Marvos — CS2 Stats

76561198028913986[U:1:68648258]

2,425Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,107Pink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10605 of 25920 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMarvosFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,107 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning57
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWLLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2
Aggression7.9
Utility6.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time582ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — anubis 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
11Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB22111150%0.00
infernoB21111052%0.01
cacheA2011955%0.02
anubisD1751229%0.02
mirageS64267%0.03
overpass41325%0.02
dust231233%0.02
nuke32167%0.02
train21150%0.02
office110100%-0.06
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

439Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
108.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis20%1.3928.0
Inferno250%1.6618.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
582msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
10.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4096% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.1221%25 Aug
anubis11–13-0.059%25 Aug
inferno3–130.0220%25 Aug
ancient13–90.0310%25 Aug
inferno16–140.0412%24 Aug
anubis11–130.0117%24 Aug
cache13–5-0.0120%24 Aug
cache10–130.0522%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0724%23 Aug
anubis9–130.0420%23 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0321%18 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0516%18 Aug
anubis16–120.0517%18 Aug
inferno8–130.0315%18 Aug
dust213–160.0815%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0216%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0315%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.059%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0513%15 Aug
cache13–16-0.0214%14 Aug
anubis13–160.0314%14 Aug
inferno14–160.0017%14 Aug
cache13–16-0.0118%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0510%9 Aug
cache13–50.0212%6 Aug
ancient16–130.0416%6 Aug
dust215–15-0.0315%2 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0315%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0218%2 Aug
cache13–100.0013%2 Aug
ancient9–130.0512%2 Aug
cache13–10.0129%2 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0125%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0416%30 Jul
ancient13–100.0512%30 Jul
cache13–20.0811%30 Jul
cache15–15-0.0211%26 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0312%26 Jul
inferno13–60.0315%26 Jul
anubis13–90.1125%19 Jul
cache11–130.0011%19 Jul
inferno9–130.0224%19 Jul
ancient8–130.0015%17 Jul
cache11–130.0623%17 Jul
anubis14–160.057%17 Jul
cache13–100.0113%17 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0811%16 Jul
mirage13–60.1123%16 Jul
inferno11–130.0821%16 Jul
ancient13–10-0.046%16 Jul
cache8–13-0.0213%16 Jul
ancient11–130.0115%15 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0324%15 Jul
inferno13–100.0414%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0618%14 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0124%14 Jul
inferno13–110.0219%14 Jul
cache13–100.0219%14 Jul
cache13–80.0717%13 Jul
ancient5–130.0020%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0112%13 Jul
ancient13–11-0.034%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0713%13 Jul
cache16–140.0114%9 Jul
inferno8–130.0423%9 Jul
train8–130.029%8 Jul
ancient13–30.0813%8 Jul
mirage13–50.128%8 Jul
office13–11-0.068%8 Jul
vertigo13–110.0124%6 Jul
train13–40.0110%6 Jul
cache13–40.1015%6 Jul
mirage15–15-0.027%5 Jul
ancient5–130.0313%4 Jul
inferno5–130.0326%4 Jul
overpass11–130.0116%4 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0311%4 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0213%4 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0421%4 Jul
anubis13–90.0517%3 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0131%3 Jul
dust213–80.0117%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0410%3 Jul
overpass13–50.078%3 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0314%3 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0213%3 Jul
anubis13–70.0128%3 Jul
mirage13–7-0.013%3 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0212%3 Jul
ancient16–140.0417%3 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0111%1 Jul
nuke13–90.0316%1 Jul
anubis7–130.0426%1 Jul
ancient4–130.0714%1 Jul
overpass14–16-0.0115%30 Jun
ancient2–13-0.054%28 Jun
anubis13–10.2414%28 Jun
overpass9–130.0114%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0415%28 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0410%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →