Nonne

Nonne — CS2 Stats

FI76561198019130185[U:1:58864457]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,859Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,213Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,172 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,172 → 2,172
+18Tracked matches · now 2,859
−6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 28 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,809 -2,534 28 Apr6 Jul · 17 days played
21,51925,000peak 25,00028 Apr6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,172 +0 3 Sept14 Sept · 2 observations
2,1722,172peak 2,1723 Sept14 Sept
25,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,172Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-04-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,172
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 328 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches17
Win rate47%
K/D1.07
Headshot %40%

Measured 14 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.3%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy14.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.801.071.09above
Match win rate44.8%46.9%48.4%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNonneFACEITLevel 9 · 2,172 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,172csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4456Last 10044%Win rateLLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility7.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility7.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time524ms−88ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 16 Aug
54%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 20 May
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 27 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L7Current streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA23131057%0.02
ancientD2061430%0.01
nukeC1761135%-0.00
infernoB157847%0.01
dust2B84450%0.03
mirageD72529%-0.01
cacheS64267%0.00
overpass42250%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

134,801Lifetime kills
1.80K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
4,078Matches
44.8%Match win rate
52.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10,983MVPs
1,770Hours (in match)
4,343Bombs planted
874Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,390inferno
5,371nuke
3,477dust2
1,749vertigo
1,329train
157cbble
120lake
48stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,232Matches
52%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
91.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18859%1.4318.8
Anubis14659%1.2517.6
Inferno14345%1.1617.2
Nuke11150%1.2418.4
Mirage7846%1.2618.1
Overpass4963%1.1918.3
Dust24434%1.0215.2
Vertigo4144%1.2120.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
527msReaction time
22.1%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
12.8%Flash assists
11.70HE damage / grenade
13.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.0562% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.049%18 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0419%14 Sept
ancient10–130.0117%13 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0420%7 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0136%3 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0413%3 Sept
nuke11–130.0615%1 Sept
anubis13–70.0326%1 Sept
cache6–13-0.0333%1 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0119%30 Aug
mirage9–130.0118%25 Aug
anubis10–130.0224%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0911%22 Aug
nuke6–130.0129%22 Aug
anubis10–130.0317%21 Aug
dust210–20.0521%21 Aug
inferno13–60.0630%21 Aug
cache13–7-0.0019%21 Aug
cache7–13-0.0318%20 Aug
anubis13–110.0524%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0217%20 Aug
nuke13–70.0231%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.006%19 Aug
anubis13–40.0029%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0621%18 Aug
dust213–90.1133%16 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0537%16 Aug
inferno13–110.0416%8 Aug
nuke11–130.0123%8 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0016%8 Aug
nuke13–110.0118%7 Aug
anubis13–110.0110%7 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0216%7 Aug
ancient16–140.0318%6 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0223%6 Aug
anubis9–130.0820%5 Aug
inferno13–11-0.019%5 Aug
ancient4–13-0.029%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0611%5 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0121%5 Aug
cache13–10-0.0317%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0020%3 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0026%3 Aug
dust211–130.048%2 Aug
inferno13–90.108%2 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0525%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0516%27 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0011%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0812%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0722%25 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0221%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0418%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0210%6 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0315%6 Jul
anubis13–80.0115%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0324%5 Jul
nuke7–130.0223%3 Jul
anubis13–9-0.018%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0332%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0423%28 Jun
anubis13–50.0722%17 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0518%17 Jun
nuke13–110.0513%16 Jun
anubis8–130.0216%16 Jun
inferno13–50.0121%14 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0215%14 Jun
anubis13–100.0216%10 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0122%10 Jun
overpass9–130.0521%28 May
inferno10–130.0127%28 May
mirage11–130.0617%25 May
ancient8–130.0322%25 May
overpass13–110.0620%23 May
ancient5–130.0216%21 May
anubis13–160.0520%21 May
ancient3–130.0354%20 May
ancient13–16-0.0212%19 May
overpass9–130.0617%19 May
nuke7–13-0.0224%15 May
inferno13–90.0417%15 May
cache13–100.0319%15 May
overpass16–140.0316%13 May
dust213–90.0819%13 May
ancient13–60.0417%13 May
inferno11–130.0318%12 May
anubis8–130.0318%12 May
nuke4–13-0.0514%10 May
ancient7–130.0914%4 May
dust213–110.1125%4 May
mirage11–13-0.0419%4 May
ancient7–13-0.0819%4 May
nuke4–13-0.0710%4 May
anubis13–50.0628%3 May
ancient13–90.0116%3 May
anubis13–70.0921%2 May
mirage3–13-0.0517%30 Apr
inferno10–130.0428%30 Apr
cache13–100.0834%30 Apr
anubis13–30.0226%30 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0216%28 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →