ReidL

ReidL — CS2 Stats

DK76561198021044893[U:1:60779165]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

358Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,076Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#62611 of 240126 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 17 Aug 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,193 +2,629 22 Apr26 Apr · 3 days played
18,56421,193peak 21,19322 Apr26 Apr
21,423Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2023-08-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,804), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate37.6%48.3%51.0%13.3% short
Shot accuracy21.5%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.071.090.04 short
Match win rate43.4%46.9%48.4%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGReidLFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning57
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4951Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time537ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 25 Apr
31%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 20 May
375msFastest reaction time · 8–16 · inferno, 27 Aug
16–2Biggest win · inferno, 26 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
46Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16ancientWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24131154%0.00
mirageC1761135%-0.01
nukeA1610663%-0.00
ancientD1641225%-0.01
overpassA1610663%0.00
anubis42250%-0.04
vertigo31233%-0.04
cache220100%0.01
dust221150%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,893Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
4,424Matches
43.4%Match win rate
37.6%Headshot %
21.5%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 9 players
10,612MVPs
2,076Hours (in match)
3,763Bombs planted
1,068Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,437
AWP11,335
FAMAS2,659
MAC-102,278
Knife1,583

Lifetime map wins

10,048inferno
5,450dust2
4,434nuke
3,620train
1,693cbble
638vertigo
128office
66safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,317Matches
52%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2361%1.0215.1
Inferno1694%1.2116.2
Dust21553%0.9814.5
Nuke1346%1.1515.4
Ancient1338%1.0017.1
Cache1173%1.5915.8
Overpass1050%1.1314.9
Anubis967%0.8013.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
43.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
543msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
15.49HE damage / grenade
1.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.8724 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4149% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0121%25 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0223%22 Aug
inferno13–50.0312%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0216%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0523%22 Aug
inferno13–30.0523%20 Aug
ancient11–130.0119%20 Aug
inferno13–20.1028%20 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0415%25 May
anubis8–130.0223%20 May
inferno9–13-0.0325%20 May
inferno11–130.0031%20 May
nuke10–13-0.0312%20 May
mirage16–19-0.0220%16 May
ancient6–13-0.087%16 May
ancient10–130.0212%10 May
inferno13–50.0321%10 May
inferno13–100.0413%6 May
mirage13–80.0323%3 May
overpass13–90.0413%2 May
nuke9–13-0.0415%2 May
overpass13–40.0916%1 May
anubis6–13-0.0612%1 May
cache13–60.039%29 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0716%26 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0713%26 Apr
nuke13–80.0628%26 Apr
inferno13–110.0523%26 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0114%26 Apr
overpass16–120.0420%26 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0014%25 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0129%25 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0717%25 Apr
mirage13–50.0917%25 Apr
dust213–10.1325%25 Apr
nuke13–40.0217%25 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0220%25 Apr
ancient13–110.0513%22 Apr
inferno13–30.0430%22 Apr
ancient2–13-0.140%20 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0410%18 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0118%18 Apr
inferno13–110.0819%18 Apr
nuke13–80.0721%18 Apr
inferno11–130.0626%18 Apr
overpass9–130.0823%17 Apr
nuke13–40.0625%17 Apr
ancient13–30.0614%16 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0118%12 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0317%12 Apr
ancient13–90.0821%12 Apr
nuke13–40.0525%12 Apr
mirage11–130.0621%12 Apr
inferno13–40.0615%12 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0620%12 Apr
mirage16–90.0215%19 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0626%14 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0714%14 Sept
anubis16–7-0.0616%31 Aug
nuke16–11-0.0218%31 Aug
inferno16–7-0.0212%31 Aug
overpass16–130.0415%31 Aug
overpass8–16-0.0716%30 Aug
mirage19–17-0.0122%29 Aug
inferno9–16-0.0112%28 Aug
inferno16–10-0.0319%28 Aug
vertigo12–16-0.0124%28 Aug
overpass8–16-0.067%28 Aug
mirage14–160.0319%27 Aug
overpass16–30.0420%27 Aug
inferno8–16-0.1013%27 Aug
overpass12–10.0516%26 Aug
ancient10–16-0.0112%26 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0314%26 Aug
nuke16–90.0515%26 Aug
inferno16–20.0018%26 Aug
overpass16–10-0.0512%26 Aug
mirage16–11-0.0311%26 Aug
inferno11–160.0015%25 Aug
nuke15–19-0.0418%25 Aug
overpass14–160.0218%25 Aug
ancient10–16-0.0417%25 Aug
ancient16–140.0419%25 Aug
mirage18–22-0.0412%25 Aug
ancient17–190.0213%24 Aug
mirage12–16-0.008%24 Aug
mirage14–16-0.056%23 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0116%22 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0713%22 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0416%20 Aug
mirage16–6-0.0413%20 Aug
overpass16–13-0.038%19 Aug
inferno4–16-0.1120%18 Aug
vertigo16–14-0.0714%18 Aug
ancient8–16-0.0012%18 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0416%17 Aug
vertigo13–16-0.0417%17 Aug
mirage11–16-0.0320%17 Aug
inferno6–16-0.0614%17 Aug
overpass10–16-0.0822%17 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →