Le_Rot

Le_Rot — CS2 Stats

DE76561198026891124[U:1:66625396]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,027Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,457Top 10% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10182 of 259603 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,028 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,457 +937 31 Aug – 30 Oct · 9 days played
25,00026,457peak 26,45731 Aug30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,028 +0 2 Sept – 23 Sept · 3 observations
2,0282,028peak 2,0282 Sept23 Sept
26,457Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,028Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,028
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 472 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,457
  • +1,457 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,543 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLe_RotFACEITLevel 10 · 2,028 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,457 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,028csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning48
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateLLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time507ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 500ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 6–2 · rush_001, 30 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 12 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · rush_001, 30 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 24anubisWeakest map · 50% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2613–1350%-0.01
ancientS2416–867%0.01
infernoA2314–961%-0.01
cacheB147–750%0.01
mirageS64–267%-0.01
rush_001A53–260%0.04
fachwerk—11–0100%0.06
dust2—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,561Matches
51%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
72.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis18248%0.9815.0
Inferno17853%0.9914.3
Ancient13751%0.9414.0
Mirage10042%0.8913.2
Overpass6659%1.0815.4
Cache3047%0.9113.0
Nuke2756%1.1114.8
Dust22635%0.9713.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
63.7%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
499msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
30.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
8.06HE damage / grenade
7.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4568 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3715% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
rush_0014–8-0.0520%30 Oct →
rush_0017–8-0.079%30 Oct →
rush_0016–20.1233%30 Oct →
rush_0016–20.1829%30 Oct →
rush_0016–20.0232%30 Oct →
inferno13–50.0424%30 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0021%28 Oct →
anubis14–160.0113%28 Oct →
ancient13–70.1032%28 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0025%28 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0016%26 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0022%26 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0213%26 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0920%19 Oct →
anubis13–90.0328%19 Oct →
inferno18–22-0.0317%19 Oct →
anubis13–100.0119%19 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0213%19 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0111%14 Oct →
inferno13–90.0215%14 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0111%14 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0318%14 Oct →
ancient13–80.0116%14 Oct →
cache11–130.0120%14 Oct →
mirage13–80.0124%12 Oct →
ancient13–20.0826%12 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0025%12 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0116%12 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0219%12 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0020%11 Oct →
anubis20–22-0.077%6 Oct →
cache13–110.0623%6 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0517%6 Oct →
ancient13–20.0614%5 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.1114%5 Oct →
cache8–130.038%5 Oct →
anubis13–80.0117%5 Oct →
anubis13–40.0221%5 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0420%1 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0216%28 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.077%28 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0024%28 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0115%28 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0716%28 Sept →
anubis11–130.0117%28 Sept →
ancient9–130.0120%28 Sept →
inferno13–110.0022%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0324%22 Sept →
cache13–30.0522%22 Sept →
inferno12–120.0520%20 Sept →
fachwerk13–80.0621%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0315%20 Sept →
ancient14–160.0619%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.1315%19 Sept →
anubis16–140.0512%19 Sept →
cache13–60.0818%18 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0416%16 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0118%16 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0121%16 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0325%16 Sept →
inferno12–120.0916%15 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0125%14 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0830%14 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0327%14 Sept →
ancient1–70.0314%14 Sept →
inferno19–16-0.0313%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0527%13 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0515%13 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0917%13 Sept →
inferno13–100.0211%13 Sept →
anubis8–130.0115%12 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0335%12 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0710%12 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0316%11 Sept →
ancient13–30.0224%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0514%11 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0119%11 Sept →
anubis17–190.0118%7 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0219%7 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0124%7 Sept →
cache13–70.0511%5 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0118%2 Sept →
anubis14–160.0115%31 Aug →
ancient13–70.0216%31 Aug →
anubis13–00.0917%31 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0321%31 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.026%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.099%26 Aug →
inferno13–110.0322%26 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0117%26 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0618%26 Aug →
ancient13–50.0010%24 Aug →
ancient13–100.0318%24 Aug →
mirage13–80.0024%24 Aug →
ancient13–40.0414%24 Aug →
cache3–130.0222%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0120%19 Aug →
inferno16–130.0115%19 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0111%19 Aug →
inferno13–30.0325%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.