1100%1.008.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
9.9ยฐPreaim
579msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
11.63HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4888% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy โ†’Overpass grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo6โ€“13-0.0111%4 Aug โ†’
vertigo13โ€“80.0322%29 Jul โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0117%28 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0519%7 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“7-0.0612%6 Jul โ†’
mirage2โ€“13-0.129%29 Jun โ†’
poseidon2โ€“9-0.1013%24 Jun โ†’
overpass13โ€“11-0.0118%22 Jun โ†’
nuke14โ€“16-0.0410%21 Jun โ†’
train12โ€“120.0319%21 Jun โ†’
train13โ€“100.067%21 Jun โ†’
poseidon9โ€“70.1332%13 Jun โ†’
poseidon9โ€“5-0.0425%13 Jun โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.0017%13 Jun โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0127%13 Jun โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0316%13 Jun โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0414%12 Jun โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.0718%12 Jun โ†’
dust216โ€“130.0317%12 Jun โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0012%12 Jun โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0018%9 Jun โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0723%9 Jun โ†’
vertigo9โ€“130.0210%7 Jun โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0620%7 Jun โ†’
vertigo9โ€“13-0.0113%7 Jun โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0214%31 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“4-0.037%31 May โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0736%31 May โ†’
sanctum8โ€“80.0310%30 May โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0321%30 May โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0114%30 May โ†’
anubis13โ€“10.1118%30 May โ†’
anubis6โ€“130.0316%27 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.0015%25 May โ†’
overpass2โ€“13-0.0622%25 May โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.0923%25 May โ†’
dust213โ€“4-0.0520%24 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0114%24 May โ†’
anubis13โ€“7-0.0417%23 May โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0015%23 May โ†’
dust23โ€“13-0.0031%23 May โ†’
poseidon9โ€“6-0.0816%21 May โ†’
poseidon0โ€“9-0.310%21 May โ†’
poseidon7โ€“9-0.0953%21 May โ†’
poseidon9โ€“50.1519%17 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0411%17 May โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0024%16 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“10.0918%15 May โ†’
anubis10โ€“130.0325%15 May โ†’
office13โ€“70.1018%13 May โ†’
office6โ€“13-0.0115%13 May โ†’
cache12โ€“120.0213%7 May โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0020%6 May โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0223%3 May โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0417%3 May โ†’
poseidon8โ€“8-0.0414%3 May โ†’
poseidon9โ€“3-0.0721%3 May โ†’
poseidon9โ€“30.0622%2 May โ†’
train13โ€“50.1124%26 Apr โ†’
train3โ€“130.0321%26 Apr โ†’
train13โ€“20.0817%26 Apr โ†’
vertigo13โ€“110.0824%10 Apr โ†’
vertigo13โ€“50.015%9 Apr โ†’
vertigo4โ€“130.0021%9 Apr โ†’
poseidon9โ€“1-0.0414%6 Apr โ†’
inferno6โ€“9-0.109%6 Apr โ†’
anubis9โ€“5-0.0110%3 Apr โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0213%2 Apr โ†’
poseidon9โ€“10.1715%29 Mar โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.1819%29 Mar โ†’
overpass3โ€“9-0.0713%29 Mar โ†’
vertigo9โ€“6-0.0319%29 Mar โ†’
vertigo0โ€“9-0.2225%29 Mar โ†’
sanctum5โ€“9-0.0523%26 Mar โ†’
nuke5โ€“9-0.0125%26 Mar โ†’
vertigo8โ€“80.0821%26 Mar โ†’
poseidon4โ€“90.0023%26 Mar โ†’
inferno5โ€“90.1113%26 Mar โ†’
overpass5โ€“9-0.0113%26 Mar โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.028%25 Mar โ†’
office8โ€“130.0221%18 Mar โ†’
office13โ€“80.0520%18 Mar โ†’
office3โ€“130.0124%18 Mar โ†’
overpass6โ€“130.0727%12 Mar โ†’
overpass12โ€“120.0522%11 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“10.0820%7 Mar โ†’
train9โ€“13-0.0013%28 Feb โ†’
train11โ€“13-0.0731%28 Feb โ†’
train3โ€“13-0.049%28 Feb โ†’
vertigo10โ€“13-0.0111%11 Feb โ†’
vertigo13โ€“20.1111%11 Feb โ†’
anubis13โ€“4-0.0011%4 Feb โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0513%4 Feb โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0217%30 Jan โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.049%27 Jan โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0211%27 Jan โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.078%27 Jan โ†’
dust21โ€“13-0.0115%27 Jan โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0612%27 Jan โ†’
nuke5โ€“130.016%26 Jan โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’