Heli^A<3 — CS2 Stats

76561198026759310[U:1:66493582]

3,850Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

8,546Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,153Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1395 of 13747 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,445 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,153Peak Premier on CSDB

2,445Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,445
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 55 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 26,153
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,847 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	45.5%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	16.4%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.21	1.08
Match win rate	47.9%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning51

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression6.4

Utility5.7

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.1

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time514ms−3ms

first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms

Headshot accuracy23.1%+4.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–2

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 18cacheWeakest map · 39% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	18	7–11	39%	0.01
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	0.00
mirage	A	16	9–7	56%	0.00
anubis	A	16	9–7	56%	0.00
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
dust2	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	0.02
eldorado	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

346,778Lifetime kills

1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

11,413Matches

47.9%Match win rate

45.5%Headshot %

16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players

39,135MVPs

7,986Hours (in match)

11,662Bombs planted

4,520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47108,745

AWP63,796

M4A4 / M4A1-S57,948

P2000 / USP-S28,741

Desert Eagle20,805

Glock-189,813

P2508,398

Tec-95,600

FAMAS4,363

Five-SeveN3,956

Lifetime map wins

21,151dust2

17,282inferno

9,425nuke

5,385train

3,509cbble

3,068vertigo

425office

141aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,024Matches

54%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

79.9ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	192	57%	0.97	14.3
Anubis	138	52%	1.07	15.2
Ancient	134	54%	1.07	16.0
Mirage	116	43%	0.97	15.5
Nuke	51	57%	1.18	16.1
Inferno	33	48%	1.11	15.6
Cache	23	48%	0.99	14.1
Overpass	22	50%	1.06	18.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy

40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.3%Spray accuracy

84.4%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

518msReaction time

28.8%T opening success

47.5%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

6.87HE damage / grenade

9.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.7903% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	16–14	0.09	18%	27 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	22%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.07	8%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	21%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.03	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	100%	27 Aug →
ancient	1–3	-0.02	0%	27 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	40%	26 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	36%	26 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	27%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.00	23%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	24%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	21%	25 Aug →
cache	1–6	0.06	24%	25 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.11	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	25%	25 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.08	26%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	15%	25 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.02	10%	24 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	33%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	21%	24 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.09	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	33%	24 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	21%	24 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	13%	24 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	14%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	14%	23 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.00	22%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.12	22%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.05	18%	22 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	31%	22 Aug →
mirage	15–19	-0.01	10%	21 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.05	24%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	29%	21 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	33%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.10	22%	20 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	33%	20 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	20%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	30%	18 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.02	22%	18 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	12%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.00	13%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	23%	18 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	15%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	18%	18 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	10%	17 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	11%	17 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	57%	17 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	22%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	19%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.10	18%	16 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.07	28%	16 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
eldorado	9–7	0.07	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.00	42%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.09	30%	14 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.03	50%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.10	31%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	11%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	5%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	35%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	14 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	26%	14 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	12%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	16%	14 Aug →
train	1–3	-0.09	0%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	22%	13 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	25%	13 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	22%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.06	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	13%	13 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	20%	13 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.06	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	13%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.11	20%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	21%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	20%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	19%	10 Aug →
anubis	3–11	0.06	23%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.16	26%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.10	20%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	21%	10 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	19%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	18%	10 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	24%	10 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	22%	9 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	14%	9 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.03	21%	9 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	19%	9 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.06	21%	8 Aug →