JMbo

JMbo — CS2 Stats

DE76561198013356377[U:1:53090649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,662Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,359Top 10% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10257 of 252184 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,181 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,359 +1,257 28 Jul – 15 Oct · 8 days played
25,00026,359peak 26,35928 Jul15 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,181 +0 31 Aug – 23 Sept · 2 observations
2,1812,181peak 2,18131 Aug23 Sept
26,359Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,181Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,181
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 319 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,359
  • +1,257 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,641 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJMboFACEITLevel 9 · 2,181 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,359 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,181csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–41–7Last 10052%Win rateWWLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time544ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–4 · eldorado, 27 Jul →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 22 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · debris, 21 Sept →
12–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

eldoradoBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
debrisB1910–953%-0.00
cacheB168–850%-0.00
poseidonC156–940%-0.03
eldoradoS128–467%0.02
nukeA117–464%0.01
anubisA85–363%-0.02
dust2D72–529%-0.04
ancientS64–267%-0.01
inferno—41–325%-0.00
mirage—21–150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,011Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
75.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13150%1.0114.9
Nuke10967%1.1915.4
Anubis9453%1.0314.2
Inferno9155%1.0314.7
Dust25829%0.9114.4
Cache3560%1.2216.4
Train3060%1.1014.6
Mirage2744%0.9514.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
514msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
9.06HE damage / grenade
11.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4856 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.1339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.1121%15 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0017%15 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.056%15 Oct →
debris9–5-0.078%15 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0825%7 Oct →
ancient13–20.0328%7 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0417%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0113%3 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0216%3 Oct →
nuke13–100.0519%29 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0324%27 Sept →
poseidon4–9-0.0610%21 Sept →
debris2–9-0.1427%21 Sept →
eldorado1–9-0.0925%21 Sept →
debris9–5-0.0314%21 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0416%21 Sept →
debris5–9-0.113%17 Sept →
debris9–60.0628%17 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0433%17 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0224%10 Sept →
debris8–80.1533%10 Sept →
eldorado9–30.0823%10 Sept →
poseidon9–60.0532%10 Sept →
debris7–90.0118%7 Sept →
eldorado9–40.0222%7 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0121%6 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.1013%6 Sept →
debris9–70.0911%6 Sept →
eldorado9–60.0335%6 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0424%21 Aug →
nuke16–130.0218%21 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0410%21 Aug →
nuke14–160.0114%21 Aug →
cache19–16-0.0616%21 Aug →
cache13–20.0419%21 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0826%21 Aug →
poseidon9–70.0114%21 Aug →
debris9–7-0.0219%21 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0112%20 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0324%20 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0919%16 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.019%16 Aug →
debris7–9-0.0512%10 Aug →
eldorado9–40.0512%10 Aug →
eldorado9–6-0.0110%10 Aug →
poseidon6–9-0.1222%10 Aug →
debris9–4-0.037%10 Aug →
poseidon9–40.0521%10 Aug →
debris9–70.0929%10 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0125%9 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0318%9 Aug →
debris6–9-0.0433%7 Aug →
debris9–10.1914%3 Aug →
eldorado7–9-0.0119%3 Aug →
poseidon8–8-0.0517%3 Aug →
debris8–8-0.0215%3 Aug →
poseidon2–9-0.1723%3 Aug →
poseidon4–9-0.1817%3 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0911%2 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0712%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.0022%28 Jul →
inferno13–60.1323%28 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0410%28 Jul →
dust210–00.0236%28 Jul →
eldorado9–7-0.0210%27 Jul →
poseidon9–3-0.027%27 Jul →
eldorado9–40.2021%27 Jul →
poseidon7–90.0820%27 Jul →
debris9–70.0214%27 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0112%26 Jul →
nuke7–0-0.0336%26 Jul →
poseidon3–9-0.0814%26 Jul →
eldorado8–8-0.134%26 Jul →
debris9–6-0.0311%26 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0724%26 Jul →
cache13–50.0133%22 Jul →
nuke12–00.0930%22 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0440%22 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0222%21 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0013%21 Jul →
dust25–130.0024%20 Jul →
cache8–130.0033%20 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.035%19 Jul →
eldorado8–8-0.0221%19 Jul →
eldorado9–40.1015%19 Jul →
cache9–130.0023%19 Jul →
debris5–9-0.0713%19 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0918%18 Jul →
ancient13–110.0522%18 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0221%18 Jul →
cache10–130.0129%18 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0426%18 Jul →
cache13–50.0920%17 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0617%17 Jul →
anubis13–50.0531%17 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0529%12 Jul →
cache14–160.0722%11 Jul →
nuke13–40.0123%11 Jul →
cache13–60.0817%11 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0822%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.