CurtainsCall

CurtainsCall — CS2 Stats

DE76561198023473004[U:1:63207276]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,222Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,683Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54992 of 232712 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,687 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 26 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,683 +1,684 29 May15 Sept · 12 days played
19,99923,031peak 23,03129 May15 Sept
23,383Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,687Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-05-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,687
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 64 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,348 below peak (23,031)
  • +88 over 30 days · steady
  • -614 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,317 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCurtainsCallFACEITLevel 9 · 1,687 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,683 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,687csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning51
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateWLWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −95ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time541ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 29 May
31%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 1 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
1212In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA24141058%-0.00
dust2A2213959%0.00
nukeB168850%0.01
ancientB157847%-0.00
cacheA74357%-0.03
overpassS64267%0.02
anubis32167%0.02
mirage21150%0.02
vertigo21150%0.09
sanctum1010%-0.06
poseidon1010%0.00
office1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

319Matches
56%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27265%1.1315.1
Ancient5157%1.1515.9
Inferno3253%1.0214.6
Nuke2343%1.0115.9
Anubis2245%1.1816.4
Overpass1963%1.2017.3
Mirage1560%1.1914.1
Cache1457%0.9412.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
525msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.75HE damage / grenade
8.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6624% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0219%18 Sept
nuke8–130.0114%15 Sept
ancient13–110.0913%10 Sept
dust213–10-0.0021%10 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0214%6 Sept
nuke7–130.0122%3 Sept
nuke5–130.0122%3 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0016%3 Sept
dust24–13-0.0831%1 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0413%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0116%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0512%25 Aug
nuke11–130.0015%25 Aug
nuke5–20.0318%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0812%24 Aug
nuke13–110.0823%20 Aug
dust213–16-0.059%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.027%20 Aug
cache13–8-0.0223%18 Aug
ancient13–80.0311%18 Aug
inferno7–130.0417%18 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0617%13 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0014%13 Aug
inferno16–120.0617%13 Aug
dust213–16-0.0317%11 Aug
dust213–90.0315%11 Aug
anubis13–30.0417%6 Aug
dust24–13-0.0222%6 Aug
cache13–100.0028%6 Aug
dust211–130.0411%6 Aug
nuke13–11-0.048%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0615%4 Aug
dust216–120.0121%4 Aug
inferno11–130.027%4 Aug
inferno13–90.0216%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0512%30 Jul
dust213–10.0212%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0916%30 Jul
cache9–130.0215%28 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0019%28 Jul
dust213–90.0122%26 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0310%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0022%26 Jul
inferno13–10-0.018%26 Jul
ancient8–130.0110%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0014%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0521%21 Jul
dust28–130.018%21 Jul
nuke10–130.027%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.0317%19 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0417%19 Jul
dust216–120.0222%16 Jul
dust213–8-0.0110%16 Jul
cache13–8-0.0514%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0119%14 Jul
dust213–100.067%7 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0818%7 Jul
cache9–13-0.0831%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0213%2 Jul
inferno16–130.0716%2 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0527%30 Jun
ancient10–13-0.006%30 Jun
overpass13–110.0411%30 Jun
overpass13–10.1219%29 Jun
inferno5–130.0019%29 Jun
sanctum7–9-0.0623%25 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0314%25 Jun
inferno9–40.0613%25 Jun
nuke13–110.0510%23 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0117%23 Jun
inferno9–60.0121%19 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0111%19 Jun
poseidon8–80.0011%19 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0416%18 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0316%18 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0020%18 Jun
dust27–130.0026%18 Jun
office3–13-0.1017%18 Jun
dust211–13-0.0815%16 Jun
ancient13–60.0316%16 Jun
dust213–10-0.0120%16 Jun
inferno13–70.0218%16 Jun
overpass13–110.0315%2 Jun
dust213–90.0710%2 Jun
cache13–11-0.0311%1 Jun
dust26–13-0.0417%1 Jun
mirage13–90.0110%30 May
anubis13–70.0311%30 May
mirage11–130.0313%29 May
inferno16–13-0.0323%29 May
overpass3–13-0.079%29 May
inferno9–70.0225%29 May
vertigo5–9-0.0122%29 May
vertigo9–30.1921%29 May
inferno13–50.0610%28 May
dust213–100.0520%28 May
overpass13–90.0516%28 May
dust213–100.0014%27 May
dust216–140.0215%26 May
inferno13–11-0.0116%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →