Gaute

Gaute — CS2 Stats

76561198023152849[U:1:62887121]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,271Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,574Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,161Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGauteFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,161csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning52
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–38–2Last 10060%Win rateWWLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 440ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 451ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility7.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.2
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time453ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 453ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 24 Jul →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 23 Jul →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 5 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 27anubisWeakest map · 47% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2719–870%0.01
nukeS2114–767%0.01
anubisB199–1047%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.02
ancientA95–456%0.03
vertigo—42–250%-0.01
mirage—31–233%0.00
train—10–10%-0.07
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.01
shelter—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,212Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5062%1.2016.8
Nuke3863%1.1415.9
Anubis2458%1.1016.3
Cache2045%1.1215.2
Ancient1644%1.1216.8
Vertigo1547%1.0115.5
Mirage1450%1.1016.1
Overpass956%1.2016.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
464msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.31HE damage / grenade
12.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2855% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0325%15 Sept →
anubis13–60.0213%15 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0220%14 Sept →
cache13–50.0611%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0418%14 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0320%14 Sept →
mirage8–130.0125%10 Sept →
anubis13–30.000%10 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0315%10 Sept →
inferno13–80.0514%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.0316%8 Sept →
nuke13–110.0322%8 Sept →
anubis8–130.0510%8 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0410%7 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.075%7 Sept →
inferno11–130.0311%7 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0216%6 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0122%6 Sept →
inferno25–230.0217%6 Sept →
nuke13–90.0118%6 Sept →
cache13–90.019%5 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0411%5 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0914%5 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0116%3 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0124%3 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0411%3 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0924%3 Sept →
nuke19–170.0215%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.0224%2 Sept →
inferno5–130.0015%2 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.016%2 Sept →
nuke13–20.0613%1 Sept →
nuke13–30.1212%1 Sept →
anubis13–110.006%1 Sept →
nuke13–70.0017%31 Aug →
nuke13–80.0329%31 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0212%31 Aug →
nuke13–80.0419%30 Aug →
inferno13–40.0825%30 Aug →
anubis8–130.0221%30 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.019%30 Aug →
nuke13–100.0316%30 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0219%23 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.058%23 Aug →
nuke8–130.0114%22 Aug →
vertigo13–8-0.0317%22 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0410%22 Aug →
inferno6–130.0111%20 Aug →
anubis13–50.097%20 Aug →
ancient7–130.0123%20 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0519%20 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.023%19 Aug →
nuke13–60.054%19 Aug →
nuke16–130.0910%19 Aug →
anubis9–130.019%18 Aug →
inferno16–19-0.045%18 Aug →
nuke13–110.0716%18 Aug →
ancient13–50.047%16 Aug →
inferno13–20.039%16 Aug →
cache13–70.0313%16 Aug →
inferno13–50.0510%16 Aug →
cache13–30.0611%16 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0210%16 Aug →
inferno13–70.0422%14 Aug →
train2–13-0.0723%14 Aug →
fachwerk13–8-0.0110%11 Aug →
inferno19–16-0.018%10 Aug →
vertigo15–19-0.0111%9 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0015%9 Aug →
anubis13–90.0314%9 Aug →
cache13–16-0.038%9 Aug →
ancient6–130.038%9 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0111%9 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0010%9 Aug →
anubis11–130.0521%9 Aug →
shelter13–60.0613%7 Aug →
ancient19–170.0416%7 Aug →
cache10–13-0.027%5 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0617%5 Aug →
ancient10–130.0121%5 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0118%5 Aug →
inferno16–140.0219%5 Aug →
anubis11–70.0527%30 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0226%30 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0313%30 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0612%30 Jul →
ancient13–80.0810%30 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.027%30 Jul →
cache13–20.0225%28 Jul →
ancient13–70.0321%28 Jul →
anubis15–150.0018%28 Jul →
cache12–160.0618%27 Jul →
ancient11–130.0815%27 Jul →
anubis15–150.0411%24 Jul →
inferno13–80.0814%24 Jul →
inferno8–130.0226%24 Jul →
nuke13–40.1017%24 Jul →
cache13–20.1326%24 Jul →
cache13–30.1230%23 Jul →
mirage13–70.037%23 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.