Partyzombie

Partyzombie — CS2 Stats

DE76561198019887449[U:1:59621721]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

211Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,565Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,855Blue band · top ~45.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,855 -2,145 3 May – 30 Sept · 35 days played
11,75014,999peak 14,9993 May30 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-04-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,144 below peak (14,999)
  • -958 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,085 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,145 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,989), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate35.4%42.7%43.8%8.4% short
Shot accuracy14.5%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.100.991.02above
Match win rate46.3%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPartyzombieFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,855 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning73
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLLWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.0
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning7.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time525ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 3 May →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 11 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 31 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2212–1055%0.01
nukeB2010–1050%0.01
anubisC177–1041%0.02
ancientC135–838%0.02
cacheA95–456%-0.01
overpassC83–538%-0.01
dust2C73–443%0.03
mirage—30–30%0.00
train—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,121Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,079Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
35.4%Headshot %
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,364MVPs
960Hours (in match)
1,374Bombs planted
397Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-476,408
AWP3,961
P901,657
SSG 081,463
SG 5531,064
P2501,017

Lifetime map wins

4,482assault
3,444inferno
3,182dust2
3,159nuke
571cbble
453train
279aztec
255militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches
51%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
96.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1631%1.4620.5
Nuke1669%1.6920.5
Inferno1553%1.3017.6
Train425%0.9918.0
Mirage450%1.2117.5
Dust220%1.0826.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
69.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
514msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
9.27HE damage / grenade
5.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0114%30 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0422%30 Sept →
cache13–110.0126%30 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0318%28 Sept →
inferno10–130.009%28 Sept →
dust213–80.0026%28 Sept →
dust29–130.0220%27 Sept →
inferno13–50.037%27 Sept →
dust216–130.0416%26 Sept →
nuke13–30.0924%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.019%26 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0617%14 Sept →
cache16–130.0117%14 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0416%13 Sept →
inferno13–50.0416%13 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0113%13 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0120%9 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0317%9 Sept →
ancient7–130.009%7 Sept →
inferno13–60.068%7 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0111%7 Sept →
cache13–60.0118%7 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0619%3 Sept →
mirage6–130.0626%3 Sept →
ancient13–100.0217%3 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0226%3 Sept →
ancient13–70.1216%1 Sept →
nuke6–130.0221%1 Sept →
nuke13–20.1116%1 Sept →
anubis14–160.0222%19 Aug →
train8–130.0317%18 Aug →
inferno11–10.0516%18 Aug →
nuke13–40.0515%18 Aug →
dust27–40.0422%18 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0622%21 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.026%16 Jul →
ancient13–100.0915%16 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0116%15 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0220%15 Jul →
nuke13–50.0422%15 Jul →
cache13–110.067%15 Jul →
nuke13–100.036%13 Jul →
nuke13–70.0716%13 Jul →
dust26–130.0620%13 Jul →
inferno13–90.0115%12 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0211%12 Jul →
dust212–16-0.0328%11 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0530%11 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0117%10 Jul →
cache14–16-0.009%9 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0227%9 Jul →
inferno13–30.1111%9 Jul →
nuke1–70.0012%2 Jul →
anubis3–130.0820%2 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0312%22 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0413%21 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0315%21 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0215%17 Jun →
inferno13–100.0422%17 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0315%16 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0314%15 Jun →
anubis13–110.1211%15 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0310%15 Jun →
anubis13–100.0218%15 Jun →
nuke13–70.0110%10 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.064%10 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0716%10 Jun →
inferno13–80.0113%10 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0315%8 Jun →
overpass11–130.0117%7 Jun →
overpass2–13-0.0727%4 Jun →
ancient6–130.0721%31 May →
anubis13–4-0.0113%31 May →
inferno13–10.0913%31 May →
overpass6–13-0.0511%31 May →
inferno16–130.0023%31 May →
nuke13–80.0130%27 May →
ancient11–13-0.0110%26 May →
nuke13–40.0313%26 May →
inferno11–130.0325%20 May →
anubis11–13-0.0117%19 May →
anubis7–130.0113%18 May →
nuke15–15-0.0222%18 May →
dust211–130.0626%15 May →
anubis10–130.038%12 May →
nuke10–13-0.0513%12 May →
nuke11–13-0.0012%11 May →
inferno10–13-0.0215%11 May →
anubis13–60.0410%10 May →
anubis13–6-0.0212%10 May →
overpass13–110.1212%5 May →
ancient8–13-0.038%5 May →
overpass13–60.0916%5 May →
anubis7–13-0.0316%4 May →
inferno16–120.0414%3 May →
anubis13–50.1514%3 May →
ancient13–100.1016%3 May →
anubis7–130.0214%3 May →
ancient6–13-0.0311%3 May →
overpass2–13-0.077%28 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.