mills

mills — CS2 Stats

US76561198027132252[U:1:66866524]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,729Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,342 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,729 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 8 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,497 +975 11 Mar5 Jun · 8 days played
24,52227,034peak 27,03411 Mar5 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,342 +0 1 Sept23 Sept · 5 observations
2,3422,342peak 2,3421 Sept23 Sept
27,034Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,342Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-03-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,342
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 158 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmillsFACEITLevel 10 · 2,342 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,342csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning61
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63361Last 10063%Win rateLLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −76ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time513ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 20 Apr
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 13 Mar
359msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · ancient, 29 May
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 29 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 16nukeWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.01
ancientS2417771%0.03
dust2S1612475%0.02
anubisS1611569%-0.01
nukeC94544%0.04
overpass43175%0.00
inferno31233%0.10
cache21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

834Matches
54%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
88.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient15759%1.3817.2
Anubis12160%1.3417.2
Mirage11251%1.2217.9
Nuke5454%1.3617.1
Dust25143%1.2619.3
Inferno4038%1.3818.4
Vertigo2650%1.2916.8
Overpass1323%1.0515.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
516msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
12.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–13-0.0118%15 Sept
mirage13–160.0117%15 Sept
nuke11–130.0113%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.0322%22 Aug
ancient13–20.0525%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0423%13 Aug
dust213–60.0224%9 Aug
dust213–70.0317%3 Aug
mirage7–130.0119%1 Aug
dust213–90.0223%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0422%28 Jul
ancient13–100.1223%27 Jul
nuke13–60.1520%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0518%26 Jul
ancient13–30.1118%26 Jul
mirage13–30.0627%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0114%20 Jul
cache14–160.0210%12 Jul
inferno9–130.0531%12 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0515%29 Jun
overpass13–50.0427%9 Jun
ancient13–50.0416%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0424%5 Jun
ancient13–100.0720%5 Jun
ancient4–13-0.087%4 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0514%4 Jun
mirage13–110.0318%4 Jun
mirage15–150.0017%1 Jun
dust23–13-0.028%31 May
ancient13–10.0510%29 May
nuke8–13-0.0122%29 May
anubis11–13-0.0725%28 May
ancient10–13-0.0111%22 May
mirage9–13-0.058%22 May
dust24–13-0.0415%19 May
cache13–70.0115%17 May
anubis13–80.0218%17 May
ancient13–9-0.0417%17 May
mirage11–13-0.0216%17 May
anubis13–16-0.0214%16 May
anubis14–160.038%16 May
ancient13–9-0.027%14 May
anubis14–16-0.0317%14 May
mirage13–110.0417%14 May
ancient6–130.0216%14 May
anubis6–13-0.0618%13 May
dust213–100.0123%13 May
ancient13–50.0316%13 May
mirage6–130.0514%12 May
mirage0–10.000%12 May
ancient13–10-0.0120%12 May
ancient13–40.0729%7 May
dust213–9-0.0115%29 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0018%28 Apr
dust214–16-0.0115%26 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0116%25 Apr
dust213–11-0.0710%25 Apr
ancient10–130.0614%24 Apr
mirage13–70.0419%23 Apr
inferno9–20.2635%20 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0118%15 Apr
mirage13–30.0322%14 Apr
anubis13–10.0113%13 Apr
dust213–90.1430%11 Apr
ancient5–130.0214%11 Apr
dust213–60.0224%10 Apr
anubis13–2-0.066%10 Apr
ancient4–13-0.057%9 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0422%9 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0215%9 Apr
mirage13–7-0.025%9 Apr
ancient13–50.0123%8 Apr
nuke13–10.0428%8 Apr
anubis13–110.0115%7 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0216%7 Apr
mirage13–20.0526%6 Apr
dust213–5-0.0122%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0321%6 Apr
mirage13–30.0420%6 Apr
dust213–60.0927%6 Apr
ancient13–50.0515%3 Apr
mirage13–7-0.1118%3 Apr
ancient13–60.0918%3 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0221%31 Mar
dust217–190.0429%30 Mar
ancient13–70.0420%23 Mar
anubis13–10-0.029%20 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0224%17 Mar
ancient5–130.0619%13 Mar
mirage5–130.0217%13 Mar
nuke13–70.1542%13 Mar
mirage13–80.017%11 Mar
dust213–60.1325%11 Mar
mirage13–20.0842%11 Mar
anubis13–90.0814%10 Mar
ancient19–16-0.0411%9 Mar
overpass2–13-0.1318%9 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0217%8 Mar
overpass13–20.1212%8 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0215%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →