Pai Das Cabras

Pai Das Cabras — CS2 Stats

76561198021083097[U:1:60817369]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,399Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,249Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,525 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,525 → 1,525
+3Tracked matches · now 2,399
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 26 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,888 -3,217 26 Feb27 Jun · 15 days played
18,46823,105peak 23,10526 Feb27 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,525 +0 30 Aug12 Sept · 3 observations
1,5251,525peak 1,52530 Aug12 Sept
23,224Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,525Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,525
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 6 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches646−40
Win rate17%59%−42pp
K/D0.961.05−0.09
Headshot %59%51%+7pp

Measured 12 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.2%46.8%48.3%1.1% short
Shot accuracy11.2%13.0%13.2%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.061.070.17 short
Match win rate45.1%46.3%46.9%1.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPai Das CabrasFACEITLevel 8 · 1,525 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,525csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning49
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −84ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time631ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 13 May
47%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · anubis, 28 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 0–6 · stronghold, 26 Feb
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 13 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 74% over 19nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C24101442%-0.01
infernoS1914574%0.02
anubisA138562%-0.00
nukeD93633%-0.02
ancientD93633%-0.02
mirageC73443%-0.01
cacheB63350%-0.00
overpassS64267%-0.01
office31233%-0.05
sanctum1010%-0.04
poseidon1010%-0.01
italy1010%-0.03
stronghold1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

94,208Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
5,307Matches
45.1%Match win rate
47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11.2%Shot accuracy
10,594MVPs
2,240Hours (in match)
5,822Bombs planted
1,475Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,559
AWP8,771
MP93,599
MAC-103,088
FAMAS2,491

Lifetime map wins

14,581dust2
9,935inferno
3,432vertigo
2,816nuke
830train
254office
123cbble
29lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

769Matches
52%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
69.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214453%0.9113.9
Inferno13053%0.9613.4
Mirage12251%0.8512.2
Anubis10852%0.9715.1
Ancient5753%0.9714.7
Nuke4547%0.9713.7
Cache3361%1.1314.3
Vertigo3247%1.1816.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
632msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
8.52HE damage / grenade
13.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7242% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0019%8 Sept
cache13–40.0133%3 Sept
anubis13–30.1120%25 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0825%25 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0522%21 Aug
cache6–13-0.0219%17 Aug
inferno13–60.0631%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0144%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0110%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0619%9 Aug
inferno13–50.0430%25 Jul
inferno13–50.0217%24 Jul
cache13–80.0526%23 Jul
office13–5-0.0126%21 Jul
dust22–13-0.0132%21 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0111%21 Jul
cache3–13-0.029%21 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0120%16 Jul
office8–13-0.0813%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0330%12 Jul
dust22–13-0.0417%12 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0313%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0225%27 Jun
dust213–110.0336%26 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0017%26 Jun
anubis13–50.0230%26 Jun
anubis13–100.0816%26 Jun
dust216–130.0930%26 May
overpass8–8-0.0527%25 May
sanctum3–9-0.0426%25 May
nuke8–8-0.0120%25 May
poseidon5–9-0.0129%25 May
inferno9–30.1218%25 May
dust211–13-0.0429%24 May
inferno13–100.0529%18 May
anubis7–13-0.0931%18 May
ancient13–70.0428%18 May
cache11–13-0.0331%15 May
inferno8–13-0.0521%13 May
mirage5–13-0.0326%13 May
nuke13–20.2021%13 May
inferno16–14-0.0215%8 May
inferno13–4-0.0218%8 May
cache13–8-0.0122%6 May
dust27–130.0623%6 May
dust27–13-0.0640%4 May
overpass13–80.0619%29 Apr
dust213–60.0028%26 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0234%25 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0918%25 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0030%25 Apr
mirage13–50.0435%24 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0729%23 Apr
dust24–13-0.0518%22 Apr
dust211–13-0.0227%17 Apr
inferno6–130.1030%17 Apr
nuke2–13-0.1021%17 Apr
inferno8–130.039%10 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0021%10 Apr
inferno16–130.0316%10 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0610%8 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0718%8 Apr
inferno13–80.0218%8 Apr
overpass16–130.0125%8 Apr
dust213–7-0.0231%8 Apr
dust25–13-0.0146%8 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0332%6 Apr
anubis14–160.0230%6 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0338%4 Apr
dust213–70.0431%4 Apr
ancient0–13-0.1225%30 Mar
office7–13-0.0618%28 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0024%28 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0347%28 Mar
dust21–80.0321%28 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0331%26 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0113%26 Mar
italy11–13-0.0326%22 Mar
anubis13–80.0421%19 Mar
dust210–13-0.0311%18 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0719%17 Mar
dust213–10-0.0220%17 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0221%17 Mar
overpass13–2-0.0018%16 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0215%16 Mar
inferno8–130.0122%16 Mar
ancient16–120.0017%13 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0728%13 Mar
dust212–16-0.0414%13 Mar
dust213–40.0240%13 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0222%11 Mar
dust216–13-0.0025%11 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0129%6 Mar
mirage16–120.0422%6 Mar
ancient13–90.0422%5 Mar
dust213–9-0.0426%5 Mar
dust25–13-0.0519%26 Feb
stronghold0–6-0.1025%26 Feb
dust213–5-0.0314%26 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0010%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →